Fusion of real-time transrectal ultrasound with pre-acquired MRI for multi-modality prostate imaging

A system for fusion of realtime transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) with pre-acquired 3D images of the prostate was designed and demonstrated in phantoms and volunteer patients. Biopsy guides for endocavity ultrasound transducers were equipped with customized 6 degree-of-freedom (DoF) electromagnetic (EM) tracking sensors, compatible with the Aurora EM tracking system (Northern Digital Inc, NDI, Waterloo, ON, Canada). The biopsy guides were attached to an ultrasound probe and calibrated to map tracking coordinates with ultrasound image coordinates. Six cylindrical gold seeds were placed in a prostate phantom to serve as fiducial markers. The fiducials were first identified manually in 3T magnetic resonance (MR) images collected with an endorectal coil. The phantom was then imaged with tracked realtime TRUS and the fiducial markers were identified in the live image using custom software. Rigid registrations between MR and ultrasound image space were computed and evaluated using subsets of the fiducial markers. Twelve patients were scanned with 3T MRI and TRUS for biopsy and seed placement. In ten patients, volumetric ultrasound images were reconstructed from 2D sweeps of the prostate and were manually registered with the MR. The rigid registrations were used to display live TRUS images fused with spatially corresponding realtime multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs) of the MR image volume. Registration accuracy was evaluated by segmenting the prostate in the MR and volumetric ultrasound and computing distance measures between the two segmentations. In the phantom experiments, registration accuracies of 2.2 to 2.3 mm were achieved. In the patient studies, the average root mean square distance between the MR and TRUS segmentations was 3.1 mm, the average Hausdorff distance was 9.8 mm. Deformation of the prostate during MR and TRUS scan was identified as the primary source of error. Realtime MR/TRUS image fusion is feasible and is a promising approach to improved target visualization during TRUS-guided biopsy or therapy procedures.

[1]  O Henriksen,et al.  Quantitation of blood‐brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium‐DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  W D Richard,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging with stereotactic ultrasonography. , 1994, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[3]  J. Waterton,et al.  Three-dimensional freehand ultrasound: image reconstruction and volume analysis. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  R W Prager,et al.  Rapid calibration for 3-D freehand ultrasound. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  W. Fair,et al.  Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[6]  D. Johnston,et al.  A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[7]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Inside Closed MRI Scanner with Remote Actuation, under Real-Time Image Guidance , 2002, MICCAI.

[9]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[10]  Mark Rijpkema,et al.  Combined quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopic imaging of human prostate cancer , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  R. Macchia Biopsy of the prostate--an ongoing evolution. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[12]  W. Golder Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Clinical Oncology , 2004, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[13]  V. Pansadoro,et al.  Prostate cancer: evaluation with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2004, La Radiologia medica.

[14]  R. Macchia EDITORIAL: BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE—AN ONGOING EVOLUTION , 2004 .

[15]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results , 2004, Medical physics.

[16]  Hedvig Hricak,et al.  Pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer: role of MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Magnetic Resonance-guided Prostate Interventions , 2005, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2005 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  D. Mcleod,et al.  Update on magnetic resonance imaging, ProstaScint, and novel imaging in prostate cancer* , 2005, Current opinion in urology.

[20]  Vladimir Bilim,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer , 2005, The Prostate.

[21]  Seong Ho Park,et al.  Wash‐in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI: Usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[23]  R Kikinis,et al.  Robot-assisted needle placement in open MRI: System architecture, integration and validation , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.