Accurate cloud-based smart IMT measurement, its validation and stroke risk stratification in carotid ultrasound: A web-based point-of-care tool for multicenter clinical trial

This study presents AtheroCloud™ - a novel cloud-based smart carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) measurement tool using B-mode ultrasound for stroke/cardiovascular risk assessment and its stratification. This is an anytime-anywhere clinical tool for routine screening and multi-center clinical trials. In this pilot study, the physician can upload ultrasound scans in one of the following formats (DICOM, JPEG, BMP, PNG, GIF or TIFF) directly into the proprietary cloud of AtheroPoint from the local server of the physician's office. They can then run the intelligent and automated AtheroCloud™ cIMT measurements in point-of-care settings in less than five seconds per image, while saving the vascular reports in the cloud. We statistically benchmark AtheroCloud™ cIMT readings against sonographer (a registered vascular technologist) readings and manual measurements derived from the tracings of the radiologist. One hundred patients (75 M/25 F, mean age: 68±11 years), IRB approved, Toho University, Japan, consisted of Left/Right common carotid artery (CCA) artery (200 ultrasound scans), (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) were collected using a 7.5MHz transducer. The measured cIMTs for L/R carotid were as follows (in mm): (i) AtheroCloud™ (0.87±0.20, 0.77±0.20); (ii) sonographer (0.97±0.26, 0.89±0.29) and (iii) manual (0.90±0.20, 0.79±0.20), respectively. The coefficient of correlation (CC) between sonographer and manual for L/R cIMT was 0.74 (P<0.0001) and 0.65 (P<0.0001), while, between AtheroCloud™ and manual was 0.96 (P<0.0001) and 0.97 (P<0.0001), respectively. We observed that 91.15% of the population in AtheroCloud™ had a mean cIMT error less than 0.11mm compared to sonographer's 68.31%. The area under curve for receiving operating characteristics was 0.99 for AtheroCloud™ against 0.81 for sonographer. Our Framingham Risk Score stratified the population into three bins as follows: 39% in low-risk, 70.66% in medium-risk and 10.66% in high-risk bins. Statistical tests were performed to demonstrate consistency, reliability and accuracy of the results. The proposed AtheroCloud™ system is completely reliable, automated, fast (3-5 seconds depending upon the image size having an internet speed of 180Mbps), accurate, and an intelligent, web-based clinical tool for multi-center clinical trials and routine telemedicine clinical care.

[1]  M. Matsumoto,et al.  Carotid Intima-Media Thickness for Atherosclerosis. , 2016, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[2]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Automated carotid artery intima layer regional segmentation , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for a completely automated method of ultrasound measurement , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  J. Suri,et al.  Improved correlation between carotid and coronary atherosclerosis SYNTAX score using automated ultrasound carotid bulb plaque IMT measurement. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  J. Suri,et al.  Image Quality Assessment via Segmentation of Breast Lesion in X-ray and Ultrasound Phantom Images from Fischer's Full Field Digital Mammography and Ultrasound (FFDMUS) System , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[6]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Reliable and Accurate Calcium Volume Measurement in Coronary Artery Using Intravascular Ultrasound Videos , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[7]  N. Ahuja,et al.  The Smartphone in Medicine: A Review of Current and Potential Use Among Physicians and Students , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  J. Suri,et al.  Link between automated coronary calcium volumes from intravascular ultrasound to automated carotid IMT from B-mode ultrasound in coronary artery disease population. , 2014, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[9]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  CAUDLES-EF: Carotid Automated Ultrasound Double Line Extraction System Using Edge Flow , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  A state of the art review on intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[11]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Assessment of claims of improved prediction beyond the Framingham risk score. , 2009, JAMA.

[12]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Common carotid intima-media thickness in cardiovascular risk stratification of older people: the Rotterdam Study , 2012, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[13]  Nilanjan Dey,et al.  A comparative approach of four different image registration techniques for quantitative assessment of coronary artery calcium lesions using intravascular ultrasound , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[14]  U Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated carotid IMT measurement and its validation in low contrast ultrasound database of 885 patient Indian population epidemiological study: results of AtheroEdge™ Software. , 2012, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[15]  Hong-xuan Wang,et al.  Relation between Carotid Stenosis Severity, Plaque Echogenicity Characteristics and IMT Assessed by Ultrasound in the Community Population of Southern China , 2015 .

[16]  J. Suri,et al.  What is the correct distance measurement metric when measuring carotid ultrasound intima-media thickness automatically? , 2012, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[17]  Tae Jin Lee,et al.  DICOM-based intravascular ultrasound signal intensity analysis: an Echoplaque Medical Imaging Bench study , 2014, Coronary artery disease.

[18]  Jeny Rajan,et al.  Carotid inter‐adventitial diameter is more strongly related to plaque score than lumen diameter: An automated tool for stroke analysis , 2016, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[19]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Ankle–Brachial Index and Its Link to Automated Carotid Ultrasound Measurement of Intima–Media Thickness Variability in 500 Japanese Coronary Artery Disease Patients , 2014, Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

[20]  J. Zamorano,et al.  The use of pocket-size imaging devices: a position statement of the European Association of Echocardiography. , 2011, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[22]  J. Suri,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Computer‐Based Automated Tracing and Its Validation for 200 Common Carotid Arterial Wall Ultrasound Images , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[23]  D J Sheridan,et al.  The carotid intima-media thickness as a marker of the presence of severe symptomatic coronary artery disease. , 1994, European heart journal.

