An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Mis

The purpose of this paper is to define and critique the use of contingency theory in the field ofManagement Information Systems (MIS). The existence of such a theory is demonstrated through adetailed review of the MIS literature. The development of contingency theory in MIS is compared tothe development of Organization Theory. The developments in the two fields have been remarkablysimilar and the field of MIS can benefit from the experiences of organization theorists. We arguethat since MIS is at an early stage of development, it is now repeating some of the unproductiveassumptions and lines of development of contingency theory.The conclusion from this analysis is that the contingency theory implicit in MIS research isinadequate. Progress in the field has been hampered by the adoption of a naive meta-theory and anarrow research perspective. This has resulted in highly mixed empirical results, a prematurequantification strategy, and ill-defined concepts of performance and fit.A series of recommendations for improving the theoretical basis of MIS are given. Theserecommendations include relaxing the assumptions that constitute the naive meta-theory of acontingency theory in MIS. A more subjectivist, less functional, less unreflexive and lessdeterministic approach is advocated. In addition, changes in research methodologies are recommended.An increased emphasis on training in case study methodologies, longitudinal research andethnographic approaches is suggested.

[1]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The Effects of Using a Nonprocedural Computer Language on Programmer Productivity , 1985, MIS Q..

[2]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Personality Characteristics of MIS Project Teams: An Empirical Study and Action-Research Design , 1982, MIS Q..

[3]  E. W. Martin,et al.  Critical Success Factors of Chief MIS/DP Executives , 1982, MIS Q..

[4]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[6]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[7]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital , 1974 .

[8]  Philip J. Pyburn,et al.  Linking the MIS Plan with Corporate Strategy: An Exploratory Study , 1983, MIS Q..

[9]  H. Lucas,et al.  Organizational power and the information services department , 1983, CACM.

[10]  François Bergeron,et al.  Factors Influencing the Use of DP Chargeback Information , 1986, MIS Q..

[11]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[12]  S. Klatzky,et al.  Automation, Size, and the Locus of Decision Making: The Cascade Effect , 1970 .

[13]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[14]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[15]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems , 1976 .

[16]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[17]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[18]  Allan Warmington,et al.  Organizational behaviour and performance , 1977 .

[19]  John H. Grant,et al.  Empirically derived models of strategic decision‐making processes , 1985 .

[20]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The impact of office automation on the organization: some implications for research and practice , 1982, CACM.

[21]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[22]  N. Carter.  Computerization as a Predominate Technology: Its Influence on the Structure of Newspaper Organizations , 1984 .

[23]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[24]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization , 1982, Adv. Comput..

[25]  H Austin,et al.  The economics of information systems. , 1986, Computers in healthcare.

[26]  W. G. Astley,et al.  Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth. , 1985 .

[27]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[29]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups , 1983, MIS Q..

[30]  Joan C. Woodward.  Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[31]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization , 1983, Inf. Manag..