An improved derandomized approximation algorithm for the max-controlled set problem

A vertex i of a graph G=(V,E) is said to be controlled by M ⊆ V if the majority of the elements of the neighborhood of i (including itself) belong to M. The set M is a monopoly in G if every vertex i ∈ V is controlled by M. Given a set M ⊆ V and two graphs G 1=(V,E 1) and G 2=(V,E 2) where E 1 ⊆ E 2, the monopoly verification problem (mvp) consists of deciding whether there exists a sandwich graph G=(V,E) (i.e., a graph where E 1 ⊆ E ⊆ E 2) such that M is a monopoly in G=(V,E). If the answer to the mvp is No, we then consider the max-controlled set problem (mcsp), whose objective is to find a sandwich graph G=(V,E) such that the number of vertices of G controlled by M is maximized. The mvp can be solved in polynomial time; the mcsp, however, is NP-hard. In this work, we present a deterministic polynomial time approximation algorithm for the mcsp with ratio \(\frac{1}{2}+ \frac{1+\sqrt{n}}{2n-2}\), where n=|V|>4. (The case n ≤ 4 is solved exactly by considering the parameterized version of the mcsp.) The algoritm is obtained through the use of randomized rounding and derandomization techniques, namely the method of conditional expectations. Additionally, we show how to improve this ratio if good estimates of expectation are obtained in advance.

[1]  Sanjeev Arora,et al.  Probabilistic checking of proofs: a new characterization of NP , 1998, JACM.

[2]  Haim Kaplan,et al.  Physical Maps and Interval Sandwich Problems: Bounded Degrees Help , 1996, ISTCS.

[3]  Haim Kaplan,et al.  Bounded Degree Interval Sandwich Problems , 1999, Algorithmica.

[4]  Subhash Khot On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games , 2002, STOC '02.

[5]  Michael E. Saks,et al.  Sphere packing and local majorities in graphs , 1993, [1993] The 2nd Israel Symposium on Theory and Computing Systems.

[6]  Devdatt P. Dubhashi,et al.  Balls and bins: A study in negative dependence , 1996, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[7]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Randomized algorithms , 1996, CSUR.

[8]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  An Optimal Algorithm for Monte Carlo Estimation , 2000, SIAM J. Comput..

[9]  Rajiv Gandhi,et al.  Dependent rounding and its applications to approximation algorithms , 2006, JACM.

[10]  Michael R. Fellows,et al.  FIXED-PARAMETER TRACTABILITY AND COMPLETENESS , 2022 .

[11]  D. Rose A GRAPH-THEORETIC STUDY OF THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF SPARSE POSITIVE DEFINITE SYSTEMS OF LINEAR EQUATIONS , 1972 .

[12]  M. Yannakakis Computing the Minimum Fill-in is NP^Complete , 1981 .

[13]  Narendra Karmarkar,et al.  A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming , 1984, Comb..

[14]  Stephen J. Wright Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods , 1997, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics.

[15]  Stéphane Pérennes,et al.  The Power of Small Coalitions in Graphs , 2003, Discret. Appl. Math..

[16]  D. Peleg Local Majority Voting, Small Coalitions and Controlling Monopolies in Graphs: A Review , 1996 .

[17]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Minimal Social Laws , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[18]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Emergent Conventions in Multi-Agent Systems: Initial Experimental Results and Observations (Preliminary Report) , 1992, KR.

[19]  Kazuhisa Makino,et al.  Max- and Min-Neighborhood Monopolies , 2002, Algorithmica.

[20]  Prabhakar Raghavan,et al.  Randomized rounding: A technique for provably good algorithms and algorithmic proofs , 1985, Comb..

[21]  Martin Charles Golumbic,et al.  Graph Sandwich Problems , 1995, J. Algorithms.

[22]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  On the Synthesis of Useful Social Laws for Artificial Agent Societies (Preliminary Report) , 1992, AAAI.