Commercialisation of academic research in higher education institutions of Pakistan

Universities are complex and diversified institutions. Besides education and research, universities have now been assigned a new role of academic research commercialisation. Universities are pressurised to act as a bridge for transferring of knowledge to industries and generate resources. Commercialisation of academic research is still a new phenomenon for universities in Pakistan. Universities are facing challenges and difficulties in managing commercialisation activities along with teaching and research. In order to overcome these challenges, some support structures have been introduced in the form of Office of Research, Innovation and Commercialisation (ORIC). The core rationale of this study is to explore the commercialisation activities in universities of Pakistan. Pakistani universities have support structures in the form of ORIC but still lacking behind in commercialisation activities. Qualitative research strategy and semi-structured interviews technique have been adopted. In this study two vice chancellors, higher education commission director, fifteen academic researchers and five ORIC managers were interviewed in five leading universities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Content analysis has been used to analyse the data. The results shows that major obstacles in academic research commercialisation in Pakistan are applied and basic research culture, research budgetary constraints, immature industry, unstable political condition of the country and lack of qualified staff in ORIC. Based on the finding of the research, some recommendations have been proposed for successful commercialisation. A best practice model has been proposed for ORIC, Pakistan to follow.

[1]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[2]  M. Gurdon,et al.  Emerging Issues in Economic Development Policy and Technology Incubators: The Vermont Center for Emerging Technologies Experience , 2006 .

[3]  Jason Owen,et al.  To Patent or Not : Faculty Decisions and 1 , 2000 .

[4]  M. Feldman,et al.  Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development , 2006 .

[5]  Michael D. Reilly,et al.  Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions , 2000 .

[6]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[7]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of firmspecific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry , 1997 .

[8]  J. A. Perry,et al.  Challenges to using neem (Azadirachta indica var. sianensis Valenton) in Thailand , 2008, Economic Botany.

[9]  M. Wright,et al.  30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[10]  A. Hillman,et al.  Resource Dependence Theory: A Review , 2009 .

[11]  Goldie Blumenstyk.  Universities Report More Licensing Income but Fewer Start-Ups in 2005. , 2007 .

[12]  Alan Hughes,et al.  University-Industry Links and U.K. Science and Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[13]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[14]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View , 2005 .

[15]  Jeremiah P. Ostriker,et al.  A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States , 2011 .

[16]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence , 2005 .

[17]  Gary Gereffi,et al.  Global Production Systems and Third World Development. , 1995 .

[18]  Francis A. Menezes,et al.  Power in organisations , 1979 .

[19]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo , 2008 .

[20]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[21]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[22]  Jessaca K. Spybrook.  Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice , 2008 .

[23]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[24]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[25]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation , 1996 .

[26]  Randall W. Eberts,et al.  Universities and the Startup of New Companies: Can We Generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? , 1993 .

[27]  R. Pollnac,et al.  Drinking Patterns and Acculturation in Rural Buganda , 1969 .

[28]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Formation of High-Tech University Spinouts: The Role of Joint Ventures and Venture Capital Investors , 2004 .

[29]  D. B. Bromley,et al.  Academic contributions to psychological counselling. 1. A philosophy of science for the study of individual cases , 1990 .

[30]  Roger R. Stough,et al.  Bridging knowledge to commercialization: the good, the bad, and the challenging , 2013 .

[31]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe – The Case of Sweden and Ireland , 2000 .

[32]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[33]  Richard James,et al.  Quality and Power in Higher Education , 2006 .

[34]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education , 2005 .

[35]  R. Voola,et al.  The Effects of Market Orientation, Technological Opportunism, and E-Business Adoption on Performance: A Moderated Mediation Analysis , 2012 .

[36]  Shahid Yusuf,et al.  Opening the Ivory Tower to Business: University–Industry Linkages and the Development of Knowledge-Intensive Clusters in Asian Cities , 2007 .

[37]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[38]  Stanislav Zaichenko,et al.  Towards a new role of universities in Russia: prospects and limitations , 2009 .

[39]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[40]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[41]  Kamariah Ismail,et al.  The commercialisation process of patents by universities , 2011 .

[42]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge?: Global trends in the output of corporate research articles , 2004 .

[43]  Abdel Kader Djeflat.  The management of technology transfer: Views and experiences of developing countries , 2014 .

[44]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[45]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model , 2009 .

[46]  J. Peltier,et al.  Interactive strategy formation: Organizational and entrepreneurial factors related to effective customer information systems practices in B2B firms , 2008 .

[47]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Does Inventor Ownership Encourage University Research-Derived Entrepreneurship? A Six University Comparison , 2011 .

[48]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[49]  Y. Li,et al.  Linking management control system with product development and process decisions to cope with environment complexity , 2005 .

