Rhetorics and Realities in Public Service Organizations: Systemic Practice and Organizational Learning as Critically Reflexive Action Research (CRAR)

This article sets out to develop an argument and theory-in-practice related to organizational learning and systemic practice as critically reflexive action research (CRAR). It explores principles and concepts associated with CRAR, in the context of different emphases in understandings of and approaches to “managing” or “working with” change. The notion of “epistemologies of practice” is developed, as the basis for introducing “on-site” and “off-site” CRAR as interweaving cycles of managerial and organizational learning. A multilayered illustration of an improvisational CRAR environment, using principles of dialectical enquiry and critical learning theater, is offered. A diagrammatic analysis provides the framework for describing and reflecting critically on key CRAR processes. This is expanded with a consideration of possibilities for documentation that can assist with the validation of quality in CRAR processes and outcomes. This has relevance in the context of postpositivist action research at postgraduate levels or within project-based CRAR partnerships. This leads to a further discussion of principles and concepts, in the context of other literature and pressures on public services.

[1]  Michael Schratz,et al.  Research as Social Change: New Opportunities for Qualitative Research , 1995 .

[2]  Art Kleiner,et al.  The age of heretics : heroes, outlaws, and the forerunners of corporate change , 1996 .

[3]  Ann Taket,et al.  Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  J. Burgoyne,et al.  The Learning Company , 1989 .

[5]  O. Zuber-Skerritt New Directions in Action Research , 1996 .

[6]  Geoffrey M. Maruyama Application and transformation of action research in educational research and practice , 1996 .

[7]  W. Hutton The State We're In , 1995 .

[8]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[9]  Max Elden,et al.  Features of Emerging Action Research , 1993 .

[10]  Jacky Lumby,et al.  The Learning Organisation , 1997 .

[11]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[12]  Donald A. Schön Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology , 1995 .

[13]  Y. Lincoln Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research , 1995 .

[14]  S. Weil From the other side of silence: new possibilities for dialogue in academic writing , 1996 .

[15]  S. Weil SOCIAL AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING AND UNLEARNING IN A DIFFERENT KEY An Introduction to the Principles of Critical Learning Theatre and Dialectical Inquiry , 1997 .

[16]  R. Stacey Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[17]  G. Bateson,et al.  Mind and Nature , 1980 .

[18]  K. Weick Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[19]  Arie P. de Geus,et al.  The Living Company , 1997 .

[20]  Derek Layder,et al.  Modern Social Theory: Key Debates And New Directions , 1997 .

[21]  A. Giddens NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[22]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking , 1992 .

[23]  M. Volman,et al.  Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern , 1994 .

[24]  Roy Madron PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT IN PUBLIC SERVICES , 1995 .

[25]  Maggi Savin-Baden Problem-based learning : a catalyst for enabling and disabling disjunction prompting transitions in learner stances , 1996 .