Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al. Visual Apperceptive Agnosia: A Clinico-Anatomical Study of Three Cases , 1988, Cortex.
[2] A. Ellis. Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .
[3] I. Biederman,et al. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.
[4] Guido Gainotti,et al. Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific semantic impairment for living beings , 1996 .
[5] David Caplan,et al. Constraining theories of semantic memory processing: Evidence from Dementia , 1992 .
[6] M. Tarr,et al. Differing views on views: comments on Biederman and Bar (1999) , 2000, Vision Research.
[7] J T Townsend,et al. Feature sensitivity, bias, and interdependencies as a function of energy and payoffs , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[8] H. Hughes,et al. Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[9] David Gaffan,et al. A Spurious Category-Specific Visual Agnosia for Living Things in Normal Human and Nonhuman Primates , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[10] Martha J. Farah,et al. Semantically-bounded anomia: Implications for the neural implementation of naming , 1992, Neuropsychologia.
[11] B. Tabachnick,et al. Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .
[12] Giuseppe Sartori,et al. The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information , 1998 .
[13] J. Pellegrino,et al. Acquisition and Transfer of Skilled Performance: Are Visual Discrimination Skills Stimulus Specific? , 1996 .
[14] D. Watt. Visual Processing: Computational Psychophysical and Cognitive Research , 1990 .
[15] The Apparent Size of Three-Dimensional Objects and Their Silhouettes: A Solid-Superiority Effect , 1988, Perception.
[16] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[17] W. Hayward. Effects of outline shape in object recognition , 1998 .
[18] T. Lloyd-Jones,et al. A Selective Deficit for Living Things after Temporal Lobectomy for Relief of Epileptic Seizures , 2001, Brain and Language.
[19] Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al. Are living and non-living category-specific deficits causally linked to impaired perceptual or associative knowledge? evidence from a category-specific double dissociation , 1998 .
[20] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. A verbal-semantic category-specific recognition impairment , 1993 .
[21] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[22] John Hart,et al. Neural subsystems for object knowledge , 1992, Nature.
[23] M. Moscovitch,et al. Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .
[24] M. Corballis. Recognition of disoriented shapes. , 1988, Psychological review.
[25] A. Caramazza,et al. Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[26] K. Laws,et al. A ‘normal’ category-specific advantage for naming living things , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[27] Larry E. Toothaker,et al. Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1992 .
[28] Judith F. Kroll,et al. Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .
[29] S. Lupker. Picture Naming: An Investigation of the Nature of Categorical Priming , 1988 .
[31] Stephen J. Lupker,et al. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .
[32] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .
[33] Elaine Funnell,et al. Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .
[34] R. Kimchi. Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.
[35] M J Tarr,et al. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] M. Silveri,et al. Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1988 .
[37] E. Warrington,et al. Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[38] M J Tarr,et al. Recognizing Silhouettes and Shaded Images across Depth Rotation , 1999, Perception.
[39] M. Tarr,et al. To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .
[40] Jan J. Koenderink,et al. Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes , 1987 .
[41] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.
[42] Irving Biederman,et al. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.
[43] S Monsell,et al. The Locus of Repetition Priming of Spoken Word Production , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[44] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .
[45] Christopher Barry,et al. Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .
[46] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .
[47] M. Farah,et al. A category-specific naming impairment after temporal lobectomy , 1996, Neuropsychologia.
[48] E. Warrington,et al. CATEGORY SPECIFIC ACCESS DYSPHASIA , 1983 .
[49] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Categorizing chairs and naming pears: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[50] A J Parkin,et al. Naming Impairments following Recovery from Herpes Simplex Encephalitis: Category-Specific? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[51] T. Sanocki. Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] M. Coltheart,et al. The organization of object knowledge: evidence from neuropsychology , 1993 .
[53] G. Humphreys,et al. Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. , 1995 .
[54] G. Humphreys,et al. Visual object processing in optic aphasia: a case of semantic access agnosia , 1987 .
[55] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[56] G. Humphreys,et al. Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts , 1992 .
[57] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[58] R. Berndt,et al. Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction , 1985, Nature.
[59] J. Hodges,et al. Deficits of semantic memory and executive control: Evidence for differing effects upon naming in dementia , 1996 .
[60] M. Tarr,et al. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[61] C. Eriksen,et al. Response competition effects insame-different judgments , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.
[62] I. Biederman,et al. Evidence for Complete Translational and Reflectional Invariance in Visual Object Priming , 1991, Perception.
[63] T. Shallice,et al. Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .
[64] Malou M-Louise Haine,et al. De Wilde V. , 1986 .
[65] M. M. Meyer,et al. Can recognotion of living things be selectively impaired? , 1991, Neuropsychologia.