What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Spalding. The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.
[2] D. L. Macadam. Visual Sensitivities to Color Differences in Daylight , 1942 .
[3] U. Neisser. VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.
[4] J. Beck. Perceptual Grouping Produced by Changes in Orientation and Shape , 1966, Science.
[5] J Brand,et al. Classification without Identification in Visual Search , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[6] R. Shiffrin,et al. Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.
[7] J. Jonides,et al. A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .
[8] J. M. FINDLAY. Feature Detectors and Vernier Acuity , 1973, Nature.
[9] R. A. Kinchla,et al. Detecting a target letter in briefly presented arrays: A confidence rating analysis in terms of a weighted additive effects model , 1974 .
[10] U. Frith. Acurious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema , 1974 .
[11] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[12] L Chen,et al. Topological structure in visual perception. , 1982, Science.
[13] A. Treisman,et al. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[14] BELA JULESZ,et al. Rapid discrimination of visual patterns , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[15] B. Julesz,et al. Human factors and behavioral science: Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.
[16] J. Duncan. Category effects in visual search: A failure to replicate the “oh-zero” phenomenon , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.
[17] B. Julesz. A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.
[18] L. E. Krueger. The category effect in visual search depends on physical rather than conceptual differences , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[19] A. Treisman,et al. Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[20] J M Rubin,et al. Topological perception: Holes in an experiment , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[21] R. Desimone,et al. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.
[22] Ken Nakayama,et al. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.
[23] A. Treisman,et al. Illusory words: the roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] S Ullman,et al. Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. , 1987, Science.
[25] D. Badcock,et al. Processing feature density in preattentive perception , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] D Sagi,et al. The combination of spatial frequency and orientation is effortlessly perceived , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[27] Jon Driver,et al. Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.
[28] A Treisman,et al. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.
[29] C. H. Hansen,et al. Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[30] V. S. Ramachandran,et al. Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.
[31] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Binocularity and visual search , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[32] G. Moraglia. Visual Search: Spatial Frequency and Orientation , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.
[33] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[34] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[35] J. R. Pomerantz,et al. Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] G. Moraglia,et al. Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[37] L. Chen,et al. Holes and wholes: A reply to Rubin and Kanwisher , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[38] A. Nagy,et al. Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[39] John K. Tsotsos. Analyzing vision at the complexity level , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[40] P. Cavanagh,et al. Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[41] G R Grice,et al. Redundancy phenomena are affected by response requirements , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[42] S. Yantis,et al. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[43] Manfred Fahle,et al. Parallel perception of vernier offsets, curvature, and chevrons in humans , 1991, Vision Research.
[44] O. Braddick,et al. Serial Search for Targets Defined by Divergence or Deformation of Optic Flow , 1991, Perception.
[45] G. Humphreys,et al. Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[46] D. Foster,et al. Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[47] Michael D'Zmura,et al. Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.
[48] M. Cheal,et al. Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[49] J M Wolfe,et al. Curvature is a Basic Feature for Visual Search Tasks , 1992, Perception.
[50] J. Wolfe,et al. The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[51] Zijiang J. He,et al. Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.
[52] P. McLeod,et al. Are direction and speed coded independently by the visual system? Evidence from visual search. , 1992, Spatial vision.
[53] James M. Brown,et al. Visual search for simple volumetric shapes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[54] R. Shiffrin,et al. Automatization and training in visual search. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.
[55] B Julesz,et al. Perceptual asymmetry in texture perception. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[56] J. Wolfe. “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search are not the same thing , 1992, Vision Research.
[57] H. Nothdurft. Faces and Facial Expressions do not Pop Out , 1993, Perception.
[58] I Kovács,et al. A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[59] Alastair G. Gale,et al. Visual search 2 , 1993 .
[60] James Elder,et al. A measure of closure , 1994, Vision Research.
[61] J. Theeuwes,et al. Parallel Search for a Conjunction of Shape and Contrast Polarity , 1994 .
[62] P Cavanagh,et al. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[63] J. Theeuwes,et al. Parallel search for a conjunction of contrast polarity and shape , 1994, Vision Research.
[64] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[65] P. Cavanagh,et al. FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT , 1995 .
[66] J M Wolfe,et al. Part—whole information is useful in visual search for size × size but not orientation × orientation conjunctions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[67] J. Theeuwes. Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[68] James T. Enns,et al. Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995 .
[69] Yehoshua Tsal,et al. Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. , 1995 .
[70] M. V. von Grünau,et al. The Detection of Gaze Direction: A Stare-In-The-Crowd Effect , 1995, Perception.
[71] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995, Psychological review.
[72] S. Grossberg. The Attentive Brain , 1995 .
[73] M. Potter,et al. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[74] John H. R. Maunsell,et al. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.
[75] P. Perona,et al. Preattentive Perception of Elementary Three-dimensional Shapes , 1996, Vision Research.
[76] W. Cowan,et al. Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.
[77] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection , 1996 .
[78] D. Purcell,et al. It Takes a Confounded Face to Pop Out of a Crowd , 1996, Perception.
[79] T. Takeuchi,et al. Visual search of expansion and contraction , 1997, Vision Research.
[80] R. M. Jensen,et al. Is visual attention automatically attracted by one’s own name? , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.
[81] A. O'Toole,et al. On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: Evidence from visual search , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.
[82] J. Wolfe,et al. Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.
[83] M. Goldsmith. What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. , 1998 .
[84] J. Wolfe,et al. What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .
[85] Alinda Friedman,et al. Grouping and detecting vertices in 2-D, 3-D, and quasi-3-D objects , 1998 .
[86] M. Eckstein. The Lower Visual Search Efficiency for Conjunctions Is Due to Noise and not Serial Attentional Processing , 1998 .
[87] B. Dosher,et al. External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.
[88] J. Wolfe,et al. Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.
[89] K. Nakayama,et al. Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[90] M. Carrasco,et al. Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.
[91] Preeti Verghese,et al. The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.
[92] P U Tse,et al. Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[93] N. Haslam,et al. Visual search: Efficiency continuum or distinct processes? , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[94] P. Malinowski,et al. The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: Evidence for learned basic features , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[95] V. Lollo,et al. The preattentive emperor has no clothes: a dynamic redressing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[96] Constance S. Royden,et al. Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[97] J. Eastwood,et al. Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[98] G Chastain,et al. Attentional capture with various distractor and target types , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[99] J. Wolfe. Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[100] V Di Lollo,et al. The preattentive emperor has no clothes: a dynamic redressing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[101] R. Rosenholtz. Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[102] P. Verghese. Visual Search and Attention A Signal Detection Theory Approach , 2001, Neuron.
[103] Philip Quinlan,et al. Searching for threat , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[104] S. Hochstein,et al. View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.
[105] Jacob Feldman,et al. Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.
[106] Antonio Torralba,et al. Modeling global scene factors in attention. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[107] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Do Intersections Serve as Basic Features in Visual Search? , 2003, Perception.
[108] Lin Chen. The topological approach to perceptual organization , 2005 .