Fairness and Trust in Virtual Environments: The Effects of Reputation

Reputation supports pro-social behaviors in a variety of social settings and across different ages. When re-encounters are possible, developing a positive reputation can be a valuable asset that will result in better outcomes. However, in real life, cooperative acts are ambiguous and happen in noisy environments in which individuals can have multiple goals, visibility is reduced, and reputation systems may differ. This study examined how reputation within a virtual environment affects fairness in material allocations and trust in information exchange, in a three-actors interaction game in which each player had an incentive to deceive the others. We compared the results of two experimental conditions, one in which informers could be evaluated, and one without reputational opportunities. A reputational system appeared to enhance both trust and fairness even within a virtual environment under anonymous condition. We tested adolescents and adults finding that they were consistently more generous when visibility was increased, but they showed significantly different patterns in resources allocation and information exchange. Male and female participants, across ages, showed other interesting differences. These findings suggest that reputational effects increase fairness and trust even in a noisy, ambiguous and uncertain environment, but this effect is modulated by age and gender.

[1]  J. Benenson,et al.  Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game , 2007 .

[2]  Jaak Panksepp,et al.  Feeling the Pain of Social Loss , 2003, Science.

[3]  Franco Bagnoli,et al.  Conformity in Virtual Environments: A Hybrid Neurophysiological and Psychosocial Approach , 2016, INSCI.

[4]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  On inequity aversion: A reply to Binmore and Shaked , 2009 .

[5]  S. Reicher,et al.  Delinquency: Cause or Consequence of Social Exclusion? , 2005 .

[6]  Kelly Anderson,et al.  Prosocial Behavior , 2009 .

[7]  Daniel Jones,et al.  Wallflowers: Experimental Evidence of an Aversion to Standing Out , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  Gossip as Cultural Learning , 2004 .

[9]  Sanaa Ghouzali,et al.  Trust and Reputation Management in Healthcare Systems: Taxonomy, Requirements and Open Issues , 2018, IEEE Access.

[10]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social Heuristics and Social Roles: Intuition Favors Altruism for Women But Not for Men , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Spontaneous Altruism by Chimpanzees and Young Children , 2007, PLoS biology.

[12]  M. Gluckman,et al.  Papers in Honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and Scandal , 1963, Current Anthropology.

[13]  Robert C. Ellickson,et al.  Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes , 1991 .

[14]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[15]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Roz Dixon,et al.  Ostracism , 2007 .

[17]  The Hidden Cost of Insurance on Cooperation , 2017 .

[18]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè,et al.  Using Local Trust for Forming Cohesive Social Structures in Virtual Communities , 2017, Comput. J..

[19]  Tom Postmes,et al.  When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. , 2002 .

[20]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Reputation, a universal currency for human social interactions , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè,et al.  Combining trust and skills evaluation to form e-Learning classes in online social networks , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[23]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Generalized Linear Mixed Models , 2005 .

[24]  Alex Shaw,et al.  Young Children Are More Generous When Others Are Aware of Their Actions , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[26]  Bianca Beersma,et al.  Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences , 2012 .

[27]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity , 2016 .

[28]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[29]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Personality and cognitive style as predictors of preference for working in virtual teams , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  F. Giardini,et al.  Partner Selection Supported by Opaque Reputation Promotes Cooperative Behavior , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[31]  N. Emler A Social Psychology of Reputation , 1990 .

[32]  F. Giardini,et al.  Exploring Reputation-Based Cooperation: , 2016 .

[33]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  Gender Differences in Altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and Actual Behaviour , 2016, Economics Letters.

[34]  Kathryn S. Steinberg,et al.  The Effects of Race, Gender, and Marital Status on Giving and Volunteering in Indiana , 2006 .

[35]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity , 2005, Nature.

[36]  Denis Trček Computational Trust and Reputation Management , 2018 .

[37]  Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde,et al.  The influence of prior reputation and reciprocity on dynamic trust-building in adults with and without autism spectrum disorder , 2018, Cognition.

[38]  Daniel Balliet,et al.  Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  J. Hattie,et al.  Establishing and Maintaining Reputations Through Risk-Taking Behavior , 2009 .

[40]  Jennifer Stellar,et al.  The virtues of gossip: reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Christopher Wimer,et al.  What drives the gender gap in charitable giving? Lower empathy leads men to give less to poverty relief. , 2015, Social science research.

[42]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .

[43]  W. Przepiorka,et al.  Order without law: Reputation promotes cooperation in a cryptomarket for illegal drugs , 2017 .

[44]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[45]  Jesse M. Bering,et al.  Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game , 2008 .

[46]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[47]  Á. Sánchez,et al.  Transition from reciprocal cooperation to persistent behaviour in social dilemmas at the end of adolescence , 2014, Nature Communications.

[48]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Egalitarian motives in humans , 2007, Nature.

[49]  Ben Jann,et al.  Reputation Formation and the Evolution of Cooperation in Anonymous Online Markets , 2014 .

[50]  Rosaria Conte,et al.  Gossip for social control in natural and artificial societies , 2012, Simul..

[51]  Y. Farmer Ethical Decision Making and Reputation Management in Public Relations , 2018 .

[52]  Denis Trček,et al.  A Brief Overview of Trust and Reputation over Various Domains , 2018 .

[53]  I. Apperly What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .