Body mass constraints on feeding rates determine the consequences of predator loss.

Understanding effects of species loss in complex food webs with multiple trophic levels is complicated by the idiosyncrasy of the predator effects on lower trophic levels: direct and indirect effects intermingle and may increase, decrease or not affect ecosystem functioning. We introduce a reductionist approach explaining a predator's trophic effect only by empirically well-founded body-mass constraints on abundance, diet breadth and feeding strength. We demonstrate that this mechanistic concept successfully explains the positive, negative and neutral net effects of predators on decomposers in a litter microcosm experiment. This approach offers a new perspective on the interplay of complex interactions within food webs and is easily extendable to include phylogenetic and other body-mass independent traits. We anticipate that allometry will substantially improve our understanding of idiosyncratic predator effects in experiments and the consequences of predator loss in natural ecosystems.

[1]  Jens O. Riede,et al.  Body sizes, cumulative and allometric degree distributions across natural food webs , 2011 .

[2]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Taxonomic versus allometric constraints on non‐linear interaction strengths , 2011 .

[3]  S. Ernest,et al.  Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  U. Brose,et al.  Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[5]  D. Wise,et al.  Terrestrial Trophic Cascades: How Much Do They Trickle? , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Warming up the system: higher predator feeding rates but lower energetic efficiencies , 2011 .

[7]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Julie A. Jedlicka,et al.  Effects of Natural Enemy Biodiversity on the Suppression of Arthropod Herbivores in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2009 .

[9]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Phylogenetic grouping, curvature and metabolic scaling in terrestrial invertebrates. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[10]  A. Macfadyen.  Improved Funnel-Type Extractors for Soil Arthropods , 1961 .

[11]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis in R Using Package FME , 2010 .

[12]  Jarrett E Byrnes,et al.  The consequences of consumer diversity loss: different answers from different experimental designs. , 2009, Ecology.

[13]  Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al.  Simulated predator extinctions: predator identity affects survival and recruitment of oysters. , 2008, Ecology.

[14]  Nicolas Loeuille,et al.  The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[15]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Physiological Ecology of Vertebrates: A View from Energetics , 2002 .

[16]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[17]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[18]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species , 2005, Science.

[19]  Sonia Kéfi,et al.  More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[20]  S. Scheu,et al.  Utilization of prey from the decomposer system by generalist predators of grassland , 2008, Oecologia.

[21]  Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al.  PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .

[22]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[23]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Body‐mass constraints on foraging behaviour determine population and food‐web dynamics , 2010 .

[24]  John H. Lawton,et al.  What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[25]  R. Denno,et al.  Stoichiometry of actual vs. potential predator–prey interactions: insights into nitrogen limitation for arthropod predators , 2004 .

[26]  U. Brose,et al.  Warming effects on consumption and intraspecific interference competition depend on predator metabolism. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[27]  C. S. Holling.  Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[28]  M. Crawley,et al.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF PREDATOR SPECIES-RICHNESS IN DIVERSITY-FUNCTION STUDIES. , 2008, Ecology.

[29]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Food webs: ordering species according to body size yields high degree of intervality. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Owen L Petchey,et al.  Size, foraging, and food web structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  E. Berlow,et al.  Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[32]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[33]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[34]  M. Schaefer.  The soil fauna of a beech forest on limestone: trophic structure and energy budget , 2004, Oecologia.

[35]  O. Petchey,et al.  Context-dependent effects of predator removal from experimental microcosm communities , 2009 .

[36]  M Gyllenberg,et al.  Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  A. Ives,et al.  A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning , 2004 .

[38]  E. Berlow,et al.  Predator diversity and identity drive interaction strength and trophic cascades in a food web. , 2008, Ecology.

[39]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Solving Differential Equations in R: Package deSolve , 2010 .

[40]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system , 2003, Nature.

[41]  Deborah P. Waldrop,et al.  More than a Meal , 2001 .

[42]  A Sih,et al.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  U. Brose,et al.  The Allometry of Prey Preferences , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability , 2007, Nature.

[45]  L. Amaral,et al.  The role of body mass in diet contiguity and food-web structure. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[46]  D. Heg,et al.  Niche differentiation depends on body size in a cichlid fish: a model system of a community structured according to size regularities. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[47]  R. Denno,et al.  Predator diversity and the functioning of ecosystems: the role of intraguild predation in dampening trophic cascades , 2005 .

[48]  Erick Greene,et al.  Allometry of behavior. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  Jens O. Riede,et al.  Stepping in Elton's footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[50]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES WITH PREDATOR INTERFERENCE: VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE HOLLING TYPE II MODEL , 2001 .