Female foraging strategy co-evolves with sexual harassment intensity in the Trinidadian guppy

Sexual harassment is a widespread evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict over mating rates. Male harassment can impose costs on females, and females often change their behaviors to avoid unwanted attention. In Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), males use either sneak mating behavior or courtship displays as reproductive tactics. Both behaviors can be sources of sexual harassment, but sneak behavior is likely more harmful. Males adapted to low-predation habitats use more courtship and fewer sneak tactics than their high-predation ancestors. Here, we tested whether female foraging strategy co-evolves with less severe male harassment as guppies colonize low-predation environments. We set up outdoor stream mesocosms with common-garden-reared males and females from either a high- or a low-predation population in a 2 × 2 design, and tested whether populations diverge in female response to male harassment. We found that both sneak behavior and courtship display reduced female foraging, but the effect of sneak behavior was more extensive. Furthermore, the negative effect of sneak behavior was more pronounced on high-predation females. Our results suggest that female foraging strategy coevolved with divergence in male mating strategy: females under more severe sexual harassment evolved a foraging strategy that is more sensitive to varying harassment levels.

[1]  M. Jennions,et al.  Disentangling the effects of male age and mating history: Contrasting effects of mating history on precopulatory mating behavior and paternity success , 2021, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  D. Croft,et al.  Sensory-based quantification of male colour patterns in Trinidadian guppies reveals no support for parallel phenotypic evolution in multivariate trait space. , 2021, Molecular ecology.

[3]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Characterization of Female Reproductive Proteases in a Butterfly from Functional and Evolutionary Perspectives , 2019, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[4]  J. Perry,et al.  Sexual conflict in its ecological setting , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  C. Ghalambor,et al.  Plasticity and evolution in correlated suites of traits , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[6]  A. Wong,et al.  Sexual conflict and seminal fluid proteins: a dynamic landscape of sexual interactions. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[7]  D. Reznick,et al.  Population genomics of natural and experimental populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[8]  R. Wrangham,et al.  Male chimpanzees compromise the foraging success of their mates in Kibale National Park, Uganda , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  J. Shultz,et al.  Comparative Analyses of Reproductive Structures in Harvestmen (Opiliones) Reveal Multiple Transitions from Courtship to Precopulatory Antagonism , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Steven F Railsback,et al.  Trait-mediated trophic interactions: is foraging theory keeping up? , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Year-round sexual harassment as a behavioral mediator of vertebrate population dynamics , 2012 .

[12]  D. Croft,et al.  Social preferences based on sexual attractiveness: a female strategy to reduce male sexual attention , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Pilastro,et al.  CROSS‐GENERATIONAL EFFECTS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT ON FEMALE FITNESS IN THE GUPPY , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  I. Schlupp,et al.  Costly interactions between the sexes: combined effects of male sexual harassment and female choice? , 2011 .

[15]  C. J. Clark,et al.  Explosive eversion and functional morphology of the duck penis supports sexual conflict in waterfowl genitalia , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Michael C. Marshall,et al.  Local adaptation in Trinidadian guppies alters ecosystem processes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  B. Neff,et al.  Microsatellite genetic differentiation among populations of the Trinidadian guppy , 2009, Heredity.

[18]  D. Croft,et al.  Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes , 2008, Biology Letters.

[19]  H. Kokko,et al.  Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[20]  Daniel I. Rubenstein,et al.  Male harassment influences female movements and associations in Grevy's zebra (Equus grevyi) , 2007 .

[21]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Taylor,et al.  PARALLEL EVOLUTION AND VICARIANCE IN THE GUPPY (POECILIA RETICULATA) OVER MULTIPLE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  C. Ioannou,et al.  Predation Risk as a Driving Force for Sexual Segregation: A Cross‐Population Comparison , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[24]  R. Brooks,et al.  Sexual coercion and the opportunity for sexual selection in guppies , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  G. Parker Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  R. Brooks,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE, AGE, AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ON MALE ORNAMENTATION, MATING BEHAVIOR, AND ATTRACTIVENESS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.

[28]  W. Eberhard RAPID DIVERGENT EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL MORPHOLOGY: COMPARATIVE TESTS OF ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION AND TRADITIONAL FEMALE CHOICE , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  T. Chapman,et al.  FEMALE RESISTANCE TO MALE HARM EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO MANIPULATION OF SEXUAL CONFLICT , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  J. Godin,et al.  Predator preference for brightly colored males in the guppy: a viability cost for a sexually selected trait , 2003 .

[31]  M. Vanni Nutrient Cycling by Animals in Freshwater Ecosystems , 2002 .

[32]  L. Rowe,et al.  SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION IN A MATING SYSTEM: COMBINING EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO ADDRESS EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  D. Kemp,et al.  Can older males deliver the good genes? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  D. Reznick,et al.  Life‐History Evolution in Guppies. VII. The Comparative Ecology of High‐ and Low‐Predation Environments , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[35]  L. Dill,et al.  Male mating strategies under predation risk: do females call the shots? , 1999 .

[36]  F. H. Rodd,et al.  LIFE‐HISTORY EVOLUTION IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA) 6. DIFFERENTIAL MORTALITY AS A MECHANISM FOR NATURAL SELECTION , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  J. Godin,et al.  Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  G. Stone Female foraging responses to sexual harassment in the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  L. Dill,et al.  Predation on females or males: who pays for bright male traits? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  A. Magurran,et al.  A cost of sexual harassment in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  A. Magurran,et al.  Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  D. Reznick,et al.  The Influence of Fluctuating Resources on Life History: Patterns of Allocation and Plasticity in Female Guppies , 1993 .

[43]  L. Rowe Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  John A. Endler,et al.  Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population , 1990, Nature.

[45]  David N. Reznick,et al.  The Structure of Guppy Life Histories: The Tradeoff between Growth and Reproduction , 1983 .

[46]  J. Endler NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  F. Hester Effects of Food Supply on Fecundity in the Female Guppy, Lebistes reticulatus (Peters) , 1964 .

[48]  Matthew J. Davis Contrast Coding in Multiple Regression Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Utility of Popular Coding Structures , 2021, Journal of Data Science.

[49]  U. Candolin Sexual Selection and Sexual Conflict , 2019, Encyclopedia of Ecology.

[50]  Theresa A. Kirchner,et al.  Evasive behaviours of female dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) during exploitative scramble competition , 2015 .

[51]  A. Magurran,et al.  Male harassment reduces short-term female fitness in guppies , 2007 .

[52]  A. Magurran Sexual conflict and evolution in Trinidadian guppies , 2004, Genetica.

[53]  A. Magurran,et al.  Risk Sensitive Courtship in the Guppy (Poecilia Reticulata) , 1990 .

[54]  N. Liley,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR OF THE GUPPY, POECILIA RETICULATA (PETERS) , 1985 .

[55]  J. Endler A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns , 1978 .

[56]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[57]  N. Liley Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes , 1966 .

[58]  A. Bateman,et al.  Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila , 1948, Heredity.