Improvisational Capabilities in e-Commerce Adoption: A Multiyear Comparison

Electronic commerce is changing the way firms conduct business. Since the market of electronic commerce has grown exponentially but changes constantly, firms have no choice but to act when faced with uncertainty. This study applies the organizational information processing theory to investigate if the fit between the firms’ outside environment and inside ability enhance business performance, which is electronic commerce processing needs and electronic commerce processing capability. More precisely, the mediation effects of improvisational capabilities were examined, for the fit concept, on performance. A three-year data sample from a survey completed by the chief information officer or a senior information systems manager from the largest 5,000 corporations in Taiwan is analyzed. The results indicate that e-commerce processing needs positively affect improvisational capabilities, which then spurs internal processes performance, encourages learning and growth, elevates customer satisfaction, and increases financial performance.

[1]  Cindy Claycomb,et al.  B2B e-commerce supply chain integration and performance: A contingency fit perspective on the role of environment , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[3]  K. Weick.  Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  A resource-based view of electronic commerce , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement? , 2009 .

[6]  Waleed A. Muhanna,et al.  IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[7]  K. Weick,et al.  Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[8]  Jyh-Jeng Wu,et al.  Building Online Transaction Trust through a Two-Step Flow of Information Communication , 2013 .

[9]  Forrest V. Morgeson,et al.  Customer Satisfaction and Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk: , 2006 .

[10]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[11]  Carl Stephen Guynes,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment on Enterprise Performance: A Case Study , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[12]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[13]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Global Technology, Local Adoption: A Cross-Country Investigation of Internet Adoption by Companies in the United States and China , 2004, Electron. Mark..

[14]  David Munro,et al.  What Is an SME , 2013 .

[15]  Nabeel Al‐Qirim,et al.  A Research Trilogy into E-Commerce Adoption in Small Businesses in New Zealand , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[16]  Eric Walden,et al.  The Impact of E-Commerce Announcements on the Market Value of Firms , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Fit, Flexibility and Performance in Manufacturing: Coping with Dynamic Environments , 2004 .

[19]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Do Competitive Priorities Drive Adoption of Electronic Commerce Applications? Testing the Contingency and Institutional Views , 2010 .

[20]  Ya-Ching Lee,et al.  Corporate Performance of ICT-Enabled Business Process Re-engineering , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[21]  Yi Wang,et al.  IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Shu Han,et al.  Diversification and Firm Performance: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Information Technology Spending , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[25]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[26]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[27]  M. Cunha,et al.  Organizational improvisation: what, when, how, and why , 1999 .

[28]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations , 2001 .

[29]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Which Came First, it or Productivity? Virtuous Cycle of Investment and Use in Enterprise Systems , 2006, ICIS.

[30]  Ali Tafti,et al.  Information Technology and Firm Profitability: Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence , 2012, MIS Q..

[31]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process , 2003 .

[33]  F. Barrett.  Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning , 1998 .

[34]  Robert F. Otondo,et al.  Social Network Services in China: An Integrated Model of Centrality, Trust, and Technology Acceptance , 2010 .

[35]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[36]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[37]  Kai Wang,et al.  Business–IT fit in e‐procurement systems: evidence from high‐technology firms in China , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[38]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[39]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution , 1995 .

[40]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[41]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  The 'Third Hand': IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Pamela E. Carter.  IT Service Value Creation in a Global Environment , 2010 .

[43]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  IS integration and business performance: The mediation effect of organizational absorptive capacity in SMEs , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[44]  Khaled A. Alshare,et al.  Examining the Moderating Role of National Culture on an Extended Technology Acceptance Model , 2011 .

[45]  Prodromos D. Chatzoglou,et al.  IT/IS implementation risks and their impact on firm performance , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[46]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Improvisation in Action , 1998 .

[47]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  IT-Enabled Business Capabilities for Turbulent Environments , 2008, MIS Q. Executive.

[49]  Ying Lu,et al.  Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination , 2011, MIS Q..

[50]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  Exploring the Relationships between Information Technology Adoption and Business Process Reengineering , 2009 .

[51]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: a meta analysis , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[52]  Hsu-Che Wu,et al.  The Development of Digital Divide Assessment Mechanism for SMEs: A Perspective from the Taiwan Manufacturing Industry , 2011 .

[53]  Varun Grover,et al.  Six Myths of Information and Markets: Information Technology Networks, Electronic Commerce, and The Battle for Consumer Surplus , 1999, MIS Q..