Highly Sensitive Droplet Digital PCR Method for Detection of EGFR-Activating Mutations in Plasma Cell-Free DNA from Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in plasma cell-free DNA from lung cancer patients is an emerging clinical tool. However, compared with tissue testing, the sensitivity of plasma testing is not yet satisfactory because of the highly fragmented nature of plasma cell-free DNA, low fraction of tumor DNA, and limitations of available detection technologies. We therefore developed a highly sensitive and specific droplet digital PCR method for plasma EGFR mutation (exon19 deletions and L858R) testing. Plasma from 86 EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive lung cancer patients was tested and compared with EGFR mutation status of matched tumor tissues tested by amplification refractory mutation system. By using EGFR mutation-positive cell DNA, we optimized the droplet digital PCR assays to reach 0.04% sensitivity. The plasma testing sensitivity and specificity, compared with the matched tumor tissues tested by amplification refractory mutation system, were 81.82% (95% CI, 59.72%-94.81%) and 98.44% (95% CI, 91.60%-99.96%), respectively, for exon19 deletions, with 94.19% concordance rate (κ = 0.840; 95% CI, 0.704-0.976; P < 0.0001), whereas they were 80.00% (95% CI, 51.91%-95.67%) and 95.77% (95% CI, 88.14%-99.12%), respectively, for L858R, with 93.02% concordance rate (κ = 0.758; 95% CI, 0.571-0.945; P < 0.0001). The reported highly sensitive and specific droplet digital PCR assays for EGFR mutation detection have potential in clinical blood testing.

[1]  L. Mariani,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in plasma at diagnosis and during follow-up of lung cancer patients. , 2001, Cancer research.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  F. Nicolantonio,et al.  Liquid biopsy: monitoring cancer-genetics in the blood , 2013, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Koichi Goto,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status in Circulating Free DNA in Serum: From IPASS, a Phase III Study of Gefitinib or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[5]  Klaus Pantel,et al.  Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  Robert Brian Jenkins,et al.  Molecular Testing Guideline for Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for EGFR and ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[7]  Jae Cheol Lee,et al.  Detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA by PNA-mediated PCR clamping , 2013, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[8]  Masahiro Fukuoka,et al.  Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Chung-Man Ho,et al.  EGFR Array: Uses in the Detection of Plasma EGFR Mutations in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[10]  Kikuya Kato,et al.  Quantitative Detection of EGFR Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA Derived from Lung Adenocarcinomas , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  Kikuya Kato,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer and its correlation to the response to gefitinib , 2008, Cancer science.

[12]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  Detection of EGFR mutations in plasma DNA from lung cancer patients by mass spectrometry genotyping is predictive of tumor EGFR status and response to EGFR inhibitors. , 2011, Lung cancer.

[13]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Heterogeneity of the EGFR mutation status between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph node and the sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer , 2013, Targeted Oncology.

[14]  R. McCormack,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of pleural effusion and plasma samples versus tumour tissue for detection of EGFR mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of methodologies , 2013, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[15]  Jun Ma,et al.  Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  T. Mok,et al.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Qinghua Zhou,et al.  Influence of chemotherapy on EGFR mutation status among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  L. Diaz,et al.  Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  R. McCormack,et al.  First-line gefitinib in Caucasian EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients: a phase-IV, open-label, single-arm study , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  L. Mao,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in plasma DNA samples predict tumor response in Chinese patients with stages IIIB to IV non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Chun-Ming Tsai,et al.  Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  P. Jänne,et al.  Discordance of Molecular Biomarkers Associated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway between Primary Tumors and Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[23]  S. Kimura,et al.  Application of a Highly Sensitive Detection System for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Plasma DNA , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[24]  F. O. Fackelmayer,et al.  DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. , 2001, Cancer research.

[25]  Qinghua Zhou,et al.  Detection and Clinical Significance of Intratumoral EGFR Mutational Heterogeneity in Chinese Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  L. Beckett,et al.  EGFR Mutations Detected in Plasma Are Associated with Patient Outcomes in Erlotinib Plus Docetaxel-Treated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[27]  Hai Hu,et al.  A comparison of ARMS and direct sequencing for EGFR mutation analysis and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors treatment prediction in body fluid samples of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer patients , 2011, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[28]  T. Mok,et al.  EGFR mutation heterogeneity and the mixed response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors of lung adenocarcinomas. , 2012, The oncologist.

[29]  T. Mok,et al.  Single-Molecule Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Plasma by Microfluidics Digital PCR in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[30]  P. Walson,et al.  Digital droplet PCR for rapid quantification of donor DNA in the circulation of transplant recipients as a potential universal biomarker of graft injury. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[31]  Christopher M. Hindson,et al.  Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR , 2013, Nature Methods.

[32]  K. Nishio,et al.  Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Serum as a Predictor of the Response to Gefitinib in Patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .

[34]  E. Felip,et al.  Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[35]  P. Vineis,et al.  Circulating free DNA in plasma or serum as biomarker of carcinogenesis: practical aspects and biological significance. , 2007, Mutation research.

[36]  C. Paweletz,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of Response and Resistance in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer Using Quantitative Next-Generation Genotyping of Cell-Free Plasma DNA , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.