Research Considerations for Managing Future Unmanned Systems

The next generation of unmanned systems (UxVs) will require a significantly different relationship with operators than what is implemented to date. Unmanned systems will perform an increasing number of missions in the future, with expanded capabilities. Furthermore, there is a major push to reduce the manning requirements for UxV missions from what is typical today. Operators of these next generation systems will become supervisory controllers of increasingly advanced automation. Research is required to better understand the information requirements for operators to effectively supervise these new systems. Metrics and concepts of employment are required to define what it means to safely and efficiently conduct missions in this future supervisory control context. We contend that establishing context dependent, operator state and mission performance metrics will be critical for assessing different control paradigms and user interfaces. Additionally, realistic synthetic environments are necessary to adequately assess the performance impacts of the various mission contexts an operator will encounter. This paper suggests research foci that would be useful in defining the roles and information requirements for human operators of these next generation unmanned systems.

[1]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[2]  Jeremiah Gertler U.S. Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2012 .

[3]  T. Jung,et al.  Task performance and eye activity: predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  P. Caffier,et al.  Experimental evaluation of eye-blink parameters as a drowsiness measure , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[5]  Daniel Goldberg,et al.  Testing Adaptive Levels of Automation (ALOA) for UAV Supervisory Control , 2007 .

[6]  A. K. Blangsted,et al.  The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[7]  Richard Egan,et al.  Proposed Functional Architecture and Associated Benefits Analysis of a Common Ground Control Station for Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2010 .

[8]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT) , 1988, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[9]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Supervisory Control of Multiple Robots: Human-Performance Issues and User-Interface Design , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[10]  Sandra P Marshall,et al.  Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[11]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[12]  Kevin W Williams,et al.  A Summary of Unmanned Aircraft Accident/Incident Data: Human Factors Implications , 2004 .

[13]  C. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs , 2008 .

[14]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Single operator, multiple robots: an eye movement based theoretic model of operator situation awareness , 2010, HRI 2010.

[16]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Adaptable and Adaptive Automation for Supervisory Control of Multiple Autonomous Vehicles , 2012 .

[17]  Heath A. Ruff,et al.  Effect of Level of Automation on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Routing Task , 2009 .

[18]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[19]  David Carr,et al.  Implications for unmanned systems research of military UAV mishap statistics , 2013, 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[20]  Carl Nehme,et al.  Modeling human supervisory control in heterogeneous unmanned vehicle systems , 2009 .

[21]  Joseph T. Coyne,et al.  Pupil Dilation as an Index of Learning , 2011 .

[22]  Birsen Donmez,et al.  Modeling Workload Impact in Multiple Unmanned Vehicle Supervisory Control , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[23]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Modeling multiple human operators in the supervisory control of heterogeneous unmanned vehicles , 2009, PerMIS.