Digital and Physical Materiality of Information Technologies: The Case of Fitbit Activity Tracking Devices

This paper explores the role of digital and physical materiality in relation to the use of Fit bit activity tracking devices. Materiality concerns properties of a technology that transcend space, time, and particularities of the contexts. Our objective, in particular, is to examine how digital and physical properties may play a role in shaping user's perception and actions around the use of Fit bit devices. The primary findings are (1) both digital and physical material properties of the device together provide a material framework, which constrains and enables users' activities, and (2) both forms of materiality are contingent upon the design/form of the device. As a result the materiality of digital information cannot be studied without examining its entwining with the information technology that records, processes, shares, and represents it.

[1]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter , 2010, First Monday.

[3]  S. Dickman.  Living in a material world , 1988, Nature.

[4]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World , 2013 .

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  IT and organizational change in digital economies: a socio-technical approach , 1999, CSOC.

[6]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Materiality matters---experience materials , 2013, INTR.

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[8]  Gabriel Abend.  Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies , 2010 .

[9]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[10]  Nicholas Negroponte,et al.  Being Digital , 1995 .

[11]  C. Shalizi.  The Domestication of the Savage Mind , 2009 .

[12]  Zdravka K. Todorova.  Forces of Production , 2007 .

[13]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[14]  J. Kallinikos.  Form, function and matter: crossing the border of materiality , 2012 .

[15]  T. Pinch,et al.  Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies , 2008 .

[16]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  The material practices of collaboration , 2012, CSCW.

[17]  L. Mumford.  Technics and Civilization , 1934, Nature.

[18]  P. Leonardi,et al.  The challenge of materiality: Origins, scope, and prospects , 2012 .

[19]  D. Bell.  The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society , 1973 .

[20]  P. Leonardi.  Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How are They Related? Do We Need Them? , 2012 .

[21]  P. Dourish,et al.  Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice , 2011 .

[22]  Jean-François Blanchette,et al.  A material history of bits , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..