Predictors of Staying at Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Social Lockdown based on Protection Motivation Theory: A Cross-Sectional Study in Japan

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a social lockdown should be put in place and individuals should stay at home. Behavioral change is the only way to prevent the pandemic and overwhelmed healthcare systems until vaccines are available. We aimed to examine the psychological factors that predict staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic and social lockdown. A total of 1980 participants in Japan completed a survey for this study from 9 to 11 May 2020, when the state of emergency covered all prefectures in the country. Self-reported behavior in terms of staying at home, the perceived severity of the pandemic, vulnerability to the pandemic, response efficacy, and self-efficacy based on protection motivation theory were assessed. Multiple regression analysis showed that perceived severity (standardized β = 0.11, p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (standardized β = 0.32, p < 0.001) significantly predicted greater levels of staying at home, after controlling for socio-demographics. However, perceived vulnerability and response efficacy did not. To encourage people to stay at home during the pandemic and social lockdown, increasing the perceived severity of infection by COVID-19 and self-efficacy in terms of exercising restraint with respect to going out may consequently encourage people to stay at home.

[1]  T. Okuhara,et al.  Examining persuasive message type to encourage staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic and social lockdown: A randomized controlled study in Japan , 2020, Patient Education and Counseling.

[2]  Joshua Chiroma Gandi,et al.  COVID-19 Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Precautionary Behavior Among Nigerians: A Moderated Mediation Approach , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[3]  B. Paital,et al.  Inter nation social lockdown versus medical care against COVID-19, a mild environmental insight with special reference to India , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[4]  A. Finset,et al.  Effective health communication – a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Patient Education and Counseling.

[5]  Samuli Laato,et al.  Impact of Online Information on Self-Isolation Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Anne-Lise Sibony,et al.  The UK COVID-19 Response: A Behavioural Irony? , 2020, European Journal of Risk Regulation.

[7]  Shunqing Xu,et al.  Beware of the second wave of COVID-19 , 2020, The Lancet.

[8]  Ciarán Lavin,et al.  Using Behavioral Science to help fight the Coronavirus , 2020 .

[9]  Gareth Iacobucci Covid-19: UK lockdown is “crucial” to saving lives, say doctors and scientists , 2020, BMJ.

[10]  Agata Mikolajczyk,et al.  The positive impact of lockdown in Wuhan on containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China , 2020, Journal of travel medicine.

[11]  Evan K. Perrault,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Source Credibility and Message Framing on STI Screening Intentions: An Application of Prospect and Protection Motivation Theory , 2019, Journal of health communication.

[12]  Tobias Reynolds-Tylus Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Review of the Literature , 2019, Front. Commun..

[13]  Richard Fielding,et al.  Avian influenza A/H7N9 risk perception, information trust and adoption of protective behaviours among poultry farmers in Jiangsu Province, China , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[14]  Glenn Leshner,et al.  The Role of Narrative and Other-Referencing in Attenuating Psychological Reactance to Diabetes Self-Care Messages , 2016, Health communication.

[15]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Influences of Self-Efficacy, Response Efficacy, and Reactance on Responses to Cigarette Health Warnings: A Longitudinal Study of Adult Smokers in Australia and Canada , 2016, Health communication.

[16]  Lijiang Shen Antecedents to Psychological Reactance: The Impact of Threat, Message Frame, and Choice , 2015, Health communication.

[17]  K. Almutairi,et al.  Awareness, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Coronavirus Pandemic Among Public in Saudi Arabia , 2015, Family & community health.

[18]  Brent McFerran Social Norms, Beliefs, and Health , 2015 .

[19]  Kasisomayajula Viswanath,et al.  What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pandemic: a systematic review of the literature , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[20]  D. D. de Ridder,et al.  How norms work: self-identification, attitude, and self-efficacy mediate the relation between descriptive social norms and vegetable intake. , 2014, Applied psychology. Health and well-being.

[21]  Örjan Dahlström,et al.  Intentions to Perform Non-Pharmaceutical Protective Behaviors during Influenza Outbreaks in Sweden: A Cross-Sectional Study following a Mass Vaccination Campaign , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Ashley Shelby,et al.  Story and science , 2013, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[23]  B. Renner,et al.  Predicting vaccination using numerical and affective risk perceptions: the case of A/H1N1 influenza. , 2012, Vaccine.

[24]  Motohiko Miyachi,et al.  Measures of physical activity and exercise for health promotion by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare , 2012 .

[25]  S. Hopfer Effects of a Narrative HPV Vaccination Intervention Aimed at Reaching College Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, Prevention Science.

[26]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  The importance of coping appraisal in behavioural responses to pandemic flu. , 2012, British journal of health psychology.

[27]  S. Michie,et al.  Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: a systematic review. , 2011, Vaccine.

[28]  B. Renner,et al.  Who Takes Precautionary Action in the Face of the New H1N1 Influenza? Prediction of Who Collects a Free Hand Sanitizer Using a Health Behavior Model , 2011, PloS one.

[29]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveys , 2011, BMC public health.

[30]  S. Michie,et al.  Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review , 2010, British journal of health psychology.

[31]  J. Leask,et al.  Media coverage of health issues and how to work more effectively with journalists: a qualitative study , 2010, BMC public health.

[32]  J. Jones,et al.  Early Assessment of Anxiety and Behavioral Response to Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A(H1N1) , 2009, PloS one.

[33]  G. Rubin,et al.  Health Protection Agency, , 2011 .

[34]  Chad R. Mortensen,et al.  Fear and Loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, Emotion, and Persuasion , 2009, JMR, Journal of marketing research.

[35]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  Age- and experience-related user behavior differences in the use of complicated electronic devices , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Using Narrative Communication as a Tool for Health Behavior Change: A Conceptual, Theoretical, and Empirical Overview , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[37]  J. Shah The Automatic Pursuit and Management of Goals , 2005 .

[38]  P. Gustafson Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change , 1983 .

[40]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[41]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion , 2010 .

[42]  J. Samet,et al.  Food and Drug Administration , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  E. Seydel,et al.  Protection Motivation Theory , 2022 .