Journal evaluation by environmental and resource economists: A survey

Using an online survey, we have asked the researchers in the field of environmental and resource economics how they themselves would rank a representative list of journals in their field. The results of this ranking are then compared to the ordering based on the journals’ impact factors as published by Thomson Scientific. The two sets of rankings seem to be positively correlated, but statistically the null hypothesis that the two rankings are uncorrelated cannot be rejected. This observation suggests that researchers interpret the current quality of journals based on other factors in addition to the impact factors.

[1]  T. Franck,et al.  Handleiding voor een economische evaluatie van het milieubeleid. Toepassing op het Vlaamse bosbeleid , 2007 .

[2]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Emerald Article : Diffusion factors , 2022 .

[3]  Sandra Rousseau,et al.  Economic Empirical Analysis of Sanctions for Environmental Violations: a Literature Overview , 2007 .

[4]  Kostas Axarloglou,et al.  Diversity in Economics: An Analysis of Journal Quality Perceptions , 2003 .

[5]  D. Laband,et al.  The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990 , 1994 .

[6]  H. Moed Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) , 2005 .

[7]  Gaines H. Liner Core Journals in Economics , 2002 .

[8]  Stef Proost,et al.  The Interaction between Tolls and Capacity Investment in Serial and Parallel Transport Networks , 2006 .

[9]  Joanne Locke,et al.  Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics , 2005 .

[10]  Concepción S. Wilson,et al.  Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: A structural equation modelling analysis , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11]  W. J. Moore,et al.  THE RELATIVE QUALITY OF ECONOMICS JOURNALS: A SUGGESTED RATING SYSTEM , 1972 .

[12]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Evaluating Environmental and Resource Economics Journals: A TOP-Curve Approach , 2009, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[13]  HUBrussel,et al.  The Impact of Sanctions and Inspections on Firms ’ Environmental Compliance Decisions , 2008 .

[14]  Yolanda K. Kodrzycki,et al.  New Approaches to Ranking Economics Journals , 2006 .

[15]  S. Liebowitz,et al.  Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economic Journals , 1984 .

[16]  B. Field Environmental Economics: An Introduction , 1979 .

[17]  C Levenstein,et al.  Environmental Economics , 2019 .

[18]  Bert Saveyn,et al.  Are NIMBY's commuters? , 2006 .

[19]  M. Jones,et al.  UK Accountants' Perceptions of Research Journal Quality , 1996 .

[20]  Stef Proost,et al.  Trip Chaining: Who Wins Who Loses? , 2006 .

[21]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[22]  Philip H. Ramsey Critical Values for Spearman’s Rank Order Correlation , 1989 .

[23]  Sandra Rousseau,et al.  Catching or Fining Speeders: A Political Economy Approach , 2007 .

[24]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  Environmental Economics and Management: Theory, Policy, and Applications , 1995 .

[25]  R. G. Hawkins,et al.  What Economists Think of Their Journals , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Leo Egghe,et al.  TOP-curves: Research Articles , 2007 .

[27]  M. Common,et al.  Natural resource and environmental economics , 1996 .

[28]  Eugene Garfield Evaluating Journals in Environmental Economics : A TOP-Curve Approach , 2008 .

[29]  Leo Egghe,et al.  TOP-curves , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Bert Saveyn,et al.  Environmental Policy in a Federal State A Regional CGE Analysis of the NEC Directive in Belgium , 2007 .

[31]  D. Laband,et al.  Revealed preference for economics journals: Citations as dollar votes , 1985 .

[32]  Sandra Rousseau,et al.  Auctioning Conservation Contracts: An Application to the Flemish Afforestation Policy , 2006 .