Longitudinal Flight Stability Augmentation of a Small Blended Wing-Body Aircraft with Canard as Control Surface

Transient response of an aircraft in longitudinal motion has two modes of oscillatory motion short period mode and phugoid modes and failure to achieve satisfactory level would mean poor flying and handling qualities leading to unnecessary pilot workload. This study proposes a stability augmentation system (SAS) in longitudinal flying modes for steady and level flight at all airspeeds and altitudes within Baseline-II E-2 BWBs operational flight envelope (OFE). The main controlling component of this stability augmentation system is a set of canard, a control surface located in front of the wing. It must be able to compensate Baseline-II E-2 BWB poor transient responses damping ratios so that good flying quality can be achieved. Observation from the transient responses of the unaugmented system signify high-frequency short-period oscillations with almost constant low damping ratio at an altitude, and low-frequency phugoid oscillation with varying damping ratio depending on airspeed. A conclusive behaviour of natural frequencies and damping ratios against dynamic pressure leads to the understanding on how dynamic pressure influences the flying qualities. Derivation of dynamic equations in terms of dynamic pressures enables one to design and device a feedback system to compensate poor flying qualities of the original unaugmented aircraft with conclusive relationship between important parameters and dynamic pressure are put in the overall dynamic equation. Two feedback gain systems, pitch attitude and pitch rate gains are scheduled based on dynamic pressure values and are combined into the aircraft longitudinal SAS. The proposed SAS has proven to be the suitable candidate for Baseline-II E-2 BWB as it is able to ensure Level 1 flying qualities, longitudinally.

[1]  Jiang Wu,et al.  Novel intelligent water drops optimization approach to single UCAV smooth trajectory planning , 2009 .

[2]  Han-Lim Choi,et al.  Real-Time Multi-UAV Task Assignment in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments , 2009 .

[3]  Narasimhan Sundararajan,et al.  A fault-tolerant neural aided controller for aircraft auto-landing , 2006 .

[4]  Luis F. Gonzalez,et al.  Multi-objective / multidisciplinary design optimisation of blended wing body UAV via advanced evolutionary algorithms , 2007 .

[5]  Giovanni Mengali,et al.  Flight control system design with H∞ loop-shaping approach through non-diagonal weights , 2009 .

[6]  Mark H Lowenberg,et al.  Stability and Control Assessment of a Blended-Wing-Body Airliner Configuration , 2005 .

[7]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Optimal gain-scheduled flight control system design using a new fuzzy clustering algorithm , 2009 .

[8]  Robert C. Nelson,et al.  Flight Stability and Automatic Control , 1989 .

[9]  Giorgio Guglieri,et al.  Flight control system design and optimisation with a genetic algorithm , 2005 .

[10]  Luis A. Aguirre,et al.  Flight path reconstruction – A comparison of nonlinear Kalman filter and smoother algorithms , 2011 .

[11]  Javier Roa,et al.  Optimization of planform and cruise conditions of a transport flying wing , 2010 .

[12]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Reconfigurable control allocation applied to an aircraft benchmark model , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[13]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[14]  Chaoyong Li,et al.  Adaptive backstepping-based flight control system using integral filters , 2009 .

[15]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.