Absolute dose calculations for Monte Carlo simulations of radiotherapy beams

Monte Carlo (MC) simulations have traditionally been used for single field relative comparisons with experimental data or commercial treatment planning systems (TPS). However, clinical treatment plans commonly involve more than one field. Since the contribution of each field must be accurately quantified, multiple field MC simulations are only possible by employing absolute dosimetry. Therefore, we have developed a rigorous calibration method that allows the incorporation of monitor units (MU) in MC simulations. This absolute dosimetry formalism can be easily implemented by any BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc user, and applies to any configuration of open and blocked fields, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Our approach involves the relationship between the dose scored in the monitor ionization chamber of a radiotherapy linear accelerator (linac), the number of initial particles incident on the target, and the field size. We found that for a 10 x 10 cm2 field of a 6 MV photon beam, 1 MU corresponds, in our model, to 8.129 x 10(13) +/- 1.0% electrons incident on the target and a total dose of 20.87 cGy +/- 1.0% in the monitor chambers of the virtual linac. We present an extensive experimental verification of our MC results for open and intensity-modulated fields, including a dynamic 7-field IMRT plan simulated on the CT data sets of a cylindrical phantom and of a Rando anthropomorphic phantom, which were validated by measurements using ionization chambers and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). Our simulation results are in excellent agreement with experiment, with percentage differences of less than 2%, in general, demonstrating the accuracy of our Monte Carlo absolute dose calculations.

[1]  K. Kase,et al.  Head scatter data for several linear accelerators (4-18 MV). , 1986, Medical physics.

[2]  J Chu,et al.  The effect of collimator backscatter radiation on photon output of linear accelerators. , 1987, Medical physics.

[3]  C Field,et al.  Backscatter into the beam monitor chamber: implications for dosimetry of asymmetric collimators. , 1993, Medical physics.

[4]  D A Jaffray,et al.  Extrafocal radiation: a unified approach to the prediction of beam penumbra and output factors for megavoltage x-ray beams. , 1995, Medical physics.

[5]  C. Ma,et al.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. , 1995, Medical physics.

[6]  R. Sloboda,et al.  Measurement of photon beam backscatter from collimators to the beam monitor chamber using target-current-pulse-counting and telescope techniques. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T R Mackie,et al.  Calculating output factors for photon beam radiotherapy using a convolution/superposition method based on a dual source photon beam model. , 1997, Medical physics.

[8]  K L Lam,et al.  Measurement of backscatter to the monitor chamber of medical accelerators using target charge. , 1998, Medical physics.

[9]  T. Mackie,et al.  Modeling photon output caused by backscattered radiation into the monitor chamber from collimator jaws using a Monte Carlo technique. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  A. Nahum,et al.  Backscatter towards the monitor ion chamber in high-energy photon and electron beams: charge integration versus Monte Carlo simulation. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  S. Cora,et al.  Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  F Verhaegen,et al.  A method of simulating dynamic multileaf collimators using Monte Carlo techniques for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  B. Faddegon,et al.  Description and dosimetric verification of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo dose calculation system for photon beams incident on a water phantom. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  C. Ma,et al.  A Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  D. G. Lewis,et al.  A DICOM-RT-based toolbox for the evaluation and verification of radiotherapy plans. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  D. Sheikh-Bagheri,et al.  Sensitivity of megavoltage photon beam Monte Carlo simulations to electron beam and other parameters. , 2002, Medical physics.

[17]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Dual-energy tissue cancellation in mammography with quasi-monochromatic x-rays. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  G. Ding.  Energy spectra, angular spread, fluence profiles and dose distributions of 6 and 18 MV photon beams: results of monte carlo simulations for a varian 2100EX accelerator. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  R. Mohan,et al.  A method for photon beam Monte Carlo multileaf collimator particle transport. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Antonio Leal,et al.  Routine IMRT verification by means of an automated Monte Carlo simulation system. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reply to `Comments on `Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams' ' , 2003 .

[22]  G. Ding.  Using Monte Carlo simulations to commission photon beam output factors--a feasibility study. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Comments on 'ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams'. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  B. Fraass,et al.  Summary and recommendations of a National Cancer Institute workshop on issues limiting the clinical use of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for megavoltage external beam radiation therapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[25]  W. Beckham,et al.  Modelling an extreme water-lung interface using a single pencil beam algorithm and the Monte Carlo method. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  E. Heath,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of the clinical implementation of the first commercial IMRT Monte Carlo treatment planning system at 6 MV. , 2004, Medical physics.

[27]  L Chen,et al.  Monitor unit calculation for Monte Carlo treatment planning , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.