A Fitting Report Position Scheme for the Gated IPACT Dynamic Bandwidth Algorithm in EPONs

In EPONs using the gated Interleaved Polling with Adaptive Cycle Time (IPACT) scheme, the position of the report message within the granted transmission window has a direct effect on the average packet delay within the network. In this paper, this delay is minimized by using a fitting report position (FRP) scheme to adaptively adjust the position of the report message within the transmission window in accordance with the current network load. In the proposed approach, the optimal position of the report message is determined analytically for various system loads. The optical line terminal (OLT) then uses a heuristic algorithm to estimate the load of the optical network units (ONUs) in accordance with their report messages and determines the report message position that minimizes the average packet delay within the network. Finally, the OLT informs the ONUs of the optimal report position through an optional field in the gate message. The performance of the proposed FRP scheme is evaluated for three different network models, namely Poisson traffic with a uniform ONU load, Poisson traffic with a nonuniform ONU load, and self-similar traffic, respectively. The simulation results show that the FRP scheme achieves a lower average packet delay than fixed-report-position schemes such as fixed-report-front (FRF) or fixed-report-end (FRE) for both Poisson and self-similar traffic. The performance improvement is particularly apparent in networks with a nonuniform ONU load distribution.

[1]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Ethernet PONs: a survey of dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) algorithms , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  A. Shami,et al.  Quality of service in Ethernet passive optical networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE/Sarnoff Symposium on Advances in Wired and Wireless Communications.

[3]  Nasir Ghani,et al.  A hybrid granting algorithm for QoS support in Ethernet passive optical networks , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[4]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Fair queueing with service envelopes (FQSE): a cousin-fair hierarchical scheduler for subscriber access networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Jong-Tae Lim,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm in Ethernet passive optical networks , 2003 .

[6]  C.M. Assi,et al.  Jitter performance in ethernet passive optical networks , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  Dong Han,et al.  Packet Delay Analysis of Symmetric Gated Polling System for DBA Scheme in an EPON , 2005, Telecommun. Syst..

[8]  Sudhir S. Dixit,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation for quality-of-service over Ethernet PONs , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  Seog-Gyu Kim,et al.  High Utilization and Hybrid Granting algorithm for EPON , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[10]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Interleaved Polling with Adaptive Cycle Time (IPACT): A Dynamic Bandwidth Distribution Scheme in an Optical Access Network , 2004, Photonic Network Communications.

[11]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Self-similarity through high-variability: statistical analysis of Ethernet LAN traffic at the source level , 1997, TNET.

[12]  Didier Colle,et al.  Analytical model for the IPACT dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm for EPONs , 2007 .

[13]  Radim Bartos,et al.  Analysis of the Gated IPACT Scheme for EPONs , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[14]  T. Holmberg Analysis of EPONs under the static priority scheduling scheme with fixed transmission times , 2006, 2006 2nd Conference on Next Generation Internet Design and Engineering, 2006. NGI '06..

[15]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Ethernet PON (ePON): Design and Analysis of an Optical Access Network , 2001, Photonic Network Communications.

[16]  Michael Scheutzow,et al.  Delay analysis of Ethernet passive optical networks with gated service , 2008 .