Methodology and technology for the development of a prognostic MRI-based radiomic model for the outcome of head and neck cancer patients

The purpose of this study was to establish a methodology and technology for the development of an MRI-based radiomic signature for prognosis of overall survival (OS) in nasopharyngeal cancer from non-endemic areas. The signature was trained using 1072 features extracted from the main tumor in T1-weighted and T2-weighted images of 142 patients. A model with 2 radiomic features was obtained (RAD model). Tumor volume and a signature obtained by training the model on permuted survival data (RADperm model) were used as a reference. A 10-fold cross-validation was used to validate the signature. Harrel’s C-index was used as performance metric. A statistical comparison of the RAD, RADperm and volume was performed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. The C-index for the RAD model was higher compared to the one of the RADperm model (0.69±0.08 vs 0.47±0.05), which ensures absence of overfitting. Also, the signature obtained with the RAD model had an improved C-index compared to tumor volume alone (0.69±0.08 vs 0.65±0.06), suggesting that the radiomic signature provides additional prognostic information.

[1]  Ying Sun,et al.  Radiomics on multi-modalities MR sequences can subtype patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) into distinct survival subgroups , 2019, European Radiology.

[2]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[3]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Daniel B. Mark,et al.  TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORS , 1996 .

[5]  Benjamin Haibe-Kains,et al.  Vulnerabilities of radiomic signature development: The need for safeguards. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Brian O'Sullivan,et al.  Development and validation of a radiomic signature to predict HPV (p16) status from standard CT imaging: a multicenter study , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  Jiazhou Wang,et al.  MRI-based radiomics signature is a quantitative prognostic biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Valentina D. A. Corino,et al.  Assessment of Stability and Discrimination Capacity of Radiomic Features on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Images , 2018, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Andriy Fedorov,et al.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. , 2017, Cancer research.

[10]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: pre-treatment prediction of progression based on multi-parametric MRI radiomics , 2017, Oncotarget.

[11]  Luca Mainardi,et al.  Technical Note: Virtual phantom analyses for preprocessing evaluation and detection of a robust feature set for MRI‐radiomics of the brain , 2019, Medical physics.

[12]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[13]  Shao Hui Huang,et al.  External validation of a prognostic CT-based radiomic signature in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[14]  Guangjun Li,et al.  A multidimensional nomogram combining overall stage, dose volume histogram parameters and radiomics to predict progression-free survival in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2019, Oral oncology.

[15]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal of chiropractic medicine.