Systematic evaluation of personal genome services for Japanese individuals

Disease risk prediction (DRP) is one of the most important challenges in personal genome research. Although many direct-to-consumer genetic test (DTC) companies have begun to offer personal genome services for DRP, there is still no consensus on what constitutes a gold-standard service. Here, we systematically evaluated the distributions of DRPs from three DTC companies, that is, 23andMe, Navigenics and deCODEme, for 22 diseases using three Japanese samples. We systematically quantified and analyzed the differences between each DTC company’s DRPs. Our independency test showed that the overall prediction results were correlated with each other, but not perfectly matched; less than onethird mismatching of the opposite direction occurred in eight diseases. Moreover, we found that the differences could mainly be attributed to four factors: (1) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) selection, (2) average risk estimation, (3) the disease risk calculation algorithm and (4) ethnicity adjustment. In particular, only 7.1% of SNPs over 22 diseases were reviewed by all three companies. Therefore, development of a universal core SNPs list for non-Caucasian samples will be important for achieving better prediction capacity for Japanese samples. This systematic methodology provides useful insights for improving the capacity of DRPs in future personal genome services.

[1]  Gholson J Lyon,et al.  Personalized medicine: Bring clinical standards to human-genetics research , 2012, Nature.

[2]  J. Chan,et al.  Construction of a prediction model for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Japanese population based on 11 genes with strong evidence of the association , 2009, Journal of Human Genetics.

[3]  E. Topol Comment on “The Predictive Capacity of Personal Genome Sequencing” , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  Alexander A. Morgan,et al.  Type 2 Diabetes Risk Alleles Demonstrate Extreme Directional Differentiation among Human Populations, Compared to Other Diseases , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[5]  N. Schork,et al.  Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Alexander A. Morgan,et al.  Likelihood ratios for genome medicine , 2010, Genome Medicine.

[7]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Multigenic condition risk assessment in direct-to-consumer genomic services , 2010, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  Alexander A. Morgan,et al.  Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome , 2010, The Lancet.

[9]  Yusuke Nakamura,et al.  Genome-wide association study of hematological and biochemical traits in a Japanese population , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[10]  J. Gulcher,et al.  A variant in CDKAL1 influences insulin response and risk of type 2 diabetes , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[11]  D. Altshuler,et al.  Updated Genetic Score Based on 34 Confirmed Type 2 Diabetes Loci Is Associated With Diabetes Incidence and Regression to Normoglycemia in the Diabetes Prevention Program , 2011, Diabetes.

[12]  Barbara Zehnbauer,et al.  Direct-to-consumer genetics testing--fair comparisons? , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  The Predictive Capacity of Personal Genome Sequencing , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  Pauline C Ng,et al.  An agenda for personalized medicine. , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Omar E. Cornejo,et al.  Phased Whole-Genome Genetic Risk in a Family Quartet Using a Major Allele Reference Sequence , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[16]  Larry J Kricka,et al.  Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.