Comparison of torque estimators for PMSM

One of the disadvantages of permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) is the output torque ripples which degrade the performance of the system. Actual torque feedback to the system reduces output torque ripple but increases costs through the use of a torque transducer. Thus, a torque estimator which can provide accurate instantaneous torque feedback to the system will be highly desirable. However, there is no previous work comparing the different methods in estimating torque for a PMSM. This paper will compare four torque estimators using MATLAB/Simulinktrade to test how well the estimated torques are when compared to the actual output torque. The four criteria used for comparing the performance of the torque estimators are accuracy, robustness, complexity and cost. Depending on the type of operations, the torque estimators have different performance. From the simulations, it is found that if high accuracy and robustness is needed, model reference adaptive system (MRAS) and sliding mode observation (SMO) may be the best choices. However, if low cost and low complexity is desired, general torque equation (GTE) and flux estimation with compensation scheme (FCS) should be chosen.

[1]  I. Husain,et al.  Torque ripple minimization with on-line parameter estimation using neural networks in permanent magnet synchronous motors , 1998, Conference Record of 1998 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Third IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36242).

[2]  K. W. Lim,et al.  Analysis of direct torque control in permanent magnet synchronous motor drives , 1997 .

[3]  Hoang Le-Huy Modeling and simulation of electrical drives using MATLAB/Simulink and Power System Blockset , 2001, IECON'01. 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No.37243).

[4]  土手 康彦,et al.  Brushless servomotors : fundamentals and applications , 1990 .

[5]  Sanjib Kumar Panda,et al.  Torque ripple minimization in PM synchronous motor using iterative learning control , 1999, IECON'99. Conference Proceedings. 25th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No.99CH37029).

[6]  Thomas M. Jahns,et al.  Pulsating torque minimization techniques for permanent magnet AC motor drives-a review , 1996, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[7]  M.N. Uddin,et al.  An adaptive filter based torque ripple minimization of a fuzzy logic controller for speed control of a PM synchronous motor , 2005, Fourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005..

[8]  Myung-Joong Youn,et al.  A new instantaneous torque control of PM synchronous motor for high performance direct drive applications , 1997, Proceedings of APEC 97 - Applied Power Electronics Conference.

[9]  Bimal K. Bose,et al.  Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives , 2001 .

[10]  S.K. Panda,et al.  Torque ripple minimization in PM synchronous motors using iterative learning control , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  Ya-Jun Pan,et al.  Improved PMSM pulsating torque minimization with iterative learning and sliding mode observer , 2000, 2000 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IECON 2000. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation. 21st Century Technologies.

[12]  M. F. Rahman,et al.  A Direct Torque Controlled Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive without a Speed Sensor , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.