Comparison of Two Methods for Texture Image Classification

As the development of computer vision, texture becomes a key component for human visual perception and plays an important role in image-related applications. This paper compares two methods for texture image classification. The first scheme has an advantage that all the texture features are derived from wavelet transform, and it can reduce the time complexity of texture features extraction. The other method combines perceptual texture features and Gabor wavelet features for texture image classification. We test our proposed method using the Brodatz texture database, and the experimental results are compared.

[1]  Muwei Jian,et al.  Combining Perceptual Texture Features and Wavelet Features for Texture Image Classification , 2009 .

[2]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  A Multi-User 3-D Virtual Environment with Interactive Collaboration and Shared Whiteboard Technologies , 2003, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[3]  Fang Liu,et al.  Periodicity, Directionality, and Randomness: Wold Features for Image Modeling and Retrieval , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Statistical Learning Theory: Models, Concepts, and Results , 2008, Inductive Logic.

[5]  Muwei Jian,et al.  DynaNP - A Coarse-grain Dataflow Network Processor Architecture with Dynamic Configurable Processing Path , 2007 .

[6]  Sebastiano Battiato,et al.  Perceptive visual texture classification and retrieval , 2003, 12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 2003.Proceedings..

[7]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  A comparison of wavelet transform features for texture image annotation , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[8]  Shawn Newsam,et al.  A texture descriptor for image retrieval and browsing , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries (CBAIVL'99).

[9]  Minh N. Do,et al.  Texture similarity measurement using Kullback-Leibler distance on wavelet subbands , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[10]  Phil Brodatz,et al.  Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers , 1966 .

[11]  Hideyuki Tamura,et al.  Textural Features Corresponding to Visual Perception , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis , 1990, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  A texture descriptor for browsing and similarity retrieval , 2000, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[14]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[15]  Junyu Dong,et al.  New Texture Features Based on Wavelet Transform Coinciding with Human Visual Perception , 2007, Eighth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD 2007).

[16]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Quad-tree segmentation for texture-based image query , 1994, MULTIMEDIA '94.

[17]  Fatos T. Yarman-Vural,et al.  SASI: a generic texture descriptor for image retrieval , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Fundamentals of Content-Based Image Retrieval , 2003 .

[19]  Muwei Jian,et al.  Texture Image Classification Using Perceptual Texture Features and Gabor Wavelet Features , 2009, 2009 Asia-Pacific Conference on Information Processing.

[20]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[21]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Texture classification and segmentation using multiresolution simultaneous autoregressive models , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[22]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..