Fracture & Fatigue Analyses: SGBEM-FEM or XFEM? Part 1: 2D Structures

In this paper, and its companion Part 2 [Dong and Atluri (2013b)], the Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method (SGBEM), and the SGBEMFEM alternating/coupling methods, are compared with the recently popularized Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM), for analyzing fracture and fatigue crack propagation in complex structural geometries. The historical development, and the theoretical/algorithmic formulations, of each method are succinctly reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are critically discussed. A comprehensive evaluation of the performances of the SGBEM-based methods, and their comparison with XFEM, in modeling cracked solid structures undergoing fatigue crack-growth is carried out. A thorough examination of a large set of numerical examples of varying degrees of complexity shows that, the SGBEM-based methods: (a) are far more accurate than XFEM for computing stress intensity factors, and thus the fatigue-crack-growth-rates; (b) require significantly coarser and lower-quality meshes than in XFEM, and thus result in significant savings of computational costs, and more importantly in considerable savings of the human-labor-costs of generating meshes; (c) require minimal effort for modeling the non-collinear/non-planar propagation of cracks under fatigue, without using the Level Set or Fast Marching methods to track the crack surface; (d) can easily perform fracture and fatigue analysis of complex structures, such as repaired cracked structures with composite patches, and damage in heterogeneous materials. It is thus concluded that the SGBEM-based methods, and alternating methods, which were developed over the past 20-30 years by Atluri and his many collaborators, are by far the best methods for analyzing fracture and non-planar fatigue crack propagation in complex structures, and are thus valuable for inclusion in general-purpose, off-the-shelf commercial software for structural analyses. This objective is pursued by the authors.

[1]  Chyanbin Hwu,et al.  Interactions between inclusions and various types of cracks , 1995 .

[2]  Frank J. Rizzo,et al.  An integral equation approach to boundary value problems of classical elastostatics , 1967 .

[3]  R. Shield,et al.  Conservation laws in elasticity of the J-integral type , 1977 .

[4]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  SGBEM (for Cracked Local Subdomain) -- FEM (for uncracked global Structure) Alternating Method for Analyzing 3D Surface Cracks and Their Fatigue-Growth , 2002 .

[5]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  An extended finite element method with higher-order elements for curved cracks , 2003 .

[6]  Hiroshi Tada,et al.  The stress analysis of cracks handbook , 2000 .

[7]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Arbitrary branched and intersecting cracks with the eXtended Finite Element Method , 2000 .

[8]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  A Novel Displacement Gradient Boundary Element Method for Elastic Stress Analysis With High Accuracy , 1988 .

[9]  G. Maier,et al.  Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Methods , 1998 .

[10]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Analysis of cracks in aging aircraft structures, with and without composite-patch repairs , 1992 .

[11]  J. Rice A path-independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain , 1968 .

[12]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  An assumed displacement hybrid finite element model for linear fracture mechanics , 1975 .

[13]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Integrity of aircraft structural elements with multi-site fatigue damage , 1995 .

[14]  R. D. Henshell,et al.  CRACK TIP FINITE ELEMENTS ARE UNNECESSARY , 1975 .

[15]  T. NISHIOKAt PATH-INDEPENDENT INTEGRALS, ENERGY RELEASE RATES, AND GENERAL SOLUTIONS OF NEAR-TIP FIELDS IN MIXED-MODE DYNAMIC FRACTURE MECHANICS , 2013 .

[16]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Analytical solution for embedded elliptical cracks, and finite element alternating method for elliptical surface cracks, subjected to arbitrary loadings , 1983 .

[17]  S. Atluri,et al.  CALCULATION OF FRACTURE MECHANICS PARAMETERS FOR AN ARBITRARY THREE-DIMENSIONAL CRACK, BY THE ‘EQUIVALENT DOMAIN INTEGRAL’ METHOD , 1987 .

[18]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  SGBEM (Using Non-hyper-singular Traction BIE), and Super Elements, for Non-Collinear Fatigue-growth Analyses of Cracks in Stiffened Panels with Composite-Patch Repairs , 2012 .

[19]  Theodore H. H. Pian,et al.  A hybrid‐element approach to crack problems in plane elasticity , 1973 .

[20]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing , 1999 .

[21]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  A Systematic Approach for the Development of Weakly--Singular BIEs , 2007 .

[22]  L. Gray,et al.  SGBEM analysis of crack-particle(s) interactions due to elastic constants mismatch , 2007 .

[23]  村上 敬宜,et al.  Stress intensity factors handbook , 1987 .

[24]  J. D. Eshelby,et al.  The force on an elastic singularity , 1951, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[25]  Attilio Frangi,et al.  Symmetric BE method in two-dimensional elasticity: evaluation of double integrals for curved elements , 1996 .

[26]  D. Chopp,et al.  Three‐dimensional non‐planar crack growth by a coupled extended finite element and fast marching method , 2008 .

[27]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Non‐planar 3D crack growth by the extended finite element and level sets—Part I: Mechanical model , 2002 .

[28]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  An Embedded Elliptical Crack, in an Infinite Solid, Subject to Arbitrary Crack-Face Tractions , 1981 .

[29]  Jean-Herve Prevost,et al.  MODELING QUASI-STATIC CRACK GROWTH WITH THE EXTENDED FINITE ELEMENT METHOD PART II: NUMERICAL APPLICATIONS , 2003 .

[30]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  SGBEM-FEM Alternating Method for Analyzing 3D Non-planar Cracks and Their Growth in Structural Components , 2001 .

[31]  Attilio Frangi,et al.  3D fracture analysis by the symmetric Galerkin BEM , 2002 .

[32]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Mixed mode fatigue growth of curved cracks emanating from fastener holes in aircraft lap joints , 1998 .

[33]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  On Simple Formulations of Weakly-Singular Traction {\&} Displacement BIE, and Their Solutions through Petrov-Galerkin Approaches , 2003 .

[34]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL STRATEGIES FOR FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH IN THREE DIMENSIONS WITH APPLICATION TO AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS , 1995 .

[35]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Residual strength prediction for aircraft panels with Multiple Site Damage, using the “EPFEAM” for stable crack growth analysis , 1995 .

[36]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Non‐planar 3D crack growth by the extended finite element and level sets—Part II: Level set update , 2002 .

[37]  S. Atluri,et al.  AN EQUIVALENT DOMAIN INTEGRAL METHOD FOR COMPUTING CRACK-TIP INTEGRAL PARAMETERS IN NON-ELASTIC, THERMO-MECHANICAL FRACTURE , 1987 .

[38]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Non-hyper-singular integral-representations for velocity (displacement) gradients in elastic/plastic solids (small or finite deformations) , 1989 .

[39]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Computational methods in the mechanics of fracture , 1987, International Journal of Fracture.

[40]  S. Li,et al.  Symmetric weak-form integral equation method for three-dimensional fracture analysis , 1998 .

[41]  Norio Hasebe,et al.  New integration scheme for the branch crack problem , 1995 .

[42]  S. Atluri,et al.  Fracture & Fatigue Analyses: SGBEM-FEM or XFEM?Part 2: 3D Solids , 2013 .

[43]  H. Hong,et al.  Derivations of Integral Equations of Elasticity , 1988 .

[44]  D. Chopp,et al.  Extended finite element method and fast marching method for three-dimensional fatigue crack propagation , 2003 .

[45]  R. Barsoum On the use of isoparametric finite elements in linear fracture mechanics , 1976 .