Managerial Ties and Firm Innovation: Is Knowledge Creation a Missing Link?†

Managerial ties, the personal networks of senior managers, have been found to be facilitators of firm performance because of their network benefits. However, social network theory suggests that managerial ties only play a "conduit" role by providing possibilities and opportunities to approach external resources. How can firms turn these possibilities and opportunities into internal knowledge assets and further transform them into firm innovation? Extant research constructs a direct mechanism for the managerial ties-firm innovation link. The research reported here, however, provides and investigates an indirect ties-innovation argument where organizational knowledge creation processes, including knowledge exchange and knowledge combination, are mediators. And managerial ties are examined through two traditional dimensions, business ties and political ties. This study employs empirical data from 270 firms in China and uses structural equation modeling techniques to reveal interesting findings. First, the results support the key argument that the influence of managerial ties on firm innovation is indirect. Second, knowledge exchange and knowledge combination are different constructs and the former positively influences the latter. More interestingly, business ties can exert a significant direct impact on both knowledge exchange and knowledge combination, while political ties can only influence knowledge exchange directly. Although both knowledge exchange and knowledge combination impact product innovation directly, only knowledge combination can directly influence process innovation. These findings indicate that the role of political ties is declining, but business ties still have substantial influence on firm innovation in transitional China. Different processes of organizational knowledge creation, such as knowledge exchange and knowledge combination, make distinct contributions to firm innovation. Product innovation, as opposed to process innovation, is more externally oriented and needs more organizational level knowledge creation activities. This article extends the understanding of the ties-innovation link, organizational knowledge creation theory, and firm innovation in a transitional economy by providing a more complete understanding of how firms can access and internalize external resources and then transform them into product innovation and process innovation. © 2011 Product Development & Management Association.

[1]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of R&D–Marketing NPD Integration in Chinese Firms: The Guanxi Effect , 2009 .

[2]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[3]  D. Teece Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[4]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China , 2001 .

[5]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[6]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[7]  R. Grover,et al.  From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[8]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[9]  Chao C. Chen,et al.  On the Intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi: A Process Model of Guanxi Development , 2004 .

[10]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  Determinants of the Level of Knowledge Application: A Knowledge‐Based and Information‐Processing Perspective* , 2005 .

[11]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[12]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[13]  Brent D. Rosso,et al.  GIVING COMMITMENT: EMPLOYEE SUPPORT PROGRAMS AND THE PROSOCIAL SENSEMAKING PROCESS , 2008 .

[14]  J. Füller,et al.  Brand Community Members as a Source of Innovation , 2008 .

[15]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[16]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[17]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[18]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  V. A. Thompson Bureaucracy and innovation , 1969 .

[20]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[21]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  What separates Japanese new product winners from losers , 1996 .

[22]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[23]  C. Moorman,et al.  Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines , 2008 .

[24]  Mike W. Peng Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices , 2003 .

[25]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[26]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[27]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[28]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  William E. Souder,et al.  New Product Development Performance and the Interaction of Cross‐Functional Integration and Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[30]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[31]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[32]  M. Knudsen The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success , 2007 .

[33]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[34]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[35]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  Xinchun Li,et al.  Managerial ties, firm resources, and performance of cluster firms , 2008 .

[37]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[39]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[40]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[41]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  How Network Strategies and Institutional Transitions Evolve in Asia , 2005 .

[42]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link , 2000 .

[43]  Brian P. Flaherty,et al.  An Alternative Framework for Defining Mediation. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[44]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[45]  Lee Sproull,et al.  More Than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[46]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach* , 2008 .

[47]  David J. Miller,et al.  The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy , 1987 .

[48]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[49]  M. Boisot,et al.  From Fiefs to Clans and Network Capitalism: Explaining China's Emerging Economic Order , 1996 .

[50]  Dali L. Yang Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China , 2004 .

[51]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms , 2005 .

[52]  Alex S. L. Tsang,et al.  Power, conflict, and cooperation: The impact of guanxi in Chinese marketing channels , 2010 .

[53]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: Organization and Management in the Midst of Societal Transformation: The People's Republic of China , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Xu Jiang,et al.  An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: The case of alliances , 2009 .

[55]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[56]  Kai Xu,et al.  Managerial ties, absorptive capacity, and innovation , 2008 .

[57]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[58]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness? , 2009 .

[59]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[60]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[61]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[62]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[63]  Yadong Luo Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: the case of China , 2003 .

[64]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations , 2001 .

[65]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[66]  Wai-sum Siu,et al.  Network Strategies of Small Chinese High-Technology Firms: A Qualitative Study , 2007 .

[67]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances , 2006 .

[68]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[69]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[70]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Innovation: The Case of Business‐to‐Business Services* , 2006 .

[71]  Joe Tidd,et al.  Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks the case of home automation , 1995 .

[72]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective , 2001 .

[73]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[74]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[75]  R. Handfield,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms* , 2009 .

[76]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[77]  K. Zhou,et al.  Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms , 2008 .

[78]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[79]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[80]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[81]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[82]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[83]  Lisa C . Troy,et al.  Cross-Functional Integration and New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of the Findings , 2008 .