Towards an Integrated Third-Trimester Screening in Pregnancy

cy. Indeed, the role of the placenta in late-onset PE and IUGR is still in need of clarification. Late-onset PE seems to be much more dependent on the influence of maternal factors, and a proportion of cases occur with normal uterine artery Doppler and angiogenic factors, and consequently with a normal placenta [4] . On the other hand, abnormal fetal growth late in pregnancy is probably a common diagnosis for several entities, some of which seem to be related with abnormal placentation while others do not [5] . Despite an overall lower rate of severe complications, the prevalence of late pregnancy PE and IUGR is much higher than that of earlier forms and this results in an important impact on pregnancy outcomes and incurred costs [6] . In addition, serious complications still occur. Severe PE and/or HELLP syndrome at term is certainly possible, with important consumption of resources and the risk of severe maternal complications. Likewise, unrecognized (early and) late-onset forms of IUGR are still today estimated to be involved in more than 50% of stillbirths [7] . It seems clear that, at least with current means, improving prediction of late-onset PE and IUGR cannot be achieved early in gestation. However, a different approach that comes closer in time to the onset of the disease should improve the detection rates. Is that worthResearch during the last 20 years has largely focused on the development of screening approaches allowing the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) as early as possible in pregnancy [1] . We know today that this is only possible with a high accuracy for the early-onset forms. Poor early pregnancy placentation has a causal association with the early-onset forms of these diseases [2] , which actually often present together. Abnormal placentation can be detected by increased uterine artery Doppler and by reduced levels of angiogenic placental proteins such as placental growth factor. Evidence has demonstrated that first-trimester screening strategies combining maternal baseline factors, uterine artery Doppler and maternal biomarkers can be extremely powerful to detect the early-onset, severe forms of PE and IUGR, with detection rates in excess of 90 and 75%, respectively [1] . Early detection of high-risk patients opens opportunities for early therapy that might reduce the risk or delay the onset of these complications [3] . However, first-trimester strategies have normally shown poorer predictive values for late-onset forms of PE and IUGR. This has normally been attributed to the milder nature of the disease, where changes can possibly not be picked up that early in gestation, combined with the heterogeneity of these clinical conditions late in pregnanPublished online: April 19, 2013

[1]  R. Romero,et al.  Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors in the third trimester of pregnancy to identify the patient at risk for stillbirth at or near term and severe late preeclampsia. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Maternal Serum Placental Growth Factor, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A and Free β-Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin at 30-33 Weeks in the Prediction of Pre-Eclampsia , 2013, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[3]  Etty Daniel-Spiegel,et al.  [TURNING THE PYRAMID IN PRENATAL CARE]. , 2015, Harefuah.

[4]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Systolic, Diastolic and Mean Arterial Pressure at 30-33 Weeks in the Prediction of Preeclampsia , 2013, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[5]  A. Shennan,et al.  An economic analysis of induction of labour and expectant monitoring in women with gestational hypertension or pre‐eclampsia at term (HYPITAT trial) , 2010, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  Asad Malik,et al.  Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study , 2013, BMJ.

[7]  An economic analysis of induction of labour and expectant monitoring in women with gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia at term (HYPITAT trial) , 2010 .

[8]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Placental angiogenic growth factors and uterine artery Doppler findings for characterization of different subsets in preeclampsia and in isolated intrauterine growth restriction. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  A. Golan,et al.  The placental factor in early- and late-onset normotensive fetal growth restriction. , 2013, Placenta.

[10]  Yves Giguère,et al.  Early Administration of Low-Dose Aspirin for the Prevention of Severe and Mild Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, American Journal of Perinatology.

[11]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Increased Fetal Brain Perfusion and Neonatal Neurobehavioral Performance in Normally Grown Fetuses , 2013, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[12]  R. Romero,et al.  The "Great Obstetrical Syndromes" are associated with disorders of deep placentation. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Uterine Artery Doppler at 30-33 Weeks' Gestation in the Prediction of Preeclampsia , 2013, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[14]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Maternal Serum Soluble Endoglin at 30-33 Weeks in the Prediction of Preeclampsia , 2012, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[15]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[16]  K. Joseph,et al.  Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. , 2011, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.