[50]  Thitima Puttitanun,et al.  Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries , 2005 .

[51]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  The Changing Social Contract for Science and the Evolution of the University , 2003 .

[52]  Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand,et al.  Technology-based SMEs in the Go ¨teborg Region: Their Origin and Interaction with Universities and Large Firms , 1999 .

[53]  S. Mann.  Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach , 2013 .

[54]  F. Berkes,et al.  Indigenous Knowledge of Ecological Variability and Commons Management: A Case Study on Berry Harvesting from Northern Canada , 2006 .

[55]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry , 2010 .

[56]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium , 2003, Scientometrics.

[57]  A. Inzelt,et al.  The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition , 2004 .

[58]  Keiko Yokoyama,et al.  Entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK Universities: Governance, Management, Leadership, and Funding , 2006 .

[59]  T. Daim,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer , 2007 .

[60]  Raymond W. Smilor,et al.  The Research University and the Development of High-Technology Centers in the United States , 2007 .

[61]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market , 2005 .

[62]  Thomas Baaken,et al.  Marketing orientation in university-industry linkages , 2004 .

[63]  D. Kuratko.  Entrepreneurial Leadership in the 21st Century , 2007 .

[64]  Ah-Lian Kor,et al.  Technology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions , 2013 .

[65]  Christopher S. Hayter.  Harnessing University Entrepreneurship for Economic Growth , 2013 .

[66]  Marco Sabbadin.  Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .

[67]  Reza Bandarian.  From Idea to Market in RIPI: An Agile Frame for NTD Process , 2007 .

[68]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting , 2007, Scientometrics.

[69]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university–industry technology transfer , 2005 .

[70]  J. Ulhøi,et al.  The Networked Business Incubator: Leveraging Entrepreneurial Agency , 2005 .

[71]  Yuan-Chieh Chang,et al.  The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective , 2009 .

[72]  Christine Tamásy,et al.  Rethinking Technology-Oriented Business Incubators: Developing a Robust Policy Instrument for Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Regional Development? , 2007 .

[73]  Grant Harman.  Political Instruments Employed by Governments to Enhance University Research and Knowledge Transfer Capacity , 2009 .

[74]  Robert E. Litan,et al.  Commercializing University Innovations: A Better Way , 2007 .

[75]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[76]  J. Berman,et al.  Connecting with industry: bridging the divide , 2008 .

[77]  Fred C. Lunenburg,et al.  The decision-making process. , 1987, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[78]  Sarfraz A. Mian,et al.  Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: An integrative framework , 1997 .

[79]  Alice Lam,et al.  What Motivates Academic Scientists to Engage in Research Commercialisation: 'Gold,' 'Ribbon' or 'Puzzle'? , 2010 .

[80]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[81]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Does the Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship hold for regions , 2005 .

[82]  David A. Kirby,et al.  Creating Entrepreneurial Universities in the UK: Applying Entrepreneurship Theory to Practice , 2006 .

[83]  J. Barney,et al.  The Future of Resource-Based Theory , 2011 .

[84]  Claes Brundenius,et al.  Vitalizing the Swedish university system: implementation of the ‘third mission’ , 2009 .

[85]  Malcolm Tight,et al.  National innovation and the academic research enterprise: public policy in global perspective , 2011 .

[86]  Ann E Mills,et al.  Changing patent strategies: what will they mean for the industry? , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[87]  Stefano Trento,et al.  INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH , 2007 .

[88]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[89]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[90]  Albert E. Muir.  The Technology Transfer System: Inventions - Marketing - Licensing - Patenting - Setting - Practice - Management - Policy , 1997 .

[91]  Edward P. St. John,et al.  Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education , 2005 .

[92]  Ernesto Tavoletti,et al.  Higher Education Excellence and Local Economic Development: The Case of the Entrepreneurial University of Twente , 2005 .

[93]  D. Campbell.  The Informant in Quantitative Research , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[94]  Manuel Sánchez-Pérez,et al.  Exploitation- and exploration-based innovations: The role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors , 2011 .

[95]  Martin Meyer.  Independent Inventors and Public Support Measures: Insights from 33 Case Studies in Finland , 2005 .

[96]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[97]  Fumio Komoda.  JAPANESE STUDIES ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A SURVEY , 1986 .

[98]  Grant Harman,et al.  Australian university research commercialisation: perceptions of technology transfer specialists and science and technology academics , 2010 .

[99]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[100]  Paul Stephen Benneworth,et al.  Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation , 2010 .

[101]  L. Glenna,et al.  Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism , 2008 .

[102]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[103]  Chris Styles.  Export Performance Measures in Australia and the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[104]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities , 2006 .

[105]  W. Omar,et al.  THE ROLE OF TTO'S ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE IN COMMERCIALISING , 2012 .

