The evolution of domain-content in bacterial genomes

BackgroundAcross all sequenced bacterial genomes, the number of domains ncin different functional categories c scales as a power-law in the total number of domains n, i.e. nc∝nαcMathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaemOBa42aaSbaaSqaaiabdogaJbqabaGccqGHDisTcqWGUbGBdaahaaWcbeqaaiabeg7aHnaaBaaameaacqWGJbWyaeqaaaaaaaa@34EC@, with exponents αcthat vary across functional categories. Here we investigate the implications of these scaling laws for the evolution of domain-content in bacterial genomes and derive the simplest evolutionary model consistent with these scaling laws.ResultsWe show that, using only an assumption of time invariance, the scaling laws uniquely determine the relative rates of domain additions and deletions across all functional categories and evolutionary lineages. In particular, the model predicts that the rate of additions and deletions of domains of category c is proportional to the number of domains nccurrently in the genome and we discuss the implications of this observation for the role of horizontal transfer in genome evolution. Second, in addition to being proportional to nc, the rate of additions and deletions of domains of category c is proportional to a category-dependent constant ρc, which is the same for all evolutionary lineages. This 'evolutionary potential' ρcrepresents the relative probability for additions/deletions of domains of category c to be fixed in the population by selection and is predicted to equal the scaling exponent αc. By comparing the domain content of 93 pairs of closely-related genomes from all over the phylogenetic tree of bacteria, we demonstrate that the model's predictions are supported by available genome-sequence data.ConclusionOur results establish a direct quantitative connection between the scaling of domain numbers with genome size, and the rate of addition and deletions of domains during short evolutionary time intervals.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Eugene V. Koonin, Martijn A. Huynen, and Sergei Maslov.

[1]  Timothy J. Harlow,et al.  Highways of gene sharing in prokaryotes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  C. Pál,et al.  Adaptive evolution of bacterial metabolic networks by horizontal gene transfer , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Profile hidden Markov models , 1998, Bioinform..

[4]  Howard Ochman,et al.  The Emergence and Fate of Horizontally Acquired Genes in Escherichia coli , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  J. Parkhill,et al.  Comparative genomic structure of prokaryotes. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[6]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[7]  M. Kimura.  The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution: Introduction , 1983 .

[8]  M. Huynen,et al.  The frequency distribution of gene family sizes in complete genomes. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  W. Martin,et al.  Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  E. Koonin,et al.  The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution , 2002, Nature.

[11]  B. Snel,et al.  Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life , 2006, Science.

[12]  M. Gerstein,et al.  The dominance of the population by a selected few: power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties , 2002, Genome Biology.

[13]  M. Kimura.  Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level , 1968, Nature.

[14]  J. Townsend,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[15]  K. Konstantinidis,et al.  Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Nei,et al.  Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection , 1988, Nature.

[17]  M. Nei,et al.  Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  N. Moran,et al.  Evolutionary Origins of Genomic Repertoires in Bacteria , 2005, PLoS biology.

[19]  E. Nimwegen.  Scaling Laws in the Functional Content of Genomes , 2003, physics/0307001.

[20]  F. Fang,et al.  Silencing of xenogeneic DNA by H-NS-facilitation of lateral gene transfer in bacteria by a defense system that recognizes foreign DNA. , 2007, Genes & development.

[21]  H. Ochman,et al.  Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation , 2000, Nature.

[22]  J. Felsenstein.  Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[23]  B. Snel,et al.  Genome evolution. Gene fusion versus gene fission. , 2000, Trends in Genetics.

[24]  E. Koonin,et al.  Genomics of bacteria and archaea: the emerging dynamic view of the prokaryotic world , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  B. Snel,et al.  Genomes in flux: the evolution of archaeal and proteobacterial gene content. , 2002, Genome research.

[26]  J. Doyne Farmer,et al.  Physicists attempt to scale the ivory towers of finance , 1999, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[27]  A. von Haeseler,et al.  A likelihood framework to measure horizontal gene transfer. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[29]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.