Comparison of catheterization and Doppler-derived pressure gradients in a canine model of subaortic stenosis.

The relationship between Doppler-estimated and catheterization-measured pressure gradients was examined by repeated-measures linear regression analysis and difference plots in 15 dogs with naturally occurring subvalvular aortic stenosis. Thirty left ventricular outflow tract gradients were compared during sinus rhythm and 142 gradients during premature or postextrasystolic beats for the following pairs of data: (1) mean catheterization gradient versus mean Doppler gradient, (2) maximal instantaneous catheterization gradient versus maximal Doppler gradient, and (3) peak-to-peak catheterization gradient versus maximal Doppler gradient. The correlation between Doppler-derived and catheterization-derived pressure gradients was excellent (r = 0.99; p < 0.001) for the maximal instantaneous (sinus rhythm: standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 5.7 mm Hg; premature and postextrasystolic beats: SEE = 6.7 mm Hg) and mean gradients (sinus rhythm: SEE = 3.6 mm Hg; premature and postextrasystolic beats: SEE = 4.5 mm Hg). There was also a strong correlation between the peak-to-peak catheterization gradient and the maximal Doppler gradient (sinus rhythm: r = 0.99, p < 0.001, SEE = 5.3 mm Hg; premature and postextrasystolic beats: r = 0.97, p < 0.001, SEE = 7.2 mm Hg). Agreement between the two techniques was best for mean gradients and most disparate for the comparisons of maximal Doppler gradients and peak-to-peak catheterization gradients.

[1]  William Grossman,et al.  Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention , 1990 .

[2]  H. Neufeld,et al.  Subaortic stenosis (discrete form). Classification and angiocardiographic features. , 1971, Radiology.

[3]  L. Hatle,et al.  Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. , 1985, British heart journal.

[4]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Value of multiple echocardiographic views in the evaluation of aortic stenosis in adults by continuous-wave Doppler. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  D. Patterson,et al.  Selective Angiography and Angiocardiography in Dogs with Congenital Cardiovascular Disease1 , 1965 .

[6]  J. Edwards,et al.  Pathology of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction , 1965, Circulation.

[7]  M R O'grady,et al.  Canine congenital aortic stenosis: A review of the literature and commentary. , 1989, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[8]  M. Harrison,et al.  A practical application of Doppler echocardiography for the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. , 1988, American heart journal.

[9]  A. Benchimol,et al.  Doppler ultrasound in cardiology: Physical principles and clinical applications , 1982 .

[10]  C. Otto,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of aortic stenosis. , 1990, Cardiology clinics.

[11]  L. Stangeland,et al.  Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients. , 1988, British heart journal.

[12]  E. Braunwald Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  A. R. Snider,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of subvalvular aortic stenosis before and after operation. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  S. Ettinger Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine , 1989 .

[15]  S. Glantz,et al.  Primer of Applied Regression & Analysis of Variance , 1990 .

[16]  A. Weyman,et al.  Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient "overestimation" by Doppler echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  A. Rosenthal,et al.  Usefulness of the Doppler mean gradient in evaluation of children with aortic valve stenosis and comparison to gradient at catheterization. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  J. Seward,et al.  Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  D. J. Fowler,et al.  Aortic stenosis in the dog: a review of 12 cases , 1989 .

[20]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Continuous-Wave Doppler Velocities and Gradients Across Fixed Tunnel Obstructions: Studies In Vitro and In Vivo , 1987, Circulation.

[21]  D J Sahn,et al.  Prediction of the severity of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction by quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic Doppler studies. , 1983, Circulation.

[22]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[23]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  D. Patterson,et al.  The genetics and pathology of discrete subaortic stenosis in the Newfoundland dog. , 1976, American heart journal.

[25]  L Hatle,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1980, British heart journal.

[26]  J. Seward,et al.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. , 1985, Circulation.

[27]  W. Roberts,et al.  Discrete subaortic stenosis in Newfoundland dogs: association of infective endocarditis. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  J L Elion,et al.  Systematic correlation of continuous-wave Doppler and hemodynamic measurements in patients with aortic stenosis. , 1986, American heart journal.

[29]  H. Stolberg,et al.  Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography and Intervention. 4th ed , 1991 .

[30]  J. Seward,et al.  CASES FROM THE MAYO CLINIC: Diagnosis and Quantitation of the Severity of Discrete Subaortic Stenosis By Echocardiography and Continuous‐Wave Doppler Ultrasound , 1984 .

[31]  Randolph P. Martin,et al.  Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  L. Hatle Noninvasive Assessment and Differentiatioih of Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction with Doppler Ultrasound , 1981, Circulation.

[33]  M H Paul,et al.  Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis in childhood. Study of 51 patients. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  J. Kisslo,et al.  A reconsideration of Doppler assessed gradients in suspected aortic stenosis. , 1985, American heart journal.

[35]  D. Sahn,et al.  Prediction of gradients in fibrous subaortic stenosis by continuous wave two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography: animal studies. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Discrete Subaortic Stenosis Complicated by Aortic Valvular Regurgitation: Clinical, Hemodynamic, and Pathologic Studies and the Results of Operative Treatment , 1965, Circulation.

[37]  L L Huntsman,et al.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  J. Holen,et al.  Doppler ultrasound in aortic stenosis: in vitro studies of pressure gradient determination. , 1987, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  J. Bonagura,et al.  Comparison of transducer placement sites for Doppler echocardiography in dogs with subaortic stenosis. , 1994, American Journal of Veterinary Research.

[40]  B. Wranne,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  J. Ross,et al.  Value and limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of aortic stenosis: a statistical analysis of 70 consecutive patients. , 1986, American heart journal.

[42]  P. Yock,et al.  Comparison of Doppler-derived pressure gradient to that determined at cardiac catheterization in adults with aortic valve stenosis: implications for management. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[43]  A. Weyman Principles and Practice of Echocardiography , 1994 .

[44]  P. Teirstein,et al.  The accuracy of Doppler ultrasound measurement of pressure gradients across irregular, dual, and tunnellike obstructions to blood flow. , 1985, Circulation.

[45]  M Berger,et al.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  M. Harrison,et al.  Pivotal role of aortic valve area calculation by the continuity equation for Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis in patients with combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.