[106]  A. Sánchez,et al.  The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking , 2003 .

[107]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Chief Executive Officers, Top Management Teams, and Boards of Directors: Congruent or Countervailing Forces? , 1996 .

[108]  Donald G. Richards,et al.  Trade-related intellectual property rights , 2005 .

[109]  C. Moustakas.  Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[110]  Jerry Patchell,et al.  Governance for University-Industry Collaboration in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[111]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[112]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[113]  Henry. Wasser,et al.  Creating Entrepreneurial Universities , 2001 .

[114]  Irwin Feller,et al.  Social Contracts and the Impact of Matching Fund Requirements on American Research Universities , 2000 .

[115]  Georg Krücken,et al.  Linkages to the civil society as ‘leisure time activities’? Experiences at a German university , 2009 .

[116]  Theresa S. Cho,et al.  ISOMORPHISM IN REVERSE: INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AS AN EXPLANATION FOR RECENT INCREASES IN INTRAINDUSTRY HETEROGENEITY AND MANAGERIAL DISCRETION , 2004 .

[117]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[118]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies , 2001 .

[119]  Jerry Patchell,et al.  Creating University-Industry Collaboration in Hong Kong , 2019, Promoting Local Growth.

[120]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[121]  K. Brown,et al.  Reconciling moral and legal collective entitlement: Implications for community-based land reform , 2007 .

[122]  John Browne,et al.  Securing a sustainable future for higher education : an independent review of higher education funding and student finance , 2010 .

[123]  Michael Mintrom,et al.  Managing the research function of the university: pressures and dilemmas , 2008 .

[124]  Joanna Poyago-Theotoky,et al.  Universities and Fundamental Research: Reflections on the Growth of University–Industry Partnerships , 2002 .

[125]  Marilyn Lichtman,et al.  Qualitative Research in Education: A User's Guide , 2006 .

[126]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[127]  Eric Abdullateef.  Developing Knowledge and Creativity: Asset Tracking as a Strategy Centerpiece , 2000 .

[128]  Nagesh Kumar,et al.  Commission on Intellectual Property Rights Study Paper 1 b Intellectual Property Rights , Technology and Economic Development : Experiences of Asian Countries , 2002 .

[129]  G. George,et al.  Entry into Insular Domains: A Longitudinal Study of Knowledge Structuration and Innovation in Biotechnology Firms , 2008 .

[130]  Arabella Bhutto,et al.  Indicators for science and technology policy in Pakistan: Entering the science, technology and innovation paradigm , 2012 .

[131]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2000 .

[132]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  “But Peter’s in it for the money” – the liminality of entrepreneurial scientists , 2012 .

[133]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[134]  N. America.  The Global Competitiveness Index 2013 – 2014 : Country Profile Highlights , 2012 .

[135]  Heike Mayer.  A Clarification of the Role of the University in Economic Development: Oregon's Network Approach to Foster Nanotechnology Research and Development , 2003 .

[136]  Joshua B. Powers,et al.  University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[137]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Technology Transfer and the End of the Bayh-Dole Effect: Patents as an Analytical Lens on University-Industry-Government Relations , 2013, ArXiv.

[138]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (5th edn) , 2007 .

[139]  Nola Hewitt-Dundas,et al.  Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities , 2012 .

[140]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[141]  Richard Malinski,et al.  The Research Student's Guide to Success , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[142]  Todd A. Finkle,et al.  The Relationship between Boards of Directors and Initial Public Offerings in the Biotechnology Industry , 1998 .

[143]  Martin Hummel,et al.  University Patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What Role Did the Professors' Privilege Play? , 2009 .

[144]  S. Zahra,et al.  Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization , 2002 .

[145]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Spin-offs from research centers at a research university☆ , 2000 .

[146]  Carlos A. Primo Fink Carsten Sepulveda Braga,et al.  Intellectual property rights and economic development , 2000 .

[147]  Shōji ITō.  MODIFYING IMPORTED TECHNOLOGY BY LOCAL ENGINEERS: HYPOTHESES AND CASE STUDY OF INDIA , 1986 .

[148]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems, Research Policy (forthcoming) , 2006, 0911.3407.

[149]  John Seidler,et al.  On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis , 1974 .

[150]  David A. Keast,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Universities: Definitions, Practices, and Implications , 1995 .

[151]  Brent Goldfarb,et al.  The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output , 2008 .

[152]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[153]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  Technology transfer in United States universities , 2002 .

[154]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Resource–performance relationships in industrial export ventures: The role of resource inimitability and substitutability , 2006 .

[155]  A. Grandi,et al.  Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas , 2005 .

[156]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[157]  A. O'Cass,et al.  Implementing competitive strategies: the role of responsive and proactive market orientations , 2010 .

