Financial valuation of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits

Financial valuation OF GMWBs: We develop a variety of methods for assessing the cost and value of a very popular ‘rider’ available to North American investors on variable annuity (VA) policies called a Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit (GMWB). The GMWB promises to return the entire initial investment, albeit spread over an extended period of time, regardless of subsequent market performance. First, we take a static approach that assumes individuals behave passively and holds the product to maturity. We show how the product can be decomposed into a Quanto Asian Put plus a generic term-certain annuity. At the other extreme of consumer behavior, the dynamic approach leads to an optimal stopping problem akin to pricing an American put option, albeit complicated by the non-traditional payment structure. Our main result is that the No Arbitrage hedging cost of a GMWB ranges from 73 to 160 basis points of assets. In contrast, most products in the market only charge 30–45 basis points. Although we suggest a number of behavioral reasons for the apparent under-pricing of this feature in a typically overpriced VA market, we conclude by arguing that current pricing is not sustainable and that GMWB fees will eventually have to increase or product design will have to change in order to avoid blatant arbitrage opportunities.

[1]  S. Posner,et al.  Asian Options, The Sum Of Lognormals, And The Reciprocal Gamma Distribution , 1998 .

[2]  M. Sherris The Valuation of Option Features in Retirement Benefits , 1995 .

[3]  Valuation of the Minimum Guaranteed Return Embedded in Life Insurance Products , 1997 .

[4]  Phelim P. Boyle,et al.  Derivatives : The Tools That Changed Finance , 2001 .

[5]  Samuel H. Cox,et al.  Valuation of structured risk management products , 2004 .

[6]  Ruined Moments in Your Life: How Good are the Approximations? , 2004 .

[7]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  The pricing of equity-linked life insurance policies with an asset value guarantee , 1976 .

[8]  Ioannis Karatzas,et al.  Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus , 1987 .

[9]  Mary R. Hardy,et al.  Investment guarantees : modeling and risk management for equity-linked life insurance , 2003 .

[10]  R. Thaler,et al.  Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans , 2001 .

[11]  S. Turnbull,et al.  A Quick Algorithm for Pricing European Average Options , 1991, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[12]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  P. Forsyth,et al.  Valuation of segregated funds: shout options with maturity extensions , 2001 .

[14]  P. Carr Randomization and the American Put , 1996 .

[15]  K. Sandmann,et al.  Pricing Bounds on Asian Options , 2003, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[16]  S. Posner,et al.  The Titanic Option: Valuation of the Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit in Variable Annuities and Mutual Funds , 2001 .

[17]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Applications , 2002 .

[18]  M. Dempster,et al.  Pricing American Stock Options by Linear Programming , 1996 .

[19]  J. Poterba,et al.  Household Demand for Variable Annuities , 2004 .

[20]  Hans U. Gerber A.S.A.,et al.  Pricing Perpetual Fund Protection with Withdrawal Option , 2003 .

[21]  George G. Pennacchi The Value of Guarantees on Pension Fund Returns , 1999 .

[22]  Phelim P. Boyle,et al.  Equilibrium Prices of Guarantees Under Equity-Linked Contracts , 1977 .

[23]  D. Madan,et al.  Average Rate Claims with Emphasis on Catastrophe Loss Options , 2002, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.