Finite element investigation of the loading rate effect on the spinal load-sharing changes under impact conditions.

Sudden deceleration and frontal/rear impact configurations involve rapid movements that can cause spinal injuries. This study aimed to investigate the rotation rate effect on the L2-L3 motion segment load-sharing and to identify which spinal structure is at risk of failure and at what rotation velocity the failure may initiate? Five degrees of sagittal rotations at different rates were applied in a detailed finite-element model to analyze the responses of the soft tissues and the bony structures until possible fractures. The structural response was markedly different under the highest velocity that caused high peaks of stresses in the segment compared to the intermediate and low velocities. Under flexion, the stress was concentrated at the upper pedicle region of L2 and fractures were firstly initiated in this region and then in the lower endplate of L2. Under extension, maximum stress was located in the lower pedicle region of L2 and fractures started in the left facet joint, then they expanded in the lower endplate and in the pedicle region of L2. No rupture has resulted at the lower or intermediate velocities. The intradiscal pressure was higher under flexion and decreased when the endplate was fractured, while the contact forces were greater under extension and decreased when the facet surface was cracked. The highest ligaments stresses were obtained under flexion and did not reach the rupture values. The endplate, pedicle and facet surface represented the potential sites of bone fracture. Results showed that spinal injuries can result at sagittal rotation velocity exceeding 0.5 degrees /ms.

[1]  M. Adams,et al.  Time-dependent changes in the lumbar spine's resistancc to bending , 1996 .

[2]  Ee-Chon Teo,et al.  Investigation of thoracolumbar T12-L1 burst fracture mechanism using finite element method. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  M. Adams,et al.  When Are Intervertebral Discs Stronger Than Their Adjacent Vertebrae? , 2007, Spine.

[4]  Stephen H M Brown,et al.  Vertebral end-plate fractures as a result of high rate pressure loading in the nucleus of the young adult porcine spine. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  W S Marras,et al.  Muscle activities during asymmetric trunk angular accelerations , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  A. Sances,et al.  The biomechanics of spinal injuries. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[7]  L. Claes,et al.  Intradiscal Pressure, Shear Strain, and Fiber Strain in the Intervertebral Disc Under Combined Loading , 2007, Spine.

[8]  W S Marras,et al.  An Assessment of Complex Spinal Loads During Dynamic Lifting Tasks , 1998, Spine.

[9]  Vijay K. Goel,et al.  Impact Response of the Intervertebral Disc in a Finite-Element Model , 2000, Spine.

[10]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  G. Jundt Modèles d'endommagement et de rupture des matériaux biologiques , 2007 .

[12]  D C Viano,et al.  A viscous tolerance criterion for soft tissue injury assessment. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Nonlinear gross response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in combined sagittal loadings. , 1988, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression , 1986, Spine.

[15]  A. Tencer,et al.  Mechanism of the Burst Fracture in the Thoracolumbar Spine: The Effect of Loading Rate , 1995, Spine.

[16]  B Aldman,et al.  The thoracolumbar crush fracture. An experimental study on instant axial dynamic loading: the resulting fracture type and its stability. , 1984, Spine.

[17]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  The Relationship Between Work History, Work Environment and Low-Back Pain in Men , 1984, Spine.

[18]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Strain in Fibers of a Lumbar Disc: Analysis of the Role of Lifting in Producing Disc Prolapse , 1989, Spine.

[19]  A. Nordwall,et al.  Traumatic Instability of the Lumbar Spine: A Dynamic In Vitro Study of Flexion‐Distraction Injury , 1995, Spine.

[20]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Biomechanical responses of the intervertebral joints to static and vibrational loading: a finite element study. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Peter Zioupos,et al.  The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  A. E. Engin,et al.  Viscoelastic Finite-Element Analysis of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Combined Compression and Sagittal Flexion: Effect of Loading Rate , 2000, Spine.

[25]  Pierre-Jean Arnoux,et al.  Knee ligaments mechanics , 2005 .

[26]  Jiri Dvorak,et al.  The mechanical properties of human alar and transverse ligaments at slow and fast extension rates. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  Josep A Planell,et al.  How does the geometry affect the internal biomechanics of a lumbar spine bi-segment finite element model? Consequences on the validation process. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Stefan M Duma,et al.  The influence of strain rate on the compressive stiffness properties of human lumbar intervertebral discs. , 2007, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[29]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Dynamics of Human Lumbar Intervertebral Joints: Experimental and Finite‐Element Investigations , 1992, Spine.

[30]  V.P.W. Shim,et al.  Characterisation of the dynamic compressive mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the human cervical spine , 2005 .

[31]  A. Nordwall,et al.  Flexion-distraction injury of the lumbar spine: influence of load, loading rate, and vertebral mineral content. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[32]  Masami Iwamoto,et al.  Effect of assumed stiffness and mass density on the impact response of the human chest using a three-dimensional FE model of the human body. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  J. Kelsey,et al.  An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[35]  Feng Luan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN NECK , 1998 .

[36]  S. McGill,et al.  Dynamic loading affects the mechanical properties and failure site of porcine spines. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[37]  Glenn Paskoff,et al.  Failure Properties of Cervical Spinal Ligaments Under Fast Strain Rate Deformations , 2007, Spine.

[38]  A Elhagediab,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  Allan F Tencer,et al.  Effect of loading rate on endplate and vertebral body strength in human lumbar vertebrae. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  A. Grishman Biomedical sciences instrumentation , 1964 .

[41]  G B Andersson,et al.  The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[42]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Physiologic Strains in the Lumbar Spinal Ligaments: An In VitroBiomechanical Study , 1982, Spine.

[43]  D. C. Barton,et al.  A dynamic investigation of the burst fracture process using a combined experimental and finite element approach , 2004, European Spine Journal.