[158]  Alan V. Deardorff.  Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection , 1992 .

[159]  John Pratt,et al.  The UK Technology Transfer System: Calls for Stronger Links Between Higher Education and Industry , 2000 .

[160]  M. Weber.  Methodology of Social Sciences , 1949 .

[161]  A. Link,et al.  Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , 2003 .

[162]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  University Commercialization Strategies in the Development of Regional Bioclusters , 2008 .

[163]  V. P. Godambe.  Estimation in Survey Sampling: Robustness and Optimality , 1982 .

[164]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[165]  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council A renewed partnership with the countries of Africa , the Caribbean and the Pacific , 2016 .

[166]  D. Urbano,et al.  The development of an entrepreneurial university , 2012 .

[167]  M. Crotty.  The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[168]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[169]  A. Mazza,et al.  Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest. , 2011 .

[170]  Christopher Newfield.  Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act (review) , 2005 .

[171]  Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko,et al.  Entrepreneurship, professionalism, leadership : a framework and measure for understanding boundaryless careers , 2012 .

[172]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  Transferring technology to developing countries—Critical factors for success , 1989 .

[173]  Mohammad Reza Daraei,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for an Entrepreneurial University: A Study in Iranian Context with an IPOO Model , 2011 .

[174]  Lori Pressman,et al.  Pre-Production Investment and Jobs Induced by MIT Exclusive Patent Licenses: A Preliminary Model to Measure the Economic Impact of University Licensing , 2005 .

[175]  D. Felsenstein.  University-related science parks - 'seedbeds' or 'enclaves' of innovation? , 1994 .

[176]  Philippe Mustar,et al.  How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure , 1997 .

[177]  Keun Lee,et al.  Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China☆ , 2006 .

[178]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[179]  Henry S. Rowen,et al.  The Silicon Valley Edge: A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 2000 .

[180]  N. Baldini,et al.  University Patenting and Licensing Activity: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[181]  Jørgen Gulddahl Rasmussen,et al.  Linking between Danish universities and society , 2009 .

[182]  Jung Cheol Shin,et al.  Knowledge-based innovation and collaboration: a triple-helix approach in Saudi Arabia , 2011, Scientometrics.

[183]  Roger L. Geiger,et al.  Beyond Technology Transfer: US State Policies to Harness University Research for Economic Development , 2005 .

[184]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[185]  S. Banack,et al.  Ethnobotanical investigation of the acjachemen clapperstick from blue elderberry,Sambucus mexicana (Caprifoliaceae) , 2008, Economic Botany.

[186]  Scott L. Newbert.  Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research , 2007 .

[187]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[188]  Uma Kumar,et al.  State sponsored large scale technology transfer projects in a developing country context , 2007 .

[189]  Richard C. Dorf,et al.  Technology transfer from universities and research laboratories , 1990 .

[190]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  Not invented here: technology licensing, knowledge transfer and innovation based on public research , 2009 .

[191]  J. Barney.  Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[192]  R. L. Jensen,et al.  Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights , 2007 .

[193]  Pontus Braunerhjelm,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship. Social Norms, University Culture and Policies , 2007 .

[194]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[195]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions , 2008 .

[196]  Morris Crawford.  Technology transfer and the computerization of South Korea and Taiwan Part I: Developments in the private sector , 1986 .

[197]  Nils Stieglitz,et al.  Innovations and the Role of Complementarities in a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[198]  A. Link,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices : An Exploratory Study # , 1999 .

[199]  Burton L. M. Mwamila,et al.  Universities and socio-economic development in Tanzania: public perceptions and realities on the ground , 2009 .

[200]  Stephen R.J. Sheppard,et al.  Culture and communication: Can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? , 2006 .

[201]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[202]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology , 1998 .

[203]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations , 1998 .

[204]  H. Bernard.  Research methods in anthropology : qualitative and quantitative methods , 2002 .

[205]  COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS , 2008 .

[206]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science , 2002 .

[207]  Matthew S. Wood.  Does One Size Fit All? The Multiple Organizational Forms Leading to Successful Academic Entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[208]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research , 2005 .

[209]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[210]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[211]  R. Baron,et al.  Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums , 2007 .

[212]  Inga Ulnicane-Ozolina,et al.  Moving beyond teaching and research: economic and social tasks of universities in Latvia , 2009 .

[213]  Donald Kennedy,et al.  Another Century's End, Another Revolution for Higher Education , 1995 .

[214]  Ngoc Ca Tran.  Reaching out to society: Vietnamese universities in transition , 2009 .

[215]  Oili-Helena Ylijoki,et al.  Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research , 2003 .

[216]  José L. Encarnação,et al.  Technology transfer systems in the United States and Germany : lessons and perspectives , 1997 .