Satellite Risk Analysis Literature Review

Risk management in the Government satellite community is a very vague term. Everyone wants to manage risk but no one seems to know a good way to accomplish it. The current method seems to be an eye catching stoplight table where one axis is likelihood of the risk occurring and the other is the level of consequence if it does occur. Then each risk is placed on this table based solely on the designer’s opinion, most likely considering the consequence of having negative risks in front of an evaluator rather than the actual risk. This process also prevents the designer from taking into consideration the cost or value of the risk. This article explores the methods used by NASA and the finance community as well as a few other methods, such as discounted cash flow and the birdshot and buckshot methods, for handling risk to determine their usefulness to the Government satellite community. It also briefly examines some methods for calculating opportunity cost instead of solely calculating risk. Through the thorough investigation into these methods of calculating opportunity cost and performing risk assessment this research determined that when applied to Government satellite systems the methodologies proposed are not directly applicable. The techniques found in finance as well as at NASA are dependent on past data and statistical analysis that is not available to the majority of the satellite community. Most of the methods examined also rely on a company profit requirement and a free market that does not exist in the Government environment. However, it might be possible to modify some of these methods to enable the Government satellite community to use a version of them that has been tailored for their specific use. Further research is necessary to see if this concept would be possible and to determine if it is possible to develop a quantitative method for assessing both the risk and reward of a decision in a manner that eliminates as much of the human bias as possible. It is also necessary to look further into other industries and the commercial satellite community to see if other risk management processes exist that are more Government satellite community friendly.

[1]  G. Maggio Space Shuttle probabilistic risk assessment: methodology and application , 1996, Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[2]  K. P. Clark Mars Global Surveyor mission assurance: key approaches for faster, better, cheaper missions , 1998, 1998 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8339).

[3]  Christian Smart Space Shuttle Main Engine Quantitative Risk Assessment: Illustrating Modeling of a Complex System with a New QRA Software Package , 1998 .

[4]  V. R. Lalli Space-system reliability: a historical perspective , 1998 .

[5]  V. C. Ramesh,et al.  Real options for risk management in information technology projects , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[6]  Helge Granberg,et al.  5 – Reliability Considerations , 2001 .

[7]  M. M. Witkowski Managing risk for Cassini during Mission Operations and Data Analysis (MO&DA) , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[8]  Carlo Alberto Magni,et al.  Investment decisions in the theory of finance: Some antinomies and inconsistencies , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Sverrir Olafsson Making Decisions Under Uncertainty — Implications for High Technology Investments , 2003 .

[10]  J. A. Mackay,et al.  A Binomial Approach to Selecting Optimum Working Interest: Corporate Risk and Corporate Confidence , 2004 .

[11]  J. A. MacKay,et al.  A Binomial Approach to Selecting Optimum Working Interest: Corporate Risk and Corporate Confidence III. Ignorance is Not Bliss , 2004 .

[12]  Feng Hsu,et al.  The Space Shuttle Probabilistic Risk Assessment Framework , 2004 .

[13]  Bert De Reyck,et al.  On "investment decisions in the theory of finance: Some antinomies and inconsistencies" , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Venkat Allada,et al.  Evaluating Product Plans Using Real Options , 2007 .

[15]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Bankruptcy Law and Entrepreneurship Development: A Real Options Perspective , 2007 .

[16]  C.E. Bauer,et al.  Advanced Opportunity Cost Analysis of 3D Packaging Technologies , 2008, 2008 10th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference.

[17]  C. van Rhee,et al.  Real Options applied to infrastructure projects: A new approach to value and manage risk and flexibility , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).

[18]  Ernst R Berndt,et al.  The net value of health care for patients with type 2 diabetes, 1997 to 2005. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  Derek M Lemoine,et al.  Valuing Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles' Battery Capacity Using a Real Options Framework , 2009 .

[20]  Luis A. Aguilar,et al.  Investment assessment in co-generation with biomass in the presence of uncertainty and flexibility , 2009, 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech.

[21]  Jie Zhang,et al.  The Study on the Real Option Decision-Making Model for Investment Value of Water Project , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Engineering Computation.

[22]  Randolph H. Case Managing Risk in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2010 .

[23]  Brian White Enterprise Opportunity and Risk , 2011 .