Absorptive Capacity and Social Capital in Regional Innovation Systems: The Case of the Lahti Region in Finland

The recent theories of innovation suggest that there is great potential for innovation in the structural holes and weak links of the innovation system. Higher absorptive capacity enables an easier crossing over of structural holes in the innovation system, aided by social capital that is located in the social relationships of actors. However, the level of human and social interaction in regional innovation systems has been largely neglected as a research topic. Empirical research on a sample in the Lahti region in Finland suggested three forms of social capital: organisational bonding social capital, regional bridging social capital and personal creative social capital. Further analysis revealed three groups of actors’ interaction behaviour: Missionaries, House Mice and the Passive Resistance.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Vesa Harmaakorpi,et al.  Regional Development Platform Method (RDPM) as a tool for regional innovation policy 1 , 2006 .

[3]  N. Lin.  Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[4]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[5]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  D. Foray.  Economics of knowledge , 2004 .

[7]  S. Albers,et al.  Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-Up at Hyundai Motor , 1998 .

[8]  Gilles Paquet,et al.  Local and regional systems of innovation , 1998 .

[9]  N. Lin.  Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2001 .

[10]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes Social Networks and Economic Outcomes: Core Principles , 2022 .

[13]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[14]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[15]  Helinä Melkas,et al.  A method for assessing absorptive capacity of a regional innovation system , 2006 .

[16]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[17]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Sandra Vandermerwe,et al.  Diffusing new ideas in-house , 1987 .

[19]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Research on the management of innovation : the Minnesota studies , 1991 .

[20]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  The Rise and Decline of Nations , 1983 .

[21]  F. Fukuyama.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity Penguin London , 1995 .

[22]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  D. Doloreux,et al.  What we should know about regional systems of innovation , 2002 .

[25]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[26]  Jonathan Littman,et al.  The Ten Faces of Innovation , 2005 .

[27]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Regional Economies as knowledge laboratories , 2005 .

[28]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  Cultural Conflict and Merger Failure: An Experimental Approach , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[29]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[30]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[31]  Tomi Tura,et al.  Social capital in building regional innovative capability , 2005 .

[32]  F. Tödtling,et al.  One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .

[33]  Andrew B. Hargadon.  Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[34]  R. Boschma.  Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective , 2004 .

[35]  A. L. Frohman.  Personal Initiative Sparks Innovation , 1999 .

[36]  W. C. Herbein,et al.  Front-End Innovation at AlliedSignal and Alcoa , 1999 .

[37]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[38]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[39]  Chung-Jen Chen.  The Effects of Knowledge Attribute, Alliance Characteristics, and Absorptive Capacity on Knowledge Transfer Performance , 2004 .

[40]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[41]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .