Topics of interest in IS: evolution of themes and differences between research and practice

The information systems discipline has been criticized in the past for lack of secure foundations, frequent shifts in focus and lack of impact on practice. The study deals with two main issues—evolution of themes in IS research and practice over time and differences between research and practice in the IS area as evidenced by the publication process. More than 3000 articles published across five years in four IS journals and five magazines were examined and categorized by thematic areas. We find journals and magazines focusing on different themes with the former focusing on conceptual and abstract models while the latter devote attention to specific applications. Significantly, academic themes show more variance over time. Apparently, there is no significant increase in the richness of themes being addressed over time but there is evidence of conflicting contemporaneous trends in research and practice. # 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[2]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[3]  J CulnanMary,et al.  Research in management information systems, 1980-1984: Points of work and reference , 1986 .

[4]  Mark A. Chesler,et al.  Resistance to Research and Research Utilization: The Death and Life of a Feedback Attempt , 1967 .

[5]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems, 1980-1984: Points of Work and Reference , 1986, MIS Q..

[6]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A Co-Citation Analysis , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  L ChervanyNorman,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems , 1977 .

[10]  E. Lawler,et al.  Quality circles after the fad. , 1985, Harvard business review.

[11]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[12]  Shouhong Wang,et al.  The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Varun Grover,et al.  The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[14]  R. L. Price.  A Customer's View of Organizational Literature , 1995 .

[15]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  Information management , 1996 .

[16]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[17]  J. Laurenson.  Leadership in administration. , 1965, The New Zealand nursing journal. Kai tiaki.

[18]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key issues in information systems management , 1987 .

[19]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  G. Huber.  Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .

[21]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[22]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The IS Expectation Gap: Industry Expectations Versus Academic Preparation , 1993, MIS Q..

[23]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992 , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  W. Jack Duncan,et al.  Transferring Management Theory to Practice , 1974 .