Prostate Cancer Grading: Use of Graph Cut and Spatial Arrangement of Nuclei

Tissue image grading is one of the most important steps in prostate cancer diagnosis, where the pathologist relies on the gland structure to assign a Gleason grade to the tissue image. In this grading scheme, the discrimination between grade 3 and grade 4 is the most difficult, and receives the most attention from researchers. In this study, we propose a novel method (called nuclei-based method) that 1) utilizes graph theory techniques to segment glands and 2) computes a gland-score (based on the spatial arrangement of nuclei) to estimate how similar a segmented region is to a gland. Next, we create a fusion method by combining this nuclei-based method with the lumen-based method presented in our previous work to improve the performance of grade 3 versus grade 4 classification problem (the accuracy is now improved to 87.3% compared to 81.1% of the lumen-based method alone). To segment glands, we build a graph of nuclei and lumina in the image, and use the normalized cut method to partition the graph into different components, each corresponding to a gland. Unlike most state-of-the-art lumen-based gland segmentation method, the nuclei-based method is able to segment glands without lumen or glands with multiple lumina. Moreover, another important contribution in this research is the development of a set of measures to exploit the difference in nuclei spatial arrangement between grade 3 images (where nuclei form closed chain structure on the gland boundary) and grade 4 image (where nuclei distribute more randomly in the gland). These measures are combined to generate a single gland-score value, which estimates how similar a segmented region (which is a set of nuclei and lumina) is to a gland.

[1]  Chunming Li,et al.  Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[2]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[3]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Automated Gland Segmentation and Classification for Gleason Grading of Prostate Tissue Images , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Claus Bahlmann,et al.  Computer-aided gleason grading of prostate cancer histopathological images using texton forests , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  Yen-Chih Wu,et al.  Classification of prostatic biopsy , 2010, 6th International Conference on Digital Content, Multimedia Technology and its Applications.

[8]  Charles T. Zahn,et al.  Graph-Theoretical Methods for Detecting and Describing Gestalt Clusters , 1971, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[9]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Andrew Janowczyk,et al.  High-Throughput Prostate Cancer Gland Detection, Segmentation, and Classification from Digitized Needle Core Biopsies , 2010, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[11]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[14]  Anindya Sarkar,et al.  Structure and Context in Prostatic Gland Segmentation and Classification , 2012, MICCAI.

[15]  Elizabeth Genega,et al.  Network cycle features: Application to computer-aided Gleason grading of prostate cancer histopathological images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[16]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  Oscar Déniz,et al.  A fully automated approach to prostate biopsy segmentation based on level-set and mean filtering , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[18]  Qing Yang,et al.  Iterative Voting for Inference of Structural Saliency and Characterization of Subcellular Events , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  High-throughput detection of prostate cancer in histological sections using probabilistic pairwise Markov models , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Cascaded discrimination of normal, abnormal, and confounder classes in histopathology: Gleason grading of prostate cancer , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  Yulei Jiang,et al.  Segmentation of prostatic glands in histology images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[23]  James Diamond,et al.  The use of morphological characteristics and texture analysis in the identification of tissue composition in prostatic neoplasia. , 2004, Human pathology.

[24]  Rvneet Singh,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists. , 2011, Indian journal of cancer.

[25]  J. Epstein An update of the Gleason grading system. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[26]  D. Gleason,et al.  Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. , 1992, Human pathology.

[27]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Cardinal Multiridgelet-based Prostate Cancer Histological Image Classification for Gleason Grading , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine.