The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki — First among Equals in Research Ethics?

The World Medical Association's (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki is one of the most important and influential international research ethics documents. Launched in 1964, when ethical guidance for research was scarce, the Declaration comprised eleven basic principles and provisions on clinical research. The document has since evolved to a complex set of principles, norms, and directions for action of varying degrees of specificity, ranging from specific rules to broad aspirational statements. It has been revised six times in an effort to maintain its influence. While all revisions were the result of vigorous debate, the 2000 revision and two subsequent notes of clarification spurred particular controversy surrounding the use of placebo in clinical research and the standard of care and post-trial obligations in research in developing countries. Several institutions opted to cite earlier versions of the Declaration, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently removed all reference to the Declaration in its approval requirements for drugs and biological products that are studied outside the United States.

[1]  A. London The ambiguity and the exigency: clarifying 'standard of care' arguments in international research. , 2000, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[2]  E. Emanuel Global Justice and the “Standard of Care” Debates , 2012 .

[3]  John R. Williams DECLARATION OF HELSINKI , 1964 .

[4]  Human subject protection; foreign clinical studies not conducted under an investigational new drug application. Final rule. , 2008, Federal register.

[5]  C. Grady,et al.  The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion , 2004, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[6]  R. Macklin Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing Countries , 2004 .

[7]  S. Eckstein Ethical considerations in HIV preventive vaccine research , 2012, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine.

[8]  C. Grady,et al.  The 2000 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: a step forward or more confusion? , 2001, The Lancet.

[9]  R. Macklin After Helsinki: Unresolved Issues in International Research , 2001, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal.

[10]  C. Foster,et al.  International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects , 1994, Bulletin of medical ethics.

[11]  E. Emanuel,et al.  The standard of care debate: can research in developing countries be both ethical and responsive to those countries' health needs? , 2004, American journal of public health.

[12]  Claire Gilbert Foster,et al.  International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects , 1994 .

[13]  K. McAdam,et al.  The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries , 2003 .

[14]  K. Krleza-Jeric,et al.  The Declaration of Helsinki , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Kenneth M Boyd,et al.  The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future. , 2004, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[16]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[17]  U. Schüklenk The standard of care debate: against the myth of an “international consensus opinion” , 2004, Journal of Medical Ethics.