X-RAY GROUPS OF GALAXIES IN THE AEGIS DEEP AND WIDE FIELDS

We present the results of a search for extended X-ray sources and their corresponding galaxy groups from 800 ks Chandra coverage of the All-wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS). This yields one of the largest X-ray-selected galaxy group catalogs from a blind survey to date. The red-sequence technique and spectroscopic redshifts allow us to identify 100% of reliable sources, leading to a catalog of 52 galaxy groups. These groups span the redshift range z ∼ 0.066–1.544 and virial mass range M200 ∼ 1.34 × 1013–1.33 × 1014 M☉. For the 49 extended sources that lie within DEEP2 and DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey coverage, we identify spectroscopic counterparts and determine velocity dispersions. We select member galaxies by applying different cuts along the line of sight or in projected spatial coordinates. A constant cut along the line of sight can cause a large scatter in scaling relations in low-mass or high-mass systems depending on the size of the cut. A velocity-dispersion-based virial radius can cause a larger overestimation of velocity dispersion in comparison to an X-ray-based virial radius for low-mass systems. There is no significant difference between these two radial cuts for more massive systems. Independent of radial cut, an overestimation of velocity dispersion can be created in the case of the existence of significant substructure and compactness in X-ray emission, which mostly occur in low-mass systems. We also present a comparison between X-ray galaxy groups and optical galaxy groups detected using the Voronoi–Delaunay method for DEEP2 data in this field.

[1]  Emilio Molina,et al.  Summary and Discussion , 2014 .

[2]  A. Connolly,et al.  THE DEEP2 GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY: DESIGN, OBSERVATIONS, DATA REDUCTION, AND REDSHIFTS , 2012, 1203.3192.

[3]  A. Finoguenov,et al.  EXPLORING THE DIVERSITY OF GROUPS AT 0.1 < z < 0.8 WITH X-RAY AND OPTICALLY SELECTED SAMPLES , 2012, 1208.0344.

[4]  Iap,et al.  Compact Groups of Galaxies selected by stellar mass: The 2MASS Compact Group Catalogue , 2012, 1207.2196.

[5]  B. Garilli,et al.  THE zCOSMOS 20k GROUP CATALOG , 2012, 1207.0002.

[6]  J. Newman,et al.  THE DEEP2 GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY: THE VORONOI–DELAUNAY METHOD CATALOG OF GALAXY GROUPS , 2012, 1203.3899.

[7]  W. Harris,et al.  Substructure in the Most Massive GEEC Groups: Field-like Populations in Dynamically Active Groups , 2012, 1201.3676.

[8]  C. Marmo,et al.  The WIRCam Deep Survey I. Counts, colours, and mass-functions derived from near-infrared imaging in the CFHTLS deep fields , 2011, 1111.6997.

[9]  N. Clerc,et al.  A Chandra view of the z=1.62 galaxy cluster IRC-0218A , 2011, 1109.6194.

[10]  Puragra Guhathakurta,et al.  The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the impact of environment on the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies at intermediate redshift , 2011, 1109.5698.

[11]  Alison L. Coil,et al.  THE DEEP3 GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY: KECK/DEIMOS SPECTROSCOPY IN THE GOODS-N FIELD , 2011, 1101.4018.

[12]  B. Hsieh,et al.  THE RED-SEQUENCE CLUSTER SURVEY-2 (RCS-2): SURVEY DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRIC CATALOG CONSTRUCTION , 2010, 1012.3470.

[13]  Yoshihiro Ueda,et al.  A SPECTROSCOPICALLY CONFIRMED X-RAY CLUSTER AT z = 1.62 WITH A POSSIBLE COMPANION IN THE SUBARU/XMM-NEWTON DEEP FIELD , 2010, 1004.3606.

[14]  J. Dunlop,et al.  X-ray groups and clusters of galaxies in the Subaru–XMM Deep Field , 2009, 0912.0039.

[15]  Y. Mellier,et al.  A WEAK LENSING STUDY OF X-RAY GROUPS IN THE COSMOS SURVEY: FORM AND EVOLUTION OF THE MASS–LUMINOSITY RELATION , 2009, 0910.5219.

[16]  A. Finoguenov,et al.  THE ROADMAP FOR UNIFICATION IN GALAXY GROUP SELECTION. I. A SEARCH FOR EXTENDED X-RAY EMISSION IN THE CNOC2 SURVEY , 2009, 0909.2258.

[17]  T. Jeltema,et al.  Groups of galaxies in AEGIS: the 200-ks Chandra extended X-ray source catalogue , 2009, 0907.1903.

[18]  B. Garilli,et al.  AN OPTICAL GROUP CATALOG TO z = 1 FROM THE zCOSMOS 10 k SAMPLE , 2009, 0903.3411.

[19]  A. Hornstrup,et al.  CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. II. SAMPLES AND X-RAY DATA REDUCTION , 2008, 0805.2207.

[20]  B. Weiner,et al.  AEGIS: THE CLUSTERING OF X-RAY ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS RELATIVE TO GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1 , 2009, 0902.0363.

[21]  P. A. R. Ade,et al.  GALAXY CLUSTERS DISCOVERED WITH A SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT SURVEY , 2008, 0810.1578.

[22]  R. Nichol,et al.  Modeling the color evolution of luminous red galaxies - improvements with empirical stellar spectra , 2008, 0809.1867.

