Algorithms for fast concurrent reconfiguration of hexagonal metamorphic robots

The problem addressed is the distributed reconfiguration of a system of hexagonal metamorphic robots (modules) from an initial straight chain to a goal configuration that satisfies a simple admissibility condition. Our reconfiguration strategy depends on finding a contiguous path of cells that spans the goal configuration and over which modules can move concurrently without collision or deadlock, called an admissible substrate path. A subset of modules first occupy the admissible substrate path, which is then traversed by other modules to fill in the remainder of the goal. We present a two-phase reconfiguration strategy, beginning with a centralized preprocessing phase that finds and heuristically ranks all admissible substrate paths in the goal configuration, according to which path is likely to result in fast parallel reconfiguration. We prove the correctness of our path-finding algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness through simulation. The second phase of reconfiguration is accomplished by a deterministic, distributed algorithm that uses little or no intermodule message passing.

[1]  Zack J. Butler,et al.  Distributed motion planning for modular robots with unit-compressible modules , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[2]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  A distributed reconfiguration method for 3D homogeneous structure , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[3]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Useful metrics for modular robot motion planning , 1997, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  H. Kurokawa,et al.  Self-assembling machine , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Hajime Asama,et al.  Self-organizing collective robots with morphogenesis in a vertical plane , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[6]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Kinematics of a metamorphic robotic system , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Leonidas J. Guibas.  Controlled Module Density Helps Reconfiguration Planning , 2000 .

[8]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  A hierarchical motion planning strategy for a uniform self-reconfigurable modular robotic system , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[9]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  A complete, local and parallel reconfiguration algorithm for cube style modular robots , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[10]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Evaluating efficiency of self-reconfiguration in a class of modular robots , 1996, J. Field Robotics.

[11]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Distributed Control for 3D Metamorphosis , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[12]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Bounds for self-reconfiguration of metamorphic robots , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Arancha Casal,et al.  Self-reconfiguration planning for a class of modular robots , 1999, Optics East.

[14]  Masafumi Yamashita,et al.  High speed formations of reconfigurable modular robotic systems , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[15]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Distributed reconfiguration of metamorphic robot chains , 2004, PODC '00.

[16]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Emergent structures in modular self-reconfigurable robots , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[17]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  M-TRAN: self-reconfigurable modular robotic system , 2002 .

[18]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Modular Robot Motion Planning Using Similarity Metrics , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[19]  Mark H. Yim,et al.  Rhombic dodecahedron shape for self-assembling robots , 1997 .

[20]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Cellular robotic system (CEBOT) as one of the realization of self-organizing intelligent universal manipulator , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  Marsette Vona,et al.  Crystalline Robots: Self-Reconfiguration with Compressible Unit Modules , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[22]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Concurrent metamorphosis of hexagonal robot chains into simple connected configurations , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[23]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  Distributed formation control for a modular mechanical system , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.