Flat detectors and their clinical applications

Diagnostic and interventional flat detector X-ray systems are penetrating the market in all application segments. First introduced in radiography and mammography, they have conquered cardiac and general angiography and are getting increasing attention in fluoroscopy. Two flat detector technologies prevail. The dominating method is based on an indirect X-ray conversion process, using cesium iodide scintillators. It offers considerable advantages in radiography, angiography and fluoroscopy. The other method employs a direct converter such as selenium which is particularly suitable for mammography. Both flat detector technologies are based on amorphous silicon active pixel matrices. Flat detectors facilitate the clinical workflow in radiographic rooms, foster improved image quality and provide the potential to reduce dose. This added value is based on their large dynamic range, their high sensitivity to X-rays and the instant availability of the image. Advanced image processing is instrumental in these improvements and expand the range of conventional diagnostic methods. In angiography and fluoroscopy the transition from image intensifiers to flat detectors is facilitated by ample advantages they offer, such as distortion-free images, excellent coarse contrast, large dynamic range and high X-ray sensitivity. These characteristics and their compatibility with strong magnetic fields are the basis for improved diagnostic methods and innovative interventional applications.

[1]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Thin-film, flat-panel imagers - A coming revolution in megavoltage and diagnostic X-ray imaging? , 1993 .

[2]  Vincent Loustauneau,et al.  Ghosting comparison for large-area selenium detectors suitable for mammography and general radiography , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Mark A. Hartney,et al.  High-performance amorphous silicon image sensor for x-ray diagnostic medical imaging applications , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[4]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[5]  Douglas Albagli,et al.  Performance of a flat-panel cardiac detector , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" x-ray flat-panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for general radiography systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Jean-Pierre Moy.  Image quality of scintillator-based x-ray electronic imagers , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Mats Danielsson,et al.  Measurements on a full-field digital mammography system with a photon counting crystalline silicon detector , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Technology and Applications of Amorphous Silicon , 2000 .

[10]  Martin Choquette,et al.  Direct conversion detector for digital mammography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Zhenxue Jing,et al.  Characterization of a full-field digital mammography detector based on direct x-ray conversion in selenium , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  M. Reiser,et al.  Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[13]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics , 2000 .

[14]  Chengyu Shi.  Specifications, Performance Evaluation and Quality Assurance of Radiographic and Fluoroscopic Systems in the Digital Era , 2006 .

[15]  Isaias D. Job,et al.  40 x 30 cm flat-panel imager for angiography, R&F, and cone-beam CT applications , 2001 .

[16]  Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography , 2003, European Radiology.

[17]  U. Neitzel,et al.  Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics , 2001, European Radiology.

[18]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. , 1997, Medical physics.

[19]  Martin Choquette,et al.  Performance of a real-time selenium-based x-ray detector for fluoroscopy , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Richard Aufrichtig,et al.  DQE(f) of an amorphous-silicon flat-panel x-ray detector: detector parameter influences and measurement methodology , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[21]  K Stierstorfer,et al.  Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of x-ray detectors. , 1999, Medical physics.

[22]  R Van Metter,et al.  Objective performance characteristics of a new asymmetric screen-film system. , 1994, Medical physics.

[23]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[24]  K R Hoffman,et al.  In the next decade automated computer analysis will be an accepted sole method to separate "normal" from "abnormal" radiological images. , 1999, Medical physics.

[25]  Noriyuki Moriyama,et al.  Development and evaluation of a digital radiography system using a large-area flat-panel detector , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[26]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Direct-conversion flat-panel X-ray image sensors for digital radiography , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Physics and psychophysics , 2000 .

[29]  Satoshi Okada,et al.  Performance of a novel 43-cm x 43-cm flat-panel detector with CsI:Tl scintillator , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[30]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. , 1995, Medical physics.

[31]  Wei Zhao,et al.  The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[32]  Tomonori Gido,et al.  Improved computed radiography image quality from a BaFl:Eu photostimulable phosphor plate. , 2002, Medical physics.

[33]  Markus Völk,et al.  Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature , 2004, European Radiology.

[34]  F. Thibault,et al.  Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges , 2004, European Radiology.

[35]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[36]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  Amorphous silicon x-ray image sensor , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[37]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  Image quality of a large-area dynamic flat detector: comparison with a state-of-the-art II/TV system , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[39]  H. Blume,et al.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. , 1995, Medical physics.

[40]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Direct conversion detectors: the effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiency. , 2002, Medical physics.

[41]  Falko Busse,et al.  Design and performance of a high-quality cardiac flat detector , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[42]  M. Völk,et al.  Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies. , 1997, Investigative Radiology.

[43]  Denny L. Y. Lee,et al.  New digital detector for projection radiography , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[44]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Approaching the theoretical x-ray sensitivity with Hgl2 direct detection image sensors , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[45]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Improved imaging performance of a 14"x17" direct radiography system using a Se/TFT detector , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[46]  Matthias Simon,et al.  PbO as direct conversion x-ray detector material , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[47]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Novel, Magnetically Guided Catheter for Endocardial Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2002, Circulation.

[48]  E. Kotter,et al.  Digital radiography with large-area flat-panel detectors , 2002, European Radiology.

[49]  B Geiger,et al.  Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. , 2000, Investigative radiology.