Explanation of Anomalous Behavior Observed in Impedance Eduction Techniques Using Measured Data

Several enhancements that improve the accuracy and robustness of an impedance eduction technique that use an automatic optimizer are presented. These enhancements are then used to launch an intensive investigation into the cause of anomalous behavior that occurs for a small number of test conditions. This anomalous behavior is investigated for both a hardwall insert and a conventional liner. The primary conclusions of the study are that: (1) for the hard wall insert, the anomalies are due to narrow peaks in the objective function, (2) For the conventional liner, the anomalies are due to the presence of an extremely flat objective function, and (3) the anomalies appear to be triggered by inconsistencies between the duct propagation model and the measured data. At high frequencies, the duct propagation model may need to include the effects of higher-order duct modes, whereas at low frequencies, the effects of the mean boundary layer may have to be included.

[1]  D. L. Armstrong,et al.  Impedance measurements of acoustic duct liners with grazing flow , 1974 .

[2]  Hans Bodén,et al.  An inverse analytical method for extracting liner impedance from pressure measurements , 2004 .

[3]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Comparison of Acoustic Impedance Eduction Techniques for Locally-Reacting Liners , 2003 .

[4]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Modifications to the NASA Langley Flow Impedance Tube , 2004 .

[5]  M. K. Myers,et al.  On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence of flow , 1980 .

[6]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Comparison of Two Waveguide Methods for Educing Liner Impedance in Grazing Flow , 2004 .

[7]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Impedance Eduction in Ducts with Higher-Order Modes and Flow , 2009 .

[8]  Vincent Pagneux,et al.  Measurement of Liner Impedance with Flow by an Inverse Method , 2004 .

[9]  G. W. Stewart,et al.  A Modification of Davidon's Minimization Method to Accept Difference Approximations of Derivatives , 1967, JACM.

[10]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  A Quasi-3-D Theory for Impedance Eduction in Uniform Grazing Flow , 2005 .

[11]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Optimization Method for Educing Variable-Impedance Liner Properties , 1998 .

[12]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Impedance Eduction In the Presence of Shear Flow , 2001 .

[13]  Carl H. Gerhold,et al.  Development of an Experimental Rig for Investigation of Higher Order Modes in Ducts , 2006 .

[14]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Validation of an Impedance Eduction Method in Flow , 1999 .

[15]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Comparison of a Convected Helmholtz and Euler Model for Impedance Eduction in Flow , 2006 .

[16]  Xiaofeng Sun,et al.  A straightforward method for wall impedance eduction in a flow duct. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Investigation of an Anomaly Observed in Impedance Eduction Techniques , 2008 .

[18]  W. R. Watson A method for determining acoustic-liner admittance in ducts with sheared flow in two-cross-sectional directions , 1985 .

[19]  Hans Bodén,et al.  Validation of an Inverse Analytical Technique to Educe Liner Impedance with Grazing Flow , 2006 .