Change in tumor size by RECIST correlates linearly with overall survival in phase I oncology studies.

PURPOSE RECIST is used to quantify tumor changes during exposure to anticancer agents. Responses are categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). Clinical trials dictate a patient's management options based on the category into which his or her response falls. However, the association between response and survival is not well studied in the early trial setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS To study the correlation between response as quantified by RECIST and overall survival (OS, the gold-standard survival outcome), we analyzed 570 participants of 24 phase I trials conducted between October 2004 and May 2009, of whom 468 had quantifiable changes in tumor size. Analyses of Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS by response and null Martingale residuals of Cox models were the primary outcome measures. All analyses are landmark analyses. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed strong associations between change in tumor size by RECIST and survival (P = 4.5 × 10(-6) to < 1 × 10(-8)). The relationship was found to be near-linear (R(2) = 0.75 to 0.92) and confirmed by the residual analyses. No clear inflection points were found to exist in the relationship between tumor size changes and survival. CONCLUSION RECIST quantification of response correlates with survival, validating RECIST's use in phase I trials. However, the lack of apparent boundary values in the relationship between change in tumor size and OS demonstrates the arbitrary nature of the CR/PR/SD/PD categories and questions emphasis placed on this categorization scheme. Describing tumor responses as a continuous variable may be more informative than reporting categoric responses when evaluating novel anticancer therapies.

[1]  D. Lane Reporting results from chemotherapy trials. , 1985, JAMA.

[2]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .

[3]  Lesley Seymour,et al.  An Overview of the Optimal Planning, Design, and Conduct of Phase I Studies of New Therapeutics , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  J. Humm,et al.  Antitumour activity of MDV3100 in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a phase 1–2 study , 2010, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Lipsett On the nature and ethics of phase I clinical trials of cancer chemotherapies. , 1982, JAMA.

[6]  M. Buyse,et al.  Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: A Practical Guide , 2006 .

[7]  S. Curley,et al.  Association of computed tomography morphologic criteria with pathologic response and survival in patients treated with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases. , 2009, JAMA.

[8]  M Paesmans,et al.  Response to chemotherapy has predictive value for further survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: 10 years experience of the European Lung Cancer Working Party. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[9]  M. Christian,et al.  Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J R Anderson,et al.  Analysis of survival by tumor response. , 1983, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Halabi,et al.  Oncology clinical trials : successful design, conduct, and analysis , 2010 .

[12]  R. John Davenport,et al.  Go or No-Go? , 2003 .

[13]  Mark J. Ratain,et al.  Measuring response in a post-RECIST world: from black and white to shades of grey , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  Seiichiro Yamamoto,et al.  Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Haesun Choi,et al.  Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  R. Gelman,et al.  Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  C. Daugherty Ethical Issues in the Development of New Agents , 2004, Investigational New Drugs.

[18]  S. Prasad,et al.  Tumor Response Evaluation in Oncology: Current Update , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Reporting results from chemotherapy trials. Does response make a difference in patient survival? , 1984, JAMA.

[20]  C. Blandizzi,et al.  Healthy volunteers and early phases of clinical experimentation , 2010, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[21]  Mark Yoffe,et al.  Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  A. Harris,et al.  Anticancer agents targeting signaling molecules and cancer cell environment: challenges for drug development? , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  T M Therneau,et al.  Diagnostic plots to reveal functional form for covariates in multiplicative intensity models. , 1995, Biometrics.

[24]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[25]  J. Llinares A regulatory overview about rare diseases. , 2010, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[26]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  Raoul Tibes,et al.  Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Haesun Choi,et al.  We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Analysis of survival by tumor response and other comparisons of time-to-event by outcome variables. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  R. Pazdur Response rates, survival, and chemotherapy trials. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  T. Fojo,et al.  Progression-Free Survival Is Simply a Measure of a Drug’s Effect While Administered and Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival , 2009, Cancer journal.

[33]  Thomas J Lynch,et al.  The phase III trial in the era of targeted therapy: unraveling the "go or no go" decision. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.