Cooperate without Looking in a Non-Repeated Game

We propose a simple model for why we have more trust in people who cooperate without calculating the associated costs. Intuitively, by not looking at the payoffs, people indicate that they will not be swayed by high temptations to defect, which makes them more attractive as interaction partners. We capture this intuition using a simple four-stage game. In the first stage, nature draws the costs and benefits of cooperation according to a commonly-known distribution. In the second stage, Player 1 chooses whether or not to look at the realized payoffs. In the third stage, Player 2 decides whether to exit or let Player 1 choose whether or not to cooperate in the fourth stage. Using backward induction, we provide a complete characterization for when we expect Player 1 to cooperate without looking. Moreover, we show with numerical simulations how cooperating without looking can emerge through simple evolutionary processes.

[1]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction , 1993 .

[2]  Ananish Chaudhuri Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature , 2011 .

[3]  J. Ledyard Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[4]  Max M. Krasnow,et al.  Evolution of direct reciprocity under uncertainty can explain human generosity in one-shot encounters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  M. Nowak,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Christian Hilbe,et al.  Local Replicator Dynamics: A Simple Link Between Deterministic and Stochastic Models of Evolutionary Game Theory , 2011, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[7]  Eyal Winter,et al.  A Necessary and Sufficient Epistemic Condition for Playing Backward Induction , 1997 .

[8]  A. Houston,et al.  The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation , 2008, Nature.

[9]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Pairwise comparison and selection temperature in evolutionary game dynamics. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  The , 1966 .

[11]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Tatsuya Sasaki,et al.  The evolution of cooperation by social exclusion , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[14]  M. Rabin,et al.  Understanding Social Preference with Simple Tests , 2001 .

[15]  M. Nowak,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[16]  T. W. Ross,et al.  Cooperation without Reputation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner's Dilemma Games , 1996 .

[17]  David G. Rand,et al.  Risking Your Life without a Second Thought: Intuitive Decision-Making and Extreme Altruism , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[19]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations , 2004, Nature.

[21]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  U. Dulleck,et al.  μ-σ Games , 2012, Games.

[23]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Correction: The Structure of Mutations and the Evolution of Cooperation , 2012, PLoS ONE.

[24]  M. van vugt,et al.  Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[26]  H. Gintis,et al.  Costly signaling and cooperation. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  M. Rabin Published by: American , 2022 .

[28]  David G. Rand,et al.  Heuristics guide the implementation of social preferences in one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma experiments , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[30]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of Biological Games , 2004, Science.

[31]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[32]  Sergiu Hart,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics and backward induction , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[33]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[34]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[35]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice , 1997, cond-mat/9710096.

[36]  G. Roberts Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Ross Cressman,et al.  The Dynamic (In)Stability of Backwards Induction , 1998 .

[38]  R. Cressman Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games , 2003 .

[39]  R. Axelrod,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics , 2004 .

[40]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Indirect reciprocity with optional interactions. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  S. Heap,et al.  Repeated Games and Reputations , 1995 .

[42]  M. Nowak,et al.  Cooperate without looking: Why we care what people think and not just what they do , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.