Fundamental Differences Between Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Micro-EHL Results

Numerical analyses of micro-EHL problems have shown remarkably different results with Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models. However, no consensus has been reached whether a Newtonian model can be used in micro-EHL analysis. It is difficult to prove the point numerically as researchers use different numerical methods, grid sizes, time steps, and convergence criteria. This paper analytically studies the fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results. Algebraic governing equations are derived in terms of dimensionless parameters of the problem. Results are obtained for a range of key dimensionless parameters of practical interest. These results suggest that Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results would be qualitatively different and the differences would be most pronounced with surface roughness of short wavelengths. Since surface roughness of machine elements contains substantial short-wavelength contents, a Newtonian rheological model is likely to generate misleading micro-EHL results under all operating conditions under which the shear-thinning effect of the lubricant is significant

[1]  K. Johnson,et al.  Regimes of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication , 1970 .

[2]  J. L. Tevaarwerk,et al.  Shear behaviour of elastohydrodynamic oil films , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  H. Cheng,et al.  An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication , 1978 .

[4]  T. F. Conry,et al.  The Effects of Surface Irregularities on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Sliding Line Contacts. Part II—Wavy Surfaces , 1984 .

[5]  K. Johnson.  Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[6]  R. Bosma,et al.  The Influence of Longitudinal and Transverse Roughness on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Circular Contacts , 1988 .

[7]  Henry Peredur Evans,et al.  Micro-Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of an Elliptical Contact With Transverse and Three-Dimensional Sinusoidal Roughness , 1989 .

[8]  M. N. Webster,et al.  A Study of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces , 1991 .

[9]  Farshid Sadeghi.  A Comparison of the Fluid Models Effect on the Internal Stresses of Rough Surfaces , 1991 .

[10]  A. A. Elsharkawy,et al.  Subsurface Stresses in Micro-EHL Line Contacts , 1991 .

[11]  L. Chang.  Traction in thermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rough surfaces , 1992 .

[12]  W. E. ten Napel,et al.  Surface roughness effects in an EHL line contact , 1992 .

[13]  Henry Peredur Evans,et al.  Simulation of Elastohydrodynamic Contacts Between Rough Surfaces , 1992 .

[14]  J. A. Greenwood,et al.  The behaviour of transverse roughness in sliding elastohydrodynamically lubricated contacts , 1992 .

[15]  Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of smooth and rough surfaces , 1993 .

[16]  A. Jackson,et al.  On the Pressure Rippling and Roughness Deformation in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces , 1993 .

[17]  Herbert S. Cheng,et al.  A Transient EHL Analysis for Line Contacts With Measured Surface Roughness Using Multigrid Technique , 1994 .

[18]  Liming Chang,et al.  Wavelength dependence of micro-EHL pressure rippling with random surface-roughness profiles , 1995 .