Mathematical modeling of complex contagion on clustered networks

The spreading of behavior, such as the adoption of a new innovation, is influenced bythe structure of social networks that interconnect the population. In the experiments of Centola (Science, 2010), adoption of new behavior was shown to spread further and faster across clustered-lattice networks than across corresponding random networks. This implies that the “complex contagion” effects of social reinforcement are important in such diffusion, in contrast to “simple” contagion models of disease-spread which predict that epidemics would grow more efficiently on random networks than on clustered networks. To accurately model complex contagion on clustered networks remains a challenge because the usual assumptions (e.g. of mean-field theory) regarding tree-like networks are invalidated by the presence of triangles in the network; the triangles are, however, crucial to the social reinforcement mechanism, which posits an increased probability of a person adopting behavior that has been adopted by two or more neighbors. In this paper we modify the analytical approach that was introduced by Hebert-Dufresne et al. (Phys. Rev. E, 2010), to study disease-spread on clustered networks. We show how the approximation method can be adapted to a complex contagion model, and confirm the accuracy of the method with numerical simulations. The analytical results of the model enable us to quantify the level of social reinforcement that is required to observe—as in Centola’s experiments—faster diffusion on clustered topologies than on random networks.

[1]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[2]  Duanbing Chen,et al.  The small world yields the most effective information spreading , 2011, ArXiv.

[3]  J. Davis Univariate Discrete Distributions , 2006 .

[4]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The role of hidden influentials in the diffusion of online information cascades , 2013, EPJ Data Science.

[5]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Univariate Discrete Distributions: Johnson/Univariate Discrete Distributions , 2005 .

[6]  M. Newman Properties of highly clustered networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[10]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Dynamical Systems on Networks: A Tutorial , 2014, ArXiv.

[11]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[12]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[13]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Structural diversity in social contagion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Alessandro Flammini,et al.  Optimal network clustering for information diffusion , 2014, Physical review letters.

[15]  Mark D. F. Shirley,et al.  The impacts of network topology on disease spread , 2005 .

[16]  L. Hébert-Dufresne,et al.  Propagation dynamics on networks featuring complex topologies. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[18]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Joel C. Miller,et al.  Percolation and epidemics in random clustered networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  J. Gleeson Binary-state dynamics on complex networks: pair approximation and beyond , 2012, 1209.2983.

[21]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[23]  Barbara R. Jasny Realities of data sharing using the genome wars as case study - an historical perspective and commentary , 2012, EPJ Data Science.

[24]  P. G. Drazin,et al.  Nonlinear systems: Frontmatter , 1992 .

[25]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Cascading behaviour in complex socio-technical networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[26]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.