Multi-objective structural optimization of a wind turbine blade using NSGA-II algorithm and FSI

Purpose Wind turbines are one of the best candidates to solve the problem of increasing energy demand in the world. The aim of this paper is to apply a multi-objective structural optimization study to a Phase II wind turbine blade produced by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to obtain a more efficient small-scale wind turbine. Design/methodology/approach To solve this structural optimization problem, a new Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) was performed. In the optimization study, the objective function was on minimization of mass and cost of the blade, and design parameters were composite material type and spar cap layer number. Design constraints were deformation, strain, stress, natural frequency and failure criteria. ANSYS Composite PrepPost (ACP) module was used to model the composite materials of the blade. Moreover, fluid–structure interaction (FSI) model in ANSYS was used to carry out flow and structural analysis on the blade. Findings As a result, a new original blade was designed using the multi-objective structural optimization study which has been adapted for aerodynamic optimization, the NSGA-II algorithm and FSI. The mass of three selected optimized blades using carbon composite decreased as much as 6.6%, 11.9% and 14.3%, respectively, while their costs increased by 23.1%, 29.9% and 38.3%. This multi-objective structural optimization-based study indicates that the composite configuration of the blade could be altered to reach the desired weight and cost for production. Originality/value ACP module is a novel and advanced composite modeling technique. This study is a novel study to present the NSGA-II algorithm, which has been adapted for aerodynamic optimization, together with the FSI. Unlike other studies, complex composite layup, fiber directions and layer orientations were defined by using the ACP module, and the composite blade analyzed both aerodynamic pressure and structural design using ACP and FSI modules together.

[1]  M. S. Genç,et al.  Performance of transition model for predicting low Re aerofoil flows without/with single and simultaneous blowing and suction , 2011 .

[2]  E. H. Choi,et al.  Layout optimization for multi-platform offshore wind farm composed of spar-type floating wind turbines , 2015 .

[3]  Tongguang Wang,et al.  Multi-objective differential evolution optimization based on uniform decomposition for wind turbine blade design , 2017 .

[4]  L. Zhang,et al.  Uniform Test Method Optimum Design for Drag-Type Modified Savonius VAWTs by CFD Numerical Simulation , 2018 .

[5]  Murat Gökçek,et al.  Evaluation of Wind Characteristics and Energy Potential in Kayseri, Turkey , 2009 .

[6]  Rafic Younes,et al.  Review of performance optimization techniques applied to wind turbines , 2015 .

[7]  Unver Kaynak,et al.  An experimental and computational study of low Re number transitional flows over an aerofoil with leading edge slat , 2008 .

[8]  Luai M. Alhems,et al.  Vertical axis wind turbine types, efficiencies, and structural stability– A Review , 2019 .

[9]  Progressive Damage Modeling of an Adhesively Bonded Composite Single Lap Joint Under Flexural Loads at the Mesoscale Level , 2007 .

[10]  M. S. Genç,et al.  Economic Analysis of Large-Scale Wind Energy Conversion Systems in Central Anatolian Turkey , 2010 .

[11]  Maureen Hand,et al.  Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phases II-IV Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns , 1999 .

[12]  Ahmad Reza Ghasemi,et al.  Numerical and analytical study of aeroelastic characteristics of wind turbine composite blades , 2014 .

[13]  Gokhan Ozkan,et al.  Acoustic Control of Flow over NACA 2415 Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2016 .

[14]  Ilyas Karasu,et al.  Performance Assessment of Transition Models for Three-Dimensional Flow Over NACA4412 Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2018, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[15]  P. K. Chaviaropoulos,et al.  Investigating Three-Dimensional and Rotational Effects on Wind Turbine Blades by Means of a Quasi-3D Navier-Stokes Solver , 2000 .

[16]  Nitin Tenguria,et al.  Structural analysis of horizontal axis wind turbine blade , 2013 .

[17]  Jiuyue Xu,et al.  Blade layers optimization of wind turbines using FAST and improved PSO Algorithm , 2012 .

[18]  M. Apalak,et al.  Progressive Damage Modeling of an Adhesively Bonded Unidirectional Composite Single-lap Joint in Tension at the Mesoscale Level , 2006 .

[19]  Halil Hakan Açıkel,et al.  Control of laminar separation bubble over wind turbine airfoil using partial flexibility on suction surface , 2018, Energy.

[20]  M. Devesh Raj,et al.  Swarm-Inspired Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Solving Optimal Power Flow with Wind Farm , 2014 .

[21]  Hamid Reza Karshenas,et al.  Dynamic modeling and optimal control of DFIG wind energy systems using DFT and NSGA-II , 2014 .

[22]  Roham Rafiee,et al.  Aeroelastic investigation of a composite wind turbine blade , 2013 .

[23]  Hani M. Negm,et al.  Optimal frequency design of wind turbine blades , 2002 .

[24]  Optimization of a horizontal axis marine current turbine via surrogate models , 2019 .

[25]  Mustafa Serdar Genç,et al.  Identification of flow phenomena over NACA 4412 wind turbine airfoil at low Reynolds numbers and role of laminar separation bubble on flow evolution , 2018 .

[26]  Mariusz Pawlak,et al.  Optimisation of wind turbine blades , 2005 .

[27]  Mustafa Serdar GENÇ,et al.  Investigation of pre-stall flow control on wind turbine blade airfoil using roughness element , 2019, Energy.

[28]  M. Genç,et al.  Flow control with perpendicular acoustic forcing on NACA 2415 aerofoil at low Reynolds numbers , 2016 .

[29]  M. S. Genç,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Flow over a Thin Aerofoil at a High Reynolds Number Using a Transition Model , 2010 .

[30]  Lin Wang,et al.  Structural optimisation of vertical-axis wind turbine composite blades based on finite element analysis and genetic algorithm , 2016 .

[31]  C. Kong,et al.  Structural investigation of composite wind turbine blade considering various load cases and fatigue life , 2005 .

[32]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[33]  Mustafa Serdar Genç,et al.  Numerical investigation of flow on NACA4412 aerofoil with different aspect ratios , 2016 .

[34]  Jie Zhu,et al.  Structural Optimization Design of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Blades Using a Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Finite Element Method , 2012 .

[35]  Mustafa Serdar Genç,et al.  Economic Viability of Water Pumping Systems Supplied by Wind Energy Conversion and Diesel Generator Systems in North Central Anatolia, Turkey , 2011 .

[36]  G. Özkan,et al.  Interaction of tip vortex and laminar separation bubble over wings with different aspect ratios under low Reynolds numbers , 2018 .

[37]  Dong-Hoon Choi,et al.  Multi-objective structural optimization of a HAWT composite blade based on ultimate limit state analysis , 2012 .

[38]  M. Apalak,et al.  Progressive Damage Modeling of an Adhesively Bonded Composite Single Lap Joint Under Flexural Loads at the Mesoscale Level , 2007 .

[39]  Raghava R. Kommalapati,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction analysis of NREL phase VI wind turbine: Aerodynamic force evaluation and structural analysis using FSI analysis , 2017 .

[40]  K. Koca,et al.  Effect of partial flexibility over both upper and lower surfaces to flow over wind turbine airfoil , 2020 .

[41]  Zhang Lan-ting.  Research on Structural Lay-up Optimum Design of Composite Wind Turbine Blade , 2012 .