Whatever happened to the group in social psychology

Abstract For a decade following World War II social psychologists tended to view the individual as an element in a larger system. Research on small groups prospered, and attitudes and social perceptions were conceived to be antecedents and consequences of group activity. But by the 1960's social psychology had become much more individualistic. Interest in the group as a system had waned and research was generally focused on intraindividual events or processes that mediate responses to social situations. We now appear to be passing through a period of transition during which both the content and methodology of past research are being re-evaluated, and from which new trends are likely to emerge. Possible explanations of the changing orientation of social psychology are discussed, and predictions are advanced concerning future developments. It is suggested that social psychologists are responsive to the mood of the times, and that recent social and political unheavals presage a revival of the collectivistic approach.

[1]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  Personality and social change , 1943 .

[2]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[3]  Carl I. Hovland,et al.  Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. , 1959 .

[4]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[5]  M. Smith Is Psychology Relevant to New Priorities , 1973 .

[6]  I. Steiner Interpersonal behavior as influenced by accuracy of social perception. , 1955, Psychological review.

[7]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[8]  J. B. Sidowski,et al.  The influence of reinforcement and punishment in a minimal social situation. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  K. Gergen Social Psychology as History , 1973 .

[10]  N. Triplett,et al.  The Dynamogenic Factors in Pacemaking and Competition , 1898 .

[11]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[12]  G. Āllport The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[13]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[14]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social psychology : an experimental approach , 1966 .

[15]  Harold H. Kelley,et al.  Effects of different types of interdependence and response conditions in the minimal social situation , 1966 .

[16]  R. Sears A theoretical framework for personality and social behavior. , 1951 .

[17]  E. Hilgard Lewin's Topological and Vector Psychology. , 1948 .

[18]  Hadley Cantril,et al.  The psychology of social movements , 1941 .

[19]  A. W. Wicker Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects. , 1969 .

[20]  E. Aronson,et al.  The Social Animal , 1973 .

[21]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[22]  G. Mead The Social Self. , 2011, Psychiatry.

[23]  K. Lewin,et al.  Resolving Social Conflicts , 1948 .

[24]  D. Bem Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[25]  H. Kelley Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[26]  F. Heider,et al.  Principles of topological psychology , 1936 .

[27]  Gardner Murphy,et al.  Experimental social psychology. , 1934 .

[28]  C. Cooley Human nature and the social order , 1902 .

[29]  J MACY,et al.  Coding noise in a task-oriented group. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[30]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[31]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[32]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Problem solving by small groups using various communication nets. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[33]  D. Katz,et al.  Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. , 1933 .

[34]  R. Helmreich,et al.  The Study of Small Groups , 1973 .

[35]  W. Mcguire The Yin and Yang of Progress in Social Psychology: Seven Koan. , 1973 .

[36]  N. Lewis A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .