Body mass constraints on feeding rates determine the consequences of predator loss.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jens O. Riede,et al. Body sizes, cumulative and allometric degree distributions across natural food webs , 2011 .
[2] Björn C. Rall,et al. Taxonomic versus allometric constraints on non‐linear interaction strengths , 2011 .
[3] S. Ernest,et al. Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[4] U. Brose,et al. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.
[5] D. Wise,et al. Terrestrial Trophic Cascades: How Much Do They Trickle? , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[6] Björn C. Rall,et al. Warming up the system: higher predator feeding rates but lower energetic efficiencies , 2011 .
[7] Neo D. Martinez,et al. Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[8] Julie A. Jedlicka,et al. Effects of Natural Enemy Biodiversity on the Suppression of Arthropod Herbivores in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2009 .
[9] Björn C. Rall,et al. Phylogenetic grouping, curvature and metabolic scaling in terrestrial invertebrates. , 2011, Ecology letters.
[10] A. Macfadyen. Improved Funnel-Type Extractors for Soil Arthropods , 1961 .
[11] Karline Soetaert,et al. Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis in R Using Package FME , 2010 .
[12] Jarrett E Byrnes,et al. The consequences of consumer diversity loss: different answers from different experimental designs. , 2009, Ecology.
[13] Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al. Simulated predator extinctions: predator identity affects survival and recruitment of oysters. , 2008, Ecology.
[14] Nicolas Loeuille,et al. The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. , 2011, Ecology letters.
[15] James H. Brown,et al. The Physiological Ecology of Vertebrates: A View from Energetics , 2002 .
[16] R. Peters. The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .
[17] James H. Brown,et al. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .
[18] Kate E. Jones,et al. Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species , 2005, Science.
[19] Sonia Kéfi,et al. More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. , 2012, Ecology letters.
[20] S. Scheu,et al. Utilization of prey from the decomposer system by generalist predators of grassland , 2008, Oecologia.
[21] Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al. PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .
[22] O. Schmitz,et al. Predator diversity and trophic interactions. , 2007, Ecology.
[23] Ulrich Brose,et al. Body‐mass constraints on foraging behaviour determine population and food‐web dynamics , 2010 .
[24] John H. Lawton,et al. What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .
[25] R. Denno,et al. Stoichiometry of actual vs. potential predator–prey interactions: insights into nitrogen limitation for arthropod predators , 2004 .
[26] U. Brose,et al. Warming effects on consumption and intraspecific interference competition depend on predator metabolism. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.
[27] C. S. Holling. Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.
[28] M. Crawley,et al. DENSITY-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF PREDATOR SPECIES-RICHNESS IN DIVERSITY-FUNCTION STUDIES. , 2008, Ecology.
[29] Stefano Allesina,et al. Food webs: ordering species according to body size yields high degree of intervality. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.
[30] Owen L Petchey,et al. Size, foraging, and food web structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[31] E. Berlow,et al. Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.
[32] P. Balvanera,et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.
[33] P. Yodzis,et al. Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[34] M. Schaefer. The soil fauna of a beech forest on limestone: trophic structure and energy budget , 2004, Oecologia.
[35] O. Petchey,et al. Context-dependent effects of predator removal from experimental microcosm communities , 2009 .
[36] M Gyllenberg,et al. Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.
[37] A. Ives,et al. A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning , 2004 .
[38] E. Berlow,et al. Predator diversity and identity drive interaction strength and trophic cascades in a food web. , 2008, Ecology.
[39] Karline Soetaert,et al. Solving Differential Equations in R: Package deSolve , 2010 .
[40] Justin S. Brashares,et al. Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system , 2003, Nature.
[41] Deborah P. Waldrop,et al. More than a Meal , 2001 .
[42] A Sih,et al. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[43] U. Brose,et al. The Allometry of Prey Preferences , 2011, PloS one.
[44] Ulrich Brose,et al. Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability , 2007, Nature.
[45] L. Amaral,et al. The role of body mass in diet contiguity and food-web structure. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.
[46] D. Heg,et al. Niche differentiation depends on body size in a cichlid fish: a model system of a community structured according to size regularities. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.
[47] R. Denno,et al. Predator diversity and the functioning of ecosystems: the role of intraguild predation in dampening trophic cascades , 2005 .
[48] Erick Greene,et al. Allometry of behavior. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[49] Jens O. Riede,et al. Stepping in Elton's footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems. , 2011, Ecology letters.
[50] J. F. Gilliam,et al. FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES WITH PREDATOR INTERFERENCE: VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE HOLLING TYPE II MODEL , 2001 .