[23]  A. Georgakakis,et al.  AEGIS-X: THE CHANDRA DEEP SURVEY OF THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP , 2008, 0809.1349.

[24]  R. Massey,et al.  A Subaru Weak-Lensing Survey. I. Cluster Candidates and Spectroscopic Verification , 2007, 0707.2249.

[25]  T. Ponman,et al.  Scaling relations in fossil galaxy groups , 2007, astro-ph/0702095.

[26]  E. Rozo,et al.  MaxBCG: A Red-Sequence Galaxy Cluster Finder , 2007, astro-ph/0701268.

[27]  R. Ellis,et al.  The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak lensing analyses , 2006, astro-ph/0608643.

[28]  E. L. Wright,et al.  The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets , 2006, astro-ph/0607355.

[29]  E. L. Wright,et al.  Clusters of Galaxies in the First Half of the Universe from the IRAC Shallow Survey , 2008, 0804.4798.

[30]  J. Trump,et al.  The XMM-Newton Wide-Field Survey in the COSMOS Field: Statistical Properties of Clusters of Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0612360.

[31]  R. Nichol,et al.  The XMM Cluster Survey: A Massive Galaxy Cluster at z = 1.45 , 2006, astro-ph/0606075.

[32]  M. Markevitch,et al.  Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 6/22/04 ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT OF THE UNRESOLVED COSMIC X-RAY BACKGROUND IN THE 0.5–8 KEV BAND WITH CHANDRA , 2006 .

[33]  Durham,et al.  An analytic investigation of the scatter in the integrated X-ray properties of galaxy groups and clusters , 2005, astro-ph/0511768.

[34]  R. Nichol,et al.  The C4 Clustering Algorithm: Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2005, astro-ph/0503713.

[35]  R. Carlberg,et al.  Galaxy groups at 0.3 <=z<= 0.55 - I. Group properties , 2005 .

[36]  Michael D. Gladders,et al.  The Red-Sequence Cluster Survey. I. The Survey and Cluster Catalogs for Patches RCS 0926+37 and RCS 1327+29 , 2004, astro-ph/0411075.

[37]  C. Baugh,et al.  Where are the stars , 2004, astro-ph/0412049.

[38]  UK.,et al.  The isolated elliptical NGC 4555 observed with Chandra , 2004, astro-ph/0407552.

[39]  J. J. Bock,et al.  Measurements of Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Scaling Relations for Clusters of Galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0404391.

[40]  T. Ponman,et al.  The GEMS project: X-ray analysis and statistical properties of the group sample , 2004, astro-ph/0402439.

[41]  A. Babul,et al.  The nature and space density of fossil groups of galaxies , 2003, astro-ph/0304257.

[42]  Alison L. Coil,et al.  The DEIMOS spectrograph for the Keck II Telescope: integration and testing , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[43]  T. Ponman,et al.  X-ray scaling properties of early-type galaxies , 2003, astro-ph/0301153.

[44]  Marc Davis,et al.  Science Objectives and Early Results of the DEEP2 Redshift Survey , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[45]  Amber D. Miller,et al.  Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect Imaging of MACS Galaxy Clusters at z > 0.5 , 2003 .

[46]  W. Brandt,et al.  The Chandra Deep Field North Survey. IX. Extended X-Ray Sources , 2001, astro-ph/0112002.

[47]  Roberto Gilmozzi,et al.  Chandra Deep Field South: The 1 Ms Catalog , 2002 .

[48]  M. Girardi,et al.  Evolution of the Internal Dynamics of Galaxy Clusters , 2000, astro-ph/0010302.

[49]  T. Ponman,et al.  Are X‐ray properties of loose groups different from those of compact groups? , 2000, astro-ph/0008194.

[50]  R. Giacconi,et al.  The Northern ROSAT All-Sky (NORAS) Galaxy Cluster Survey. I. X-Ray Properties of Clusters Detected as Extended X-Ray Sources , 2000, astro-ph/0003219.

[51]  D. Forbes,et al.  Multiwavelength observations of an evolved galaxy group: an end‐point of galaxy merging? , 2000 .

[52]  H. Lin,et al.  The CNOC2 field galaxy redshift survey , 1997, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[53]  B. Hoyle,et al.  Accepted for Publication in the Astrophysical Journal , 1997 .

[54]  J. Mulchaey,et al.  The Properties of Poor Groups of Galaxies. II. X-Ray and Optical Comparisons , 1997, astro-ph/9708139.

[55]  R. Carlberg,et al.  The Average Mass and Light Profiles of Galaxy Clusters , 1995, astro-ph/9512087.

[56]  G. Luppino,et al.  A possible fossil galaxy group , 1994, Nature.

[57]  T. Beers,et al.  Measures of location and scale for velocities in clusters of galaxies. A robust approach , 1990 .

[58]  S. Shectman,et al.  Evidence for substructure in rich clusters of galaxies from radial-velocity measurements , 1988 .

[59]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[60]  J. Huchra,et al.  Groups of galaxies. III. the CfA survey , 1983 .

[61]  P. Hickson Erratum - Systematic Properties of Compact Groups of Galaxies , 1982 .

[62]  J. Gott,et al.  Groups of galaxies. I. A catalogue. , 1976 .

[63]  Y. Zeldovich,et al.  Small-scale fluctuations of relic radiation , 1970, Astrophysics and Space Science.