Spin, Bias, and Clinical Utility in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Studies.

[1]  Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evaluation of "Spin" in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in High-Impact Factor Journals. , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  D. Moher,et al.  Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline. , 2019, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  David Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[4]  Wojtek Wiercioch,et al.  Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 3: a systematic review shows limitations in most tools designed to assess quality and develop recommendations. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  S. Gilbody,et al.  Are there researcher allegiance effects in diagnostic validation studies of the PHQ-9? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, BMJ Open.

[6]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of "Spin" in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. , 2016, The Milbank quarterly.

[8]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Diagnostic tests often fail to lead to changes in patient outcomes. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin". , 2013, Radiology.

[10]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. , 2010, JAMA.

[11]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Overinterpretation of clinical applicability in molecular diagnostic research. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[12]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[13]  Fujian Song,et al.  Quality of Cochrane reviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  P Middleton,et al.  Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.