How Can We Tell When a Heuristic Has Been Used? Design and Analysis Strategies for Capturing the Operation of Heuristics

Communication research based on social cognition draws heavily from dual process models such as the heuristic-systematic model. Both heuristic and systematic processing are said to be aided by quick rules of thumb or mental shortcuts called heuristics. However, the operationalization of heuristics is quite problematic because their use in decision-making is not directly measured. Scholars claim the operation of specific heuristics in specific situations, based often on clever experimental evidence. We propose a methodological framework that calls for both manipulation and measurement of heuristics in order to offer more direct evidence of their operation. We first review different existing approaches in the literature for operationalizing heuristics. We then discuss our approach and describe the application of moderated mediation to analyze the resulting data. We conclude with a study idea and simulated data that illustrate how our proposed design and analysis framework could be applied in communication research.

[1]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the orienting value of attitudes: attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  S. Sundar.  The MAIN Model : A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility , 2007 .

[3]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[4]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Persuasion by a Single Route: A View From the Unimodel , 1999 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[6]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Social Cognition Permeates Social Psychology: Motivated Mental Processes Guide the Study of Human Social Behavior , 1999 .

[7]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[9]  James M. Olson,et al.  Attitude Importance as a Function of Repeated Attitude Expression , 1994 .

[10]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Exemplification Theory of Media Influence , 2002 .

[11]  H. Erb,et al.  Persuasion According to the Unimodel: Implications for Cancer Communication , 2006 .

[12]  Shelley E. Taylor.  Judgment under uncertainty: The availability bias in social perception and interaction , 1982 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgments of and by Representativeness , 1981 .

[14]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[15]  Rick W. Busselle,et al.  Media Exposure and Exemplar Accessibility , 2003 .

[16]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Using interface cues in online health community boards to change impressions and encourage user contribution , 2011, CHI.

[17]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[18]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Feelings-as-Information Theory , 2010 .

[19]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Psychological Processes Underlying Cultivation Effects Further Tests of Construct Accessibility , 1996 .

[20]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[21]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases , 2013 .

[22]  David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Attitude Accessibility: Theory, Methods, and Future Directions , 2009 .

[23]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Authority vs. peer: how interface cues influence users , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[25]  David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  The Influence of Accessibility of Source Likability on Persuasion , 2002 .

[26]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study , 2001, CHI.

[27]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online , 2010 .

[28]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Assessing the Social Influence of Television , 1995 .

[29]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The Effects of Television Consumption on Social Perceptions: The Use of Priming Procedures to Investigate Psychological Processes , 1998 .

[30]  S. Chaiken.  The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[31]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[32]  N. Schwarz.  Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[33]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[34]  L. Gross,et al.  Living with television: the violence profile. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[35]  J. Morton,et al.  Simba's Revolution: Revisiting History and Class in The Lion King , 1996 .

[36]  Ellen Peters,et al.  A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[37]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology , 2011 .

[38]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[39]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[40]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[41]  L. Shrum.  Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect , 2001 .

[42]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[43]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[44]  Rick W. Busselle.  Television Exposure, Perceived Realism, and Exemplar Accessibility in the Social Judgment Process , 2001 .

[45]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[46]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Media Consumption and Perceptions of Social Reality: Effects and Underlying Processes , 2002 .

[47]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  Revealing the Black Box: Information Processing and Media Effects , 1993 .

[48]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[49]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Impact of Attitude Accessibility on Elaboration of Persuasive Messages , 1998 .

[50]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[51]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[52]  J. Edwards,et al.  Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[53]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context , 1989 .

[54]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[55]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Processes and Effects in the Construction of Social Reality , 1993 .

[56]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude Importance and Attitude Accessibility , 1989 .