Methodology for the Differential Diagnosis of a Complex Data Set

Data from routine CT scan examinations are employed to illustrate the use of the polychotomous logistic regression model as a statistical diagnostic tool. The assumptions of the model, the interpretation of its parameters, and its capabilities are described in detail. In carrying out the analysis on the CT data, a large, relatively sparse data set, many technical difficulties were encountered. Modifications to the methodology that were necessary to permit its implementation are described, and it is demonstrated that an unbiased analysis of T + 1 diagnostic categories can be implemented by separately performing T individual simple logistic analyses. The limitations of the methodology are discussed. It is hoped that this paper may serve as a basis for the practical implementation of the polychotomous logistic model in similar diagnostic settings.

[1]  Day Ne,et al.  A GENERAL MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD DISCRIMINANT , 1967 .

[2]  J. Anderson.  Separate sample logistic discrimination , 1972 .

[3]  S. Dolgin,et al.  Identification of patients with cholesterol or pigment gallstones by discriminant analysis of radiographic features. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  B J McNeil,et al.  Utilization of computed tomography of the head in a tertiary care hospital. , 1981, Radiology.

[5]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  The usefulness of a predictive instrument to reduce inappropriate admissions to the coronary care unit. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[6]  C R Scriver,et al.  The use of biochemical data in screening for mutant alleles and in genetic counselling * , 1974, Annals of human genetics.

[7]  J. A. Anderson,et al.  Diagnosis by Logistic Discriminant Function: Further Practical Problems and Results , 1974 .

[8]  John Aitchison,et al.  Statistical diagnosis when basic cases are not classified with certainty , 1976 .

[9]  J. Habbema,et al.  The measurement of performance in probabilistic diagnosis. III. Methods based on continuous functions of the diagnostic probabilities. , 1978, Methods of information in medicine.

[10]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant Analysis , 1968 .

[11]  D. Titterington,et al.  Comparison of Discrimination Techniques Applied to a Complex Data Set of Head Injured Patients , 1981 .

[12]  A P Dawid,et al.  Properties of diagnostic data distributions. , 1976, Biometrics.

[13]  R A Greenes,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. , 1983, Biometrics.