Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things

We assess the importance of outline shape in mediating the recognition of living and nonliving things. Natural objects were presented as shaded line drawings or silhouettes, and were living and nonliving things. For object decision (deciding whether an object may be encountered in real life) there were longer response times (RTs) to nonliving than to living things. Importantly, this category difference was greater for silhouettes than for shaded line drawings. For naming, similar category and stimulus differences were evident, but were not as pronounced. We also examined effects of prior naming on subsequent object decision performance. Repetition priming was equivalent for nonliving and living things. However, prior presentation of silhouettes (but not shaded line drawings) reduced the longer RT to nonliving things relative to living things in silhouette object decision. We propose that outline contour benefits recognition of living things more than nonliving things: For nonliving things, there may be greater 2-D/3-D interpretational ambiguity, and/or they may possess fewer salient features.

[1]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  Visual Apperceptive Agnosia: A Clinico-Anatomical Study of Three Cases , 1988, Cortex.

[2]  A. Ellis.  Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[3]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[4]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific semantic impairment for living beings , 1996 .

[5]  David Caplan,et al.  Constraining theories of semantic memory processing: Evidence from Dementia , 1992 .

[6]  M. Tarr,et al.  Differing views on views: comments on Biederman and Bar (1999) , 2000, Vision Research.

[7]  J T Townsend,et al.  Feature sensitivity, bias, and interdependencies as a function of energy and payoffs , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  H. Hughes,et al.  Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  David Gaffan,et al.  A Spurious Category-Specific Visual Agnosia for Living Things in Normal Human and Nonhuman Primates , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Semantically-bounded anomia: Implications for the neural implementation of naming , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[12]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information , 1998 .

[13]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Acquisition and Transfer of Skilled Performance: Are Visual Discrimination Skills Stimulus Specific? , 1996 .

[14]  D. Watt.  Visual Processing: Computational Psychophysical and Cognitive Research , 1990 .

[15]  The Apparent Size of Three-Dimensional Objects and Their Silhouettes: A Solid-Superiority Effect , 1988, Perception.

[16]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  W. Hayward.  Effects of outline shape in object recognition , 1998 .

[18]  T. Lloyd-Jones,et al.  A Selective Deficit for Living Things after Temporal Lobectomy for Relief of Epileptic Seizures , 2001, Brain and Language.

[19]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Are living and non-living category-specific deficits causally linked to impaired perceptual or associative knowledge? evidence from a category-specific double dissociation , 1998 .

[20]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  A verbal-semantic category-specific recognition impairment , 1993 .

[21]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[22]  John Hart,et al.  Neural subsystems for object knowledge , 1992, Nature.

[23]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[24]  M. Corballis.  Recognition of disoriented shapes. , 1988, Psychological review.

[25]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  K. Laws,et al.  A ‘normal’ category-specific advantage for naming living things , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1992 .

[28]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .

[29]  S. Lupker.  Picture Naming: An Investigation of the Nature of Categorical Priming , 1988 .

[30]  Impaired knowledge of visual and non-visual attributes in a patient with a semantic impairment for living entities: A case of a true category-specific deficit , 1998 .

[31]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[32]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[33]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .

[34]  R. Kimchi.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  M. Silveri,et al.  Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1988 .

[37]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  M J Tarr,et al.  Recognizing Silhouettes and Shaded Images across Depth Rotation , 1999, Perception.

[39]  M. Tarr,et al.  To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .

[40]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes , 1987 .

[41]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.

[42]  Irving Biederman,et al.  One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[43]  S Monsell,et al.  The Locus of Repetition Priming of Spoken Word Production , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[45]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[46]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[47]  M. Farah,et al.  A category-specific naming impairment after temporal lobectomy , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  E. Warrington,et al.  CATEGORY SPECIFIC ACCESS DYSPHASIA , 1983 .

[49]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Categorizing chairs and naming pears: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[50]  A J Parkin,et al.  Naming Impairments following Recovery from Herpes Simplex Encephalitis: Category-Specific? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[51]  T. Sanocki.  Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The organization of object knowledge: evidence from neuropsychology , 1993 .

[53]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. , 1995 .

[54]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual object processing in optic aphasia: a case of semantic access agnosia , 1987 .

[55]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[56]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts , 1992 .

[57]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[58]  R. Berndt,et al.  Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction , 1985, Nature.

[59]  J. Hodges,et al.  Deficits of semantic memory and executive control: Evidence for differing effects upon naming in dementia , 1996 .

[60]  M. Tarr,et al.  Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Response competition effects insame-different judgments , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  I. Biederman,et al.  Evidence for Complete Translational and Reflectional Invariance in Visual Object Priming , 1991, Perception.

[63]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[64]  Malou M-Louise Haine,et al.  De Wilde V. , 1986 .

[65]  M. M. Meyer,et al.  Can recognotion of living things be selectively impaired? , 1991, Neuropsychologia.