[24]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Automated Analysis of Intima‐Media Thickness , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Completely automated robust edge snapper for carotid ultrasound IMT measurement on a multi-institutional database of 300 images , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[26]  Elena Tremoli,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis: correlation with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary intravascular ultrasound findings. , 2007, European heart journal.

[27]  M. Altaye,et al.  Middle Cerebral Artery Peak Systolic Velocity , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[28]  J. Farmer,et al.  Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes: The Freedom Trial , 2014, Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

[29]  Diederick E Grobbee,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and coronary atherosclerosis: weak or strong relations? , 2007, European heart journal.

[30]  J. Beckman,et al.  Carotid artery disease , 2011, BMJ.

[31]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Automatic Lung Segmentation Using Control Feedback System: Morphology and Texture Paradigm , 2015, Journal of Medical Systems.

[32]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Fully Automated Dual‐Snake Formulation for Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness Measurement , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[33]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Inter- and intra-observer variability analysis of completely automated cIMT measurement software (AtheroEdge™) and its benchmarking against commercial ultrasound scanner and expert Readers , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[34]  V. Aboyans,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness as predictor of secondary events after coronary angioplasty. , 2003, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[35]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Evaluation of Carotid Wall Thickness by using Computed Tomography and Semiautomated Ultrasonographic Software , 2011 .

[36]  D. Levy,et al.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.

[37]  J. Suri,et al.  CALSFOAM-completed automated local statistics based first order absolute moment" for carotid wall recognition, segmentation and IMT measurement: validation and benchmarking on a 300 patient database. , 2011, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[38]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Inter-Greedy Technique for Fusion of Different Segmentation Strategies Leading to High-Performance Carotid IMT Measurement in Ultrasound Images , 2011, Journal of Medical Systems.

[39]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Greedy Algorithm for Error Correction in Automatically Produced Boundaries from Low Contrast Ventriculograms , 2000, Pattern Analysis & Applications.

[40]  J. Carlin,et al.  Reproducibility of aortic intima-media thickness in infants using edge-detection software and manual caliper measurements , 2014, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[41]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Atherosclerosis disease management , 2011 .

[42]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  AUTOMATIC COMPUTER-BASED TRACINGS (ACT) IN LONGITUDINAL 2-D ULTRASOUND IMAGES USING DIFFERENT SCANNERS , 2009 .

[43]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Shape‐Based Approach for Coronary Calcium Lesion Volume Measurement on Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging and Its Association With Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness , 2015, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[44]  P. Libby,et al.  Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis , 2011, Nature.

[45]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  A new method for IVUS-based coronary artery disease risk stratification: A link between coronary & carotid ultrasound plaque burdens , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[46]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  Economic impact of telemedicine: a survey. , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[47]  Nobutaka Ikeda,et al.  Impact of carotid artery ultrasound and ankle-brachial index on prediction of severity of SYNTAX score. , 2013, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[48]  S. Laxminarayan,et al.  Angiography and Plaque Imaging: Advanced Segmentation Techniques , 2007 .

[49]  Guang Zeng,et al.  Carotid artery recognition system: a comparison of three automated paradigms for ultrasound images. , 2011, Medical physics.

[50]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Hypothesis Validation of Far-Wall Brightness in Carotid-Artery Ultrasound for Feature-Based IMT Measurement Using a Combination of Level-Set Segmentation and Registration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[51]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Associations of Carotid Artery Intima‐Media Thickness (IMT) With Risk Factors and Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[52]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Comparison between manual and automated analysis for the quantification of carotid wall by using sonography. A validation study with CT. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[53]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Associations of Edge-Detected and Manual-Traced Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements With Framingham Risk Factors: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis , 2011, Stroke.

[54]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Ultrasound IMT measurement on a multi-ethnic and multi-institutional database: Our review and experience using four fully automated and one semi-automated methods , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[55]  Orrin I. Franko,et al.  Smartphone App Use Among Medical Providers in ACGME Training Programs , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[56]  J. Switzer,et al.  Telestroke 10 Years Later – ‘Telestroke 2.0’ , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[57]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Association of automated carotid IMT measurement and HbA1c in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease. , 2013, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[58]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Completely Automated Multiresolution Edge Snapper—A New Technique for an Accurate Carotid Ultrasound IMT Measurement: Clinical Validation and Benchmarking on a Multi-Institutional Database , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[59]  J. Suri,et al.  Distributed diagnosis and home healthcare (D2H2). Vol. 2 , 2011 .

[60]  B A Carroll,et al.  Physician training requirements in sonography: how many cases are needed for competence? , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[61]  L. Arroyo,et al.  Mechanisms of plaque rupture: mechanical and biologic interactions. , 1999, Cardiovascular research.

[62]  Hao Gao,et al.  Analysis of carotid artery plaque and wall boundaries on CT images by using a semi-automatic method based on level set model , 2012, Neuroradiology.

[63]  Hao Gao,et al.  Semiautomated and Automated Algorithms for Analysis of the Carotid Artery Wall on Computed Tomography and Sonography , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[64]  P Krishna Kumar,et al.  A Review on Carotid Ultrasound Atherosclerotic Tissue Characterization and Stroke Risk Stratification in Machine Learning Framework , 2015, Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

[65]  R. Ross,et al.  Cell biology of atherosclerosis. , 1995, Annual review of physiology.