Combining Traditional Marketing and Viral Marketing with Amphibious Influence Maximization

In this paper, we propose the amphibious influence maximization (AIM) model that combines traditional marketing via content providers and viral marketing to consumers in social networks in a single framework. In AIM, a set of content providers and consumers form a bipartite network while consumers also form their social network, and influence propagates from the content providers to consumers and among consumers in the social network following the independent cascade model. An advertiser needs to select a subset of seed content providers and a subset of seed consumers, such that the influence from the seed providers passing through the seed consumers could reach a large number of consumers in the social network in expectation. We prove that the AIM problem is NP-hard to approximate to within any constant factor via a reduction from Feige's k-prover proof system for 3-SAT5. We also give evidence that even when the social network graph is trivial (i.e. has no edges), a polynomial time constant factor approximation for AIM is unlikely. However, when we assume that the weighted bi-adjacency matrix that describes the influence of content providers on consumers is of constant rank, a common assumption often used in recommender systems, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm that achieves approximation ratio of (1-1/e-ε)3 for any (polynomially small) ε > 0. Our algorithmic results still hold for a more general model where cascades in social network follow a general monotone and submodular function.

[1]  Xiaokui Xiao,et al.  Influence maximization: near-optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency , 2014, SIGMOD Conference.

[2]  Lior Seeman,et al.  Approximability of Adaptive Seeding under Knapsack Constraints , 2015, EC.

[3]  Christian Borgs,et al.  Maximizing Social Influence in Nearly Optimal Time , 2012, SODA.

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  Maximizing acceptance probability for active friending in online social networks , 2013, KDD.

[5]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[6]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Locally Adaptive Optimization: Adaptive Seeding for Monotone Submodular Functions , 2016, SODA.

[7]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[8]  Sanjeev Arora,et al.  Inapproximabilty of Densest κ-Subgraph from Average Case Hardness , 2011 .

[9]  Lior Seeman,et al.  Adaptive Seeding in Social Networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[10]  Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos,et al.  Finding Dense Subgraphs via Low-Rank Bilinear Optimization , 2014, ICML.

[11]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  Submodularity in Combinatorial Optimization , 2007 .

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks , 2010, KDD.

[13]  Noga Alon,et al.  The approximate rank of a matrix and its algorithmic applications: approximate rank , 2013, STOC '13.

[14]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems , 2009, Computer.

[15]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[16]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  On the Eigenvalue Power Law , 2002, RANDOM.

[17]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Information and Influence Propagation in Social Networks , 2013, Synthesis Lectures on Data Management.

[18]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  From convex optimization to randomized mechanisms: toward optimal combinatorial auctions , 2011, STOC.

[19]  Noga Alon,et al.  The Probabilistic Method , 2015, Fundamentals of Ramsey Theory.

[20]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing , 2002